Revisiting the variable memory model of visual search

Visual Cognition

Volumn 14, Issue 4-8, 2006, Pages 668-684

  Horowitz, Todd S ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 33745853858     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280500193958     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ahissar, M. and Hochstein, S. (2000) The spread of attention and learning in feature search: Effects of target distribution and task difficulty Vision Research, 40(10-12), pp. 1349-1364.
2. Arani, T. and Karwan, M. H. and Drury, C. G. (1984) A variable-memory model of search Human Factors, 26(6), pp. 631-639.
3. Alvarez, G. A. and Horowitz, T. S. and Wong, A. and Wolfe, J. M. (1999) New evidence against global accumulation of information in visual search Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 40(4), pp. S344.
4. Bricolo, E. and Gianesini, T. and Fanini, A. and Bundesen, C. and Chelazzi, L. (2002) Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A direct behavioral demonstration Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), pp. 980-993.
5. Chua, K. P. and Chun, M. M. (2003) Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent Perception and Psychophysics, 65(1), pp. 72-80.
6. Dodd, M. D. and Castel, A. D. and Pratt, J. (2003) Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search Perception and Psychophysics, 65(7), pp. 1126-1135.
7. Eckstein, M. P. and Thomas, J. P. and Palmer, J. and Shimozaki, S. S. (2000) A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays Perception and Psychophysics, 62(3), pp. 425-451.
8. Gibson, B. S. and Li, L. and Skow, E. and Salvagni, K. and Cooke, L. (2000) Memory-based tagging of targets during visual search for one versus two identical targets Psychological Science, 11(4), pp. 324-328.
9. Gilchrist, I. D. and Harvey, M. (2000) Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search Current Biology, 10(19), pp. 1209-1212.
10. Gilchrist, I. D. and Harvey, M. (2006) Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 704-715.
11. Goolsby, B. A. and Suzuki, S. (2001) Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and "retrieval" Perception and Psychophysics, 63(6), pp. 929-944.
12. Grossberg, S. and Mingolla, E. and Ross, W. D. (1994) A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations Psychological Review, 101(3), pp. 470-489.
13. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000) Repetition effects in visual search Perception and Psychophysics, 62(4), pp. 800-817.
14. Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. (1997) Visual search in the eternal present Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 2, pp. 26.
15. Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. (1998) Visual search has no memory Nature, 394(6693), pp. 575-577.
16. Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. (2001) Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search Perception and Psychophysics, 63(2), pp. 272-285.
17. Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. (2003) Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10(3), pp. 257-298.
18. Horowitz, T. S., Wolfe, J. M., & Birnkrant, R. S.(2003). Search for multiple targets: Search rate depends on what is being remembered. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 11.
19. Itti, L. (2006) Quantitative modelling of perceptual salience at human eye position Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 959-984.
20. Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S.(1977) Urn models and their applications. New York: John Wiley.
21. Klein, R. (1988) Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search Nature, 334, pp. 430-431.
22. Klein, R. M. and MacInnes, W. J. (1999) Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search Psychological Science, 10(4), pp. 346-352.
23. Kristjánsson, A. (2000) In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search Psychological Science, 11(4), pp. 328-332.
24. Kumada, T. and Humphreys, G. W. (2002) Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition Perception and Psychophysics, 64(3), pp. 493-503.
25. Leonards, U. and Rettenbach, R. and Nase, G. and Sireteanu, R. (2002) Perceptual learning of highly demanding visual search tasks Vision Research, 42(18), pp. 2193-2204.
26. Maljkovic, V. and Nakayama, K. (1994) Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features Memory and Cognition, 22(6), pp. 657-672.
27. Maljkovic, V. and Nakayama, K. (1996) Priming of pop-out II: Role of position Perception and Psychophysics, 58(7), pp. 977-991.
28. McCarley, J. S. and Kramer, A. F. and Boot, W. R. and Peterson, M. S. and Wang, R. F. and Irwin, D. E. (2006) Oculomotor behaviour in visual search for multiple targets Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 685-703.
29. McCarley, J. S. and Wang, R. F. and Kramer, A. and Irwin, D. E. and Peterson, M. S. (2003) How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14(5), pp. 422-426.
30. Palmer, J., & McLean, J.(1995). Imperfect, unlimited-capacity, parallel search yields large set-size effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Mathematical Psychology, IrvineCA, USA.
31. Peterson, M. S. and Boot, W. R. and Kramer, A. F. and McCarley, J. S. (2004) Landmarks help guide attention during visual search Spatial Vision, 17, pp. 497-510.
32. Peterson, M. S. and Kramer, A. F. and Wang, R. F. and Irwin, D. E. and McCarley, J. S. (2001) Visual search has memory Psychological Science, 12(4), pp. 287-292.
33. Posner, M. I. and Cohen, Y.(1984) Components of attention. In Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. (pp. 55-66). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
34. Pratt, J. and Abrams, R. A. (1995) Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), pp. 1343-1353.
35. Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention Psychological Review, 84(1), pp. 1-66.
36. Shore, D. I. and Klein, R. M. (2000) On the manifestations of memory in visual search Spatial Vision, 14, pp. 59-75.
37. Takeda, Y.(2004). Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memory-based control of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 71-76.
38. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention Cognitive Psychology, 12, pp. 97-136.
39. Von Muhlenen, A. and Müller, H. J. and Müller, D. (2003) Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search Psychological Science, 14(4), pp. 309-314.
40. Wolfe J. M. (1998a). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
41. Wolfe, J. M. (1998b) What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9(1), pp. 33-39.
42. Wolfe, J. M. and Cave, K. R. and Franzel, S. L. (1989) Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), pp. 419-433.
43. Wright, R. D. and Richard, C. M. (1996) Inhibition of return at multiple locations in visual space Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50(3), pp. 324-327.
44. Zenger, B. and Fahle, M. (1997) Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: A model for error rates in visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(6), pp. 1783-1791.