Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials

Neurophysiologie Clinique

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 53-62

  Rombaux, P ^a   Mouraux, A ^b   Bertrand, B ^c   Guerit, JM ^e   Hummel, T ^d  

^a CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF MONT GODINNE   (Belgium)

^d Smell and Taste Clinic ^*  (Germany)

^e Institut Medical Edith Cavell   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Chemosensory event related potential; Olfaction; Olfactory and trigeminal information; Smell; Stimulator

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AIR; ARTICLE; BREATHING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE; DILUTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; NERVE FUNCTION; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROEPITHELIAL BODY; NEUROLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; NOSE MUCOSA; ODOR; OLFACTOMETRY; OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM; OLFACTORY NERVE; OLFACTORY NERVE DISEASE; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PARAMETER; RECORDING; SENSORY STIMULATION; SMELLING DISORDER; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; THEORY; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; ANIMAL; CHEMORECEPTOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; CHEMORECEPTORS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; OLFACTION DISORDERS; SMELL; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

EID: 33745868345     PISSN: 09877053     EISSN: 17697131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2006.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Allison T., and Goff W.R. Human cerebral evoked responses to odorous stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 23 (1967) 558-560
2. Auffermann H., Gerull G., Mathe F., and Mrowinski D. Olfactory evoked potentials and contingent negative variation simultaneously recorded for diagnosis of smell disorders. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 102 (1993) 6-10
3. Barz S., Hummel T., Pauli E., Majer M., Lang C.J.G., and Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials in response to trigeminal and olfactory stimulation in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Neurology 49 (1997) 1424-1431
4. Becker E., Hummel T., et al. Olfactory event-related potentials in psychosis-prone subjects. Int. J. Psychol. 15 (1993) 51-58
5. Convington J., Geisler M.W., Poloch J., and Murphy C. Normal aging and odour intensity effects on the olfactory event-related potential. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 32 (1999) 205-214
6. Cui L., and Evans W.J. Olfactory event-related potentials to amyl acetate in congenital anosmia. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 102 (1997) 303-306
7. Daniels C., Gottwald B., Pause B.M., Sijka B., Medhorn H.M., and Ferstl R. Olfactory event-related potentials in patients with brain tumours. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 8 (2001) 1523-1530
8. Doerfler H., Hummel T., Klimek L., and Kobal G. Intranasal trigeminal sensitivity in subjects with allergic rhinitis. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. (2005) 23
9. Doty R.L., Shaman P., Kimmelman C.P., and Dann M.S. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test; A rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope 94 (1984) 176-178
10. Evans W.J., Cui L., and Starr A. Olfactory event-related potentials in human subjects; effects of age and gender. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95 (1995) 293-301
11. Evans W.J., Kobal G., Lorig T.S., and Prah J.D. Suggestions for collection and reporting of chemosensory (olfactory) event-related potentials. Chem. Senses 18 (1993) 751-756
12. Finkenzeller P. Gemittelte EEG-Potentiale bei olfactorischer ReizungPotentiale bei olfaktorischer Reizung; gemittelte EEG. Pflügers Arch. Ges. Physiol. 292 (1966) 76-80
13. Frasnelli J., Heilmann S., and Hummel T. Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation. Neurosci. Lett. 362 (2004) 65-69
14. Frasnelli J., and Hummel T. Age-related decline of intranasal trigeminal sensitivity: is it a peripheral event?. Brain Res. 987 2 (2003) 201-206
15. Geisler M., and Murphy C. Event-related brain potentials to attended and ignored olfactory and trigeminal stimulus. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 37 (2000) 309-315
16. Geisler M.W., Schlotfeldt C.R., Middleton C.B., Dulay M.F., and Murphy C. Traumatic brain injury assessed with olfactory event-related brain potentials. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16 1 (1999) 77-86
17. Hansenne M. The p300 cognitive event related potential; theoretical and psychobiologic perspectives. Neurophysiol. Clin. 30 4 (2000) 191-210
18. 2 stimulation of the human nals mucosa. Pain 72 (1997) 145-151
19. Hawkes C.H., and Shepard B.C. Olfactory evoked responses and identification tests in neurological disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 30 (1998) 608-615
20. Hummel T. Assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 36 (2000) 147-155
21. Hummel T., Barz S., Pauli E., and Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 108 (1998) 208-217
22. Hummel T., Damm M., Vent J., Schmidt M., Theissen P., Larsson M., et al. Depth of olfactory sulcus and olfactory function. Brain Res. 975 1-2 (2003) 85-89
23. Hummel T., Futschik T., Frasnelli J., and Hüttenbrink K.B. Effects of olfactory function, age, and gender on trigeminally mediated sensations: a study based on the lateralization of chemosensory stimuli. Toxicol. Lett. 140-141 (2003) 273-280
24. Hummel T., and Kobal G. Olfactory event-related potentials. In: Simon S.A. (Ed). Methods and New Frontiers in Neurosciences (2002), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
25. Hummel T., and Kobal G. Differences in human evoked potentials related to olfactory or trigeminal chemosensory activation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 84 (1992) 84-89
26. Hummel T., and Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials to trigeminal stimuli change in relation to the interval between repetitive stimulation of the nasal mucosa. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 256 (1999) 16-21
27. Hummel T., Livermore A., Hummel C., and Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials in man; relation to olfactory and painful sensations elicited by nicotine. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 84 2 (1992) 192-195
28. Hummel T., Pietsch H., and Kobal G. Kallmann's syndrome and chemosensory evoked potentials. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 248 5 (1991) 311-312
29. Hummel T., Sekinger B., Wolfe S.R., Pauli E., and Kobal G. 'Sniffin' Sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odour identification, odour discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem. Sens. 22 (1997) 39-52
30. Kettenmann B., Hummel T., and Kobal G. Functional imaging of olfactory activation in the human brain. In: Simon S.A., and Nicolelis M.A.L. (Eds). Methods and Frontiers in Chemosensory Research (2001), CRC press Baco raton, Florida, USA 477-506
31. Kobal G. Eletrophysiological Measurement of Olfactory Function in Hanbook of Olfaction and Gustation Second edition (2003), R. Doty, Marcel Dekker ed
32. Kobal G., and Hummel C. Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71 (1988) 241-250
33. Kobal G., and Hummel T. Olfactory and intranasal trigeminal event-related potentials in anosmic patients. Laryngoscope 108 (1998) 1033-1035
34. Kobal G., and Plattig K.H. Metodische anmerkungen zur gewinnung olfaktorisher EEG-antworten des wachen menschen (objective olfaktometrie). Z. EEG-EMG 9 (1978) 135-145
35. Leopold D.A., Hummel T., Schwob J.E., Hong S.C., Knecht M., and Kobal G. Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium. Laryngoscope 110 (2000) 417-421
36. Livermore A., and Hummel T. The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. Chem. Senses 29 (2004) 41-51
37. Lorig T.S. The application of electroencephalographic techniques to the study of human olfaction; a review and tutorial. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 36 2 (2000) 91-104
38. Lorig T.S., Matia D.C., Peszka J.J., and Bryant D.N. The effects of active and passive stimulation on chemosensory event-related potentials. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 23 (1996) 199-205
39. Lundström J.N., Frasnelli J., Larson M., and Hummel T. Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 57 (2005) 181-186
40. Morgan C.D., Covington J.W., Geisler M.W., Polich J., and Murphy C. Olfactory event-related potentials; older males demonstrate the greatest deficits. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 104 (1997) 351-358
41. Morgan C.D., Geisler M.W., Covington J.W., Polich J., and Murphy C. Olfactory P3 in young and older adults. Psychophysiology 36 (1999) 281-287
42. Mueller A., Rodewald A., Reden J., Gerber J., Von Kummer R., and Hummel T. Reduced olfactory bulb volume in post traumatic and post-infectious olfactory dysfunction. Neuroreport 4 16 5 (2005) 475-478
43. Murphy C., Morgan C.D., Geisler M.W., Wetter S., Covington J.W., Madowitz M.D., et al. Olfactory event-related potentials and aging: normative data. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 36 (2000) 133-145
44. Murphy C., Nordin S., De Wijk R., Cain W., and Polich J. Olfactory-evoked potentials; assessment of young and elderly, and comparison to psychophysical threshold. Chem. Senses 19 (1994) 47-56
45. Nordin S., Martinkauppi M., Oloffson J., Hummel T., Millqvist E., and Bende M. Chemosensory perception and event-related potentials in self-reported chemical hypersensitivity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 55 (2005) 243-255
46. Nordin S., Quinonez C., Morgan C.D., Geisler M.W., Polich J., and Murphy C. Olfactory event-related potentials in young and elderly adults; evaluation of tracking task versus eyes open/closed recording. Chem. Senses 24 (1999) 459-464
47. Olofsson J.K., and Nordin S. Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials. Chem. Senses 29 7 (2004) 629-637
48. Olofsson J., Broman D., Wulff M., Martinkauppi M., and Nordin S. Olfactory and chemosomatosensory function in pregnant women assessed with event-related potentials. Psysiol. Behav. 15 86 1-2 (2005) 252-257
49. Pause B., Krauel K., Sojka B., and Ferstl R. Is odour processing related to oral breathing?. Int. J. Psychphysiol. 32 (1999) 251-260
50. Pause B., and Krauel K. Chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP) as a key to the psychology of odours. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 36 (2000) 105-122
51. Pause B.M., Sojka B., Krauel K., Fehn-Wolfsdorf G., and Ferstl R. Olfactory information processing during the course of the menstrual cycle. Biol. Psychol. 27 44 1 (1996) 31-54
52. Pause B.M., Sojka B., Krauel K., and Ferstl R. The nature of the late positive complex within the olfactory event-related potential. Psychophysiology 33 (1996) 168-172
53. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9 4 (1992) 456-479
54. Rombaux P., Collet S., Eloy P., Ledeghen S., and Bertrand B. Smell disorders in ENT clinic. B-ENT 1 suppl (2005) 97-109
55. Royet J.P., and Plailly J. Lateralization of olfactory processes. Chem. Senses 29 (2004) 731-745
56. Sakuma K., Nakashima K., and Takahashi K. Olfactory evoked potentials in Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and anosmic patients. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 50 1 (1996) 35-40
57. Smith D.B., Allison T., et al. Human odorant evoked responses: effects of trigeminal or olfactory deficit. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 30 (1971) 313-317
58. Tateyama T., Hummel T., Roscher S., Post H., and Kobal G. Relation of olfactory event-related potentials to changes in stimulus concentration. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 108 (1998) 449-455
59. Teghtsoonian R., and Teghtsoonian M. Testing a perceptual constancy model for odor strength: the effects of sniff pressure and resistance to sniffing. Perception 13 (1984) 743-752
60. Thesen T., and Murphy C. Age-related changes in olfactory processing detected with olfactory event-related brain potentials using velopharyngeal closure and natural breathing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 40 (2001) 119-127
61. Wang L., Walker V.E., Sardi H., Fraser C., and Jacob T.J.C. The correlation between physiological and psychological responses to odour in human subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 4 (2002) 542-551
62. Welge-Lussen C., Wille K., et al. Test-retest reliability of chemosensory evoked potentials. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 20 (2003) 135-142
63. Wetter S., and Murphy C. A paradigm for measuring the olfactory event-related potential in the clinic. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 49 (2003) 57-65
64. Wetter S., Polich J., and Murphy C. Olfactory, auditory and visual ERPs from single trials: no evidence for habituation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 54 (2004) 263-272
65. Youssem D.M., Geckle R.J., Bilker W.B., and Doty R.L. Olfactory bulb and tract and temporal lobe volumes; normative data across decades. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 855 (1998) 546-555
66. Zatorre R.J. Jones Gotman M., Rouby C. Neural mechanisms involved in odor pleasantness and intensity judgement. Neuroreport 21 11 (2000) 2711-2716