Landmarks help guide attention during visual search

Spatial Vision

Volumn 17, Issue 4-5, 2004, Pages 497-510

  Peterson, Matthew S ^a   Boot, Walter R ^b   Kramer, Arthur F ^b   McCarley, Jason S ^c  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MOTION PLANNING; PERFORMANCE;

SEARCH PARADIGMS; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION; VISUAL SEARCH;

DATA PROCESSING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 6444230322     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1568568041920230     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boot, W. R., McCarley, J. M., Kramer, A. F. and Peterson, M. S. (2004). Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search, Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (in press).
2. Dickinson, C. A., Chen, X. and Zelinsky, G. J. (2003). Explicitly marking rejected distractors in an overt visual search task, Presented at the 3rd Annual Vision Sciences Conference, Sarasota, FL, USA.
3. Duncan, J. and Humphreys, G. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity, Psychol. Rev. 96, 433-458.
4. Indow, T. (1991). A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space, Psychol. Rev. 98, 430-453.
5. Klein, R. M. and MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search, Psychol. Set. 10, 346-352.
6. McCarley, J. S., Wang, R. F., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E. and Peterson, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychol. Sci. 14, 422-426.
7. Motter, B. C and Belky, E. J. (1998). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search, Vision Research 38, 1805-1815.
8. Müller, H. H. and von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 26, 1591-1605.
9. Paul, M. A. and Tipper, S. P. (2003). Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes, Exper. Brain Res. 148, 283-289.
10. Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., Wang, R. F., Irwin, D. E. and McCarley, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory, Psychol. Sci. 12, 287-292.
11. Posner, M. I. and Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting, in: Attention and Performance X, Bouma, H. and Bouwhuis, D. (Eds), pp. 531-556. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
12. Snyder, J. J. and Kingstone, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception and Psychophysics 62, 452-458.
13. Takeda, Y. and Yagi, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible, Perception and Psychophysics 62, 927-934.
14. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention, Cognitive Psychol. 12, 97-136.
15. Werner, S. and Diedrichsen, J. (2002). The time course of spatial memory distortions, Memory and Cognition 30, 718-730.
16. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search, Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 1, 202-238.