Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 362, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 65-69

  Frasnelli, Johannes ^a   Heilmann, Stefan ^a   Hummel, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DRESDEN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chemosensory; CO2; Event related potentials; Intensity; Mechanosensory; Retronasal; Trigeminal

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; NERVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; NOSE CAVITY; NOSE MUCOSA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

ADULT; CARBON DIOXIDE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NASAL MUCOSA; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

EID: 2442536972     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.059     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aitken R.C. Measurements of feelings using visual analogue scale. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 62:1969;989-996
2. Anton F., Peppel P., Euchner I., Handwerker H.O. Controlled noxious chemical stimulation: responses of rat trigeminal brainstem neurones to CO2 pulses applied to the nasal mucosa. Neurosci. Lett. 123:1991;208-211
3. Becker E., Hummel T., Piel E., Pauli E., Kobal G., Hautzinger M. Olfactory event-related potentials in psychosis-prone subjects. Int. J. Psychol. 15:1993;51-58
4. Cain W.S., Murphy C.L. Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature. 284:1980;255-257
5. Clerico D.M., To W.C., Lanza D.C. Anatomy of the human nasal passage. Doty R.L. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2003;1-16 Marcel Dekker, New York
6. Coles M.G.H., Rugg M.D. Event related brain potentials: an introduction. Rugg M.D., Coles M.G.H. Electrophysiology of Mind. 1995;Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Doty R.L., Brugger W.P.E., Jurs P.C., Orndorff M.A., Snyder P.J., Lowry L.D. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol. Behav. 20:1978;175-185
8. Evans W.J., Cui L., Starr A. Olfactory event-related potentials in normal human subjects: effects of age and gender. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 95:1995;293-301
9. Feron F., Perry C., McGrath J.J., Mackay-Sim A. New techniques for biopsy and culture of human olfactory epithelial neurons. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 124:1998;861-866
10. Finger T.E., Bottger B., Hansen A., Anderson K.T., Alimohammadi H., Silver W.L. Solitary chemoreceptor cells in the nasal cavity serve as sentinels of respiration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:2003;8981-8986
11. Fujita T., Iwananga T., Lee S.H., Terada M. Sensor cells and nerve terminals in some gut-derived organs: a review. Ital. J. Anat. Embryol. 100:1995;197-204
12. Getchell T.V., Getchell M.L. Peripheral mechanisms of olfaction: biochemistry and neurophysiology. Finger T.E., Silver W.L. Neurobiology of Taste and Smell. 1991;Krieger, Malabar
13. Handwerker H., Kobal G. Psychophysiology of experimentally induced pain. Physiol. Rev. 73:1993;639-671
14. Heilmann S., Hummel T. A new method for comparing orthonasal and retronasal olfaction. Behav. Neurosci. 2004;. in press
15. Hummel T., Barz S., Lotsch J., Roscher S., Kettenmann B., Kobal G. Loss of olfactory function leads to a decrease of trigeminal sensitivity. Chem. Senses. 21:1996;75-79
16. Hummel T., Haenel T., Hull D. Assessment of pharyngeal sensitivity to mechanical stimuli using psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 15:2002;321-325
17. Hummel T., Kobal G. Differences in human evoked potentials related to olfactory or trigeminal chemosensory activation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 84:1992;84-89
18. Hummel T., Kobal G. Olfactory event related potentials. Simon S., Nicolelis M. Methods in Chemosensory Research. 2002;CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
19. Hummel T., Livermore A. Intranasal chemosensory function of the trigeminal nerve and aspects of its relation to olfaction. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 75:2002;305-313
20. Hummel T., Livermore A., Hummel C., Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials in man: relation to olfactory and painful sensations elicited by nicotine. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 84:1992;192-195
21. Hummel T., Schiessl C., Wendler J., Kobal G. Peripheral electrophysiological responses decrease in response to repetitive painful stimulation of the human nasal mucosa. Neurosci. Lett. 212:1996;37-40
22. Hummel T., Sekinger B., Wolf S.R., Pauli E., Kobal G. "Sniffin' sticks": olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem. Senses. 22:1997;39-52
23. Jafek B.W. Ultrastructure of human nasal mucosa. Laryngoscope. 93:1983;1576-1599
24. Kettenmann B., Hummel C., Stefan H., Kobal G. Magnetoencephalographical recordings: separation of cortical responses to different chemical stimulation in man. Funct. Neurosci. (EEG Suppl.). 46:1996;287-290
25. Kobal G. Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen des menschlichen Geruchssinns. 1981;Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
26. Kobal G., Klimek L., Wolfensberger M., Gudziol H., Temmel A., Owen C.M., Seeber H., Pauli E., Hummel T. Multicenter investigation of 1, 036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 257:2000;205-211
27. Lee S.H., Iwanaga T., Hoshi O., Adachi I., Fujita T. Regional differences of CGRP-immunoreactive nerve fibers in nasal epithelium of the rat. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 58:1995;117-126
28. Leopold D.A., Hummel T., Schwob J.E., Hong S.C., Knecht M., Kobal G. Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium. Laryngoscope. 110:2000;417-421
29. Livermore A., Hummel T., Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials in the investigation of interactions between the olfactory and the somatosensory (trigeminal) systems. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 83:1992;201-210
30. Pause B.M., Sojka B., Krauel K., Ferstl R. The nature of the late positive complex within the olfactory event-related potential. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;168-172
31. Polich J., Dalessio D.J., Aung M., DeYarman M. Non-invasive trigeminal evoked potentials: normative aging data. Cephalalgia. 15:1995;147-151
32. Sekizawa S., Tsubone H. Nasal mechanoreceptors in guinea pigs. Respir. Physiol. 106:1996;223-230
33. Sekizawa S.I., Tsubone H. Nasal receptors responding to noxious chemical irritants. Respir. Physiol. 96:1994;37-48
34. Stevens J.C., Cain W.S. Aging and the perception of nasal irritation. Physiol. Behav. 37:1986;323-328
35. von Skramlik E. Handbuch der Physiologie der niederen Sinne. 1926;Georg Thieme, Leipzig
36. Wallois F., Macron J.M., Jounieaux V., Duron B. Trigeminal nasal receptors related to respiration and to various stimuli in cats. Respir. Physiol. 85:1991;111-125