Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 208-217

  Hummel, T ^a   Barz, S ^a   Pauli, E ^a   Kobal, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; Nociception; Olfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000916523     PISSN: 00134694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00074-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ayabe-Kanamura, S., Endo, H., Kobayakawa, T., Takeda, T. and Saito, S. Measurement of olfactory evoked magnetic fields by a 64 channel whole-head SQUID system. Chem. Senses, 1997, 22: 214-215.
2. Barz, S., Hummel, T., Pauli, E., Majer, M., Lang, C.J.G. and Kobal, G. Chemosensory event-related potentials in response to trigeminal and olfactory stimulation in idiopathic Parkinson's Disease. Neurology, 1997, in press.
3. Becker, E., Hummel, T., Fiel, E., Pauli, E., Kobal, G. and Hautzinger, M. Olfactory event-related potentials in psychosis-prone subjects. Int. J. Psychol., 1993, 15: 51-58.
4. Cain, W.S. Testing olfaction in a clinical setting. Ear Nose Throat J., 1989, 68: 321-328.
5. Doty, R.L. and Kobal, G. Current trends in the measurement of olfactory function. In: R.L. Doty (Ed.), Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995, pp. 191-225.
6. Doty, R.L., Brugger, W.P.E., Jurs, P.C., Orndorff, M.A., Snyder, P.J. and Lowry, L.D. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol. Behav., 1978, 20: 175-185.
7. Doty, R.L., Shaman, P., Applebaum, S.L., Giberson, R., Sikorski, L. and Rosenberg, L. Smell identification ability: changes with age. Science, 1984, 226: 1441-1443.
8. Duffy, F.H., McAnulty, G.B. and Albert, M.S. The pattern of age-related differences in electrophysiological activity of healthy males and females. Neurobiol. Aging, 1993, 14: 73-84.
9. Dustman, R.E., Shearer, D.E. and Emmerson, R.Y. EEG and event-related potentials in normal aging. Progr. Neurobiol., 1993, 41: 369-401.
10. Erzigkeit, H., Lehrl, S., Blaha, L. and Heerklotz, B. Messung und Meßver-fahren in der Psychopathologie. Vless Verlag, VaterstettenMünchen, 1979.
11. Evans, W.J., Cui, L. and Starr, A. Olfactory event-related potentials in normal human subjects: effects of age and gender. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 95: 293-301.
12. Harkins, S.W. and Chapman, C.R. Detection and decision factors in pain perception in young and elderly men. Pain, 1976, 2: 253-264.
13. Hummel, T. and Kobal, G. Differences in human evoked potentials related to olfactory or trigeminal chemosensory activation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 84-89.
14. Hummel, T., Livermore, A., Hummel, C. and Kobal, G. Chemosensory event-related potentials: relation to olfactory and painful sensations elicited by nicotine. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 192-195.
15. Huttunen, J., Kobal, G., Kaukoronta, E. and Hari, R. Cortical responses to painful CCVstimuIation of nasal mucosa: a magnetoencephalographic study in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 64: 347-349.
16. Kettenmann, B., Hummel, C., Stefan, H. and Kobal, G. Magnetoencephalographical recordings: separation of cortical responses to different chemical stimulation in man. Funct. Neurosci. (EEG Suppl.), 1996a, 46: 287-290.
17. Kettenmann, B., Jousm :äki, V., Portin, K., Salmelin, R., Kobal, G. and Hari, R. Odorants activate the human superior temporal sulcus. Neurosci. Lett., 1996b, 203: 143-145.
18. Kobal, G. Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation. Pain, 1985, 22: 151-163.
19. Kobal, G. and Hummel, C. Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1988, 71: 241250.
20. Kobal, G. and Hummel, T. Olfactory evoked potentials in humans. In: T.V. Getchell, R.L. Doty, L.M. Bartoshuk and J.B.J. Snow (Eds.), Smell and Taste in Health and Disease. Raven Press, New York, 1991. pp. 255-275.
21. Kobal, G. and Hummel, T. Olfactory (chemosensory) event-related potentials. Tox. Ind. Health, 1994, 10: 587-596.
22. Kobal, G., Hummel, T. and Hoesl, M. Pain-related electrical evoked potentials by chemical stimuli: effects of fentanyl. In: S. Lipton, E. Tunks and M. Zoppi (Eds.), Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Raven Press, New York, 1990, pp. 95-98.
23. Kobal, G., Hummel, T. and Van Toller, S. Differences in chemosensory evoked potentials to olfactory and somatosensory chemical stimuli presented to left and right nostrils. Chem. Senses, 1992, 17: 233-244.
24. Livermore, A., Hummel, T. and Kobal, G. Chemosensory evoked potentials in the investigation of interactions between the olfactory and the somatosensory (trigeminal) systems. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992. 83: 201-210.
25. Lorig, T.S., Matia, D.C., Pezka, JJ. and Bryant, D.N. The effects of active and passive stimulation on chemosensory event-related potentials. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1996, 23: 199-205.
26. Merz, J., Lehrl, S., Galster, J.V. and Erzigkeit, H. MWT-B - ein Intelligenzkurztest. Psychiat. Neural. Med. Psychol., 1975, 27: 423428.
27. Murphy, C. Age-related effects on the threshold, psychophysical function, and pleasantness of menthol. J. Gerontol., 1983, 38: 217-222.
28. Murphy, C., Nordin, S., de Wijk, R.A., Cain, W.S. and Polich, J. Olfactory-evoked potentials: assessment of young and elderly, and comparison to psychophysical threshold. Chem. Senses, 1994, 19: 47-56.
29. Schiffman, S., Moss, J. and Erickson, R.P. Thresholds of food odors in the elderly. Exp. Aging Res., 1976, 2: 389-398.
30. Stevens, J.C. and Cain, W.S. Aging and the perception of nasal irritation. Physiol. Behav., 1986, 37: 323-328.
31. Stevens, J.C. and Cain, W.S. Old-age deficits in the sense of smell as gauged by thresholds, magnitude matching, and odor identification. Psychol. Aging, 1987, 2: 36-42.
32. Stevens, J.C., Platinga, A. and Cain, W.S. Reduction of odor and nasal pungency associated with aging. Neurbbiol. Aging, 1982, 3: 125-132.
33. Stevens, J.C., Cain, W.S. and Schiet, F.T. Olfactory adaptation and recovery in old age. Perception, 1989, 18: 265-276.
34. Vaschide, N. L'état de la sensibilité olfective dans la vieillesse. Bull. Laryngol. Otol. Rhino!., 1904, 7: 323-333.
35. Venstrom, D. and Amoore, J.E. Olfactory threshold in relation to age, sex, or smoking. J. Food Sei., 1968, 33: 264-265.
36. Wechsler, D. A standardized memory scale for clinical use. J. Psychol., 1945, 19: 87-95.
37. Wood, J.B. and Harkins, S.W. Effects of age, stimulus selection, and retrieval environment on odor identification. J. Gerontol., 1987, 42: 584-588.
38. Wysocki, C.J. and Beauchamp, G.K. Ability to smell androstenone is genetically determined. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. USA, 1984, 81: 4899-4902.