Contingency knowledge is necessary for learned motivated behaviour in humans: Relevance for addictive behaviour

Addiction

Volumn 101, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1153-1166

  Hogarth, Lee ^a   Dickinson, Anthony ^b   Hutton, Sam B ^a   Bamborough, Helen ^a   Duka, Theodora ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Addiction; Attentional bias; Avoidance; Conditioning; Emotion

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MEASUREMENT; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; TRAINING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EMOTIONS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTIVATION;

EID: 33745781472     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01459.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baker, T. B., Piper, M. E., McCarthy, D. E., Majeskie, M. R. & Fiore, M. C. (2004) Addiction motivation reformulated: an affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychological Review, 111, 33-51.
2. Bolles, R. C. (1972) Reinforcement, expectancy and learning. Psychological Review, 79, 394-409.
3. Carter, B. L. & Tiffany, S. T. (2001) The cue-availability paradigm: the effects of cigarette availability on cue reactivity in smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacolagy, 9, 183-190.
4. Colwill, R. M. & Rescorla, R. A. (1988) Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 155-164.
5. Dawson, M. E. & Grings, W. W. (1968) Comparison of classical conditioning and relational learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 227-231.
6. Dickinson, A. (1997) Bolles's psychological syllogism. In: Bouton, M. & Fanselow, M., eds. Learning, Motivation and Cognition, pp. 345-367. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Dickinson, A. (2001) The 28th Bartlett Memorial Lecture Causal learning: an associative analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B - Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 3-25.
8. Dols, M., Willems, B., van den Hout, M. & Bittoun, R. (2000) Smokers can learn to influence their urge to smoke. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 103-108.
9. Droungas, A., Ehrman, R., Childress, A. & O'Brien, C. (1995) Effects of smoking cues and cigarette availability on craving and smoking behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 20, 657-673.
10. Dua, J. K. (1980) Counterconditioning, hierarchy, and CS exposure in extinction of human avoidance responding. Psychological Reports, 46, 1139-1150.
11. Ehrman, R. N., Robbins, S. J., Bromwell, M. A., Lankford, M. E., Monterosso, J. R. & O'Brien, C. P. (2002) Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 67, 185-191.
12. Eissenberg, T. (2004) Measuring the emergence of tobacco dependence: the contribution of negative reinforcement models. Addiction, 99, 5-29.
13. Field, M. & Duka, T. (2001) Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues. Behavioural Pharmacology, 12, 183-194.
14. Field, M. & Duka, T. (2004) Cue reactivity in smokers: the effects of perceived cigarette availability and gender. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 78, 647-652.
15. Field, M., Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. (2004) Eye movements to smoking-related cues: effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology, 173, 116-123.
16. Geier, A., Mucha, R. F. & Pauli, P. (2000) Appetitive nature of drug cues confimed with physiological measures in a model using pictures of smoking. Psychopharmacology, 150, 283-291.
17. Glautier, S. (2004) Measures and models of nicotine dependence: positive reinforcement. Addiction, 99, 30-50.
18. Grings, W. W., Schell, A. M. & Carey, C. A. (1973) Verbal control of an autonomic response in a cue reversal situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 215-221.
19. Hogarth, L., Dickinson, A. & Duka, T. (2003b) Discriminative stimuli that control instrumental tobacco-seeking by human smokers also command selective attention. Psychopharmacology, 168, 435-445.
20. Hogarth, L., Dickinson, A. & Duka, T. (2005) Explicit knowledge of stimulus-outcome contingencies and stimulus control of selective attention and instrumental action in human smoking behaviour. Psychopharmacology, 177, 428-437.
21. Hogarth, L. & Duka, T. (2006) Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated? Psychopharmacology, 184, 553-566.
22. Hogarth, L., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Duka, T. & Dickinson, A. (2003a) Attentional orienting towards smoking-related stimuli. Behavioural Pharmacology, 14, 153-160.
23. Juliano, L. M. & Brandon, T. H. (1998) Reactivity to instructed smoking availability and environmental cues: evidence with urge and reaction time. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 45-53.
24. Lazev, A., Herzog, T. & Brandon, T. (1999) Classical conditioning of environmental cues to cigarette smoking. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 56-63.
25. Lovibond, P. F. (2003) Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Learning Memory and Cognition, 29, 97-106.
26. Lovibond, P. F. (2004) Cognitive processes in extinction. Learning and Memory, 11, 495-500.
27. Lovibond, P. F. & Shanks, D. R. (2002) The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3-26.
28. Lubman, D. I., Peters, L. A., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P. & Deakin, J. F. W. (2000) Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence. Psychological Medicine, 30, 169-175.
29. Malloy, P. & Levis, D. J. (1988) A laboratory demonstration of persistent human avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 19, 229-241.
30. Miller, F. D., Kalin, R. S. & Meyer, P. A. (1970) The effects of temporal variables on the acquisition of human avoidance behaviour. Psychonomic Science, 21, 241-243.
31. Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Field, M. & De Houwer, J. (2003) Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction, 98, 825-836.
32. Orain-Pelissolo, S., Grillon, C., Perez-Diaz, F. & Jouvent, R. (2004) Lack of startle modulation by smoking cues in smokers. Psychopharmacology, 173, 160-166.
33. Perkins, K. A., Epstein, L. H., Grobe, J. & Fonte, C. (1994) Tobacco abstinence, smoking cues, and the reinforcing value of smoking. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 47, 107-112.
34. Perruchet, P. (1985) A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 20, 163-170.
35. Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of drug addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247-291.
36. Sayette, M. A., Wertz, J. M., Martin, C. S., Cohn, J. F., Perrott, M. A. & Hobel, J. (2003) Effects of smoking opportunity on cue-elicited urge: a facial coding analysis. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 218-227.
37. Seligman, M. E. P. & Johnston, J. C. (1973) A cognitive theory of avoidance learning. In: McGuigan, F. J. & Lumsden, D. B., eds. Contemporary Approaches to Conditioning and Learning, pp. 69-110. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston and Sons.
38. Siegel, S. (1989) Pharmacological conditioning and drug effects. In: Goudie, A. & Emmett-Oglesby, M., eds. Psychoactive Drugs Tolerance and Sensitisation, pp. 115-180. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
39. Solomon, R. L. & Corbit, J. D. (1973) An opponent-process theory of motivation. II. Cigarette addiction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81, 158-171.
40. Solomon, R. L. & Corbit, J. D. (1974) An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81, 119-145.
41. Stewart, J., de Wit, H. & Eikelboom, R. (1984) Role of conditioned and unconditioned drug effects in self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychological Review, 63, 251-268.
42. Unger, W., Evans, I. M., Rourke, P. & Levis, D. J. (2003) The S-S construct of expectancy versus the S-R construct of fear: which motivates the acquisition of avoidance behavior? Journal of General Psychology, 130, 131-147.
43. Weiner, H. (1969) Conditioning history and the control of human avoidance and escape responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 1039-1043.
44. Weisman, R. G. & Litner, J. S. (1972) The role of Pavlovian events in avoidance training. In: Boakes, R. A. & Halliday, M. S., eds. Inhibition and Learning, pp. 253-270. London: Academic Press.
45. Wertz, J. M. & Sayette, M. A. (2001a) Effects of smoking opportunity on attentional bias in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 268-271.
46. Wertz, J. M. & Sayette, M. A. (2001b) A review of the effects of perceived drug use opportunity of self-reported urge. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 3-13.
47. Williams, R. W. & Levis, D. J. (1991) A demonstration of persistent human avoidance in extinction. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 125-127.
48. Wilson, S. J., Sayette, M. A. & Fiez, J. A. (2004) Prefrontal responses to drug cues: a neurocognitive analysis. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 211-214.