Cue reactivity in smokers: The effects of perceived cigarette availability and gender

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 647-652

  Field, Matt ^a   Duka, Theodora ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Craving; Gender differences; Salivation; Skin conductance; Smoking

Indexed keywords

CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME;

ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SALIVATION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SKIN; SMOKING;

EID: 3142648793     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.03.026     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Benowitz N.L., Hatsukami D. Gender differences in the pharmacology of nicotine addiction. Addict. Biol. 3:1998;383-404
2. Carter B.L., Tiffany S.T. The cue-availability paradigm: the effects of cigarette availability on cue reactivity in smokers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 17:2001;183-190
3. Cox L.S., Tiffany S.T., Christen A.G. Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine Tob. Res. 3:2001;7-16
4. Dols M., Willems B., Van Den Hout M., Bittoun R. Smokers can learn to influence their urge to smoke. Addict. Behav. 25:2000;103-108
5. Dols M., van den Hout M., Kindt M., Willems B. The urge to smoke depends on the expectation of smoking. Addiction. 97:2001;87-93
6. Drobes D.J., Tiffany S.T. Induction of smoking urge through imaginal and in vivo procedures: physiological and self-report manifestations. J. Abnorm. Psychology. 106:1997;15-25
7. Droungas A., Ehrman R.N., Childress A.R., O'Brien C.P. Effect of smoking cues and cigarette availability on craving and smoking behaviour. Addict. Behav. 20:1995;657-673
8. Duka T., Tasker R., Russell K., Stephens D.N. Discriminative properties of nicotine at low doses: the effects of caffeine preload. Behav. Pharmacol. 9:1998;219-229
9. Fagerstrom K.O. Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualisation of treatment. Addict. Behav. 3:1978;235-241
10. Field M., Duka T. Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues. Behav. Pharmacol. 12:2001;183-194
11. Hogarth L.C., Mogg K., Bradley B.P., Duka T., Dickinson A. Attentional orienting towards smoking-related stimuli. Behav. Pharmacol. 14:2003;153-160
12. Juliano L.M., Brandon T.H. Reactivity to instructed smoking availability and environmental cues: evidence with urge and reaction time. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 6:1998;45-53
13. Lezak M.D. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. 1995;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
14. Morgan M.J., Davies G.M., Willner P. The questionnaire of smoking urges is sensitive to abstinence and exposure to smoking-related cues. Behav. Pharmacol. 10:1999;619-626
15. Niaura R., Shadel W.G., Abrams D.B., Monti P.M., Rohsenow D.J., Sirota A. Individual differences in cue reactivity among smokers trying to quit: effects of gender and cue type. Addict. Behav. 23:1998;209-224
16. Otis J., Ley R. The effects of frustration induced by discontinuation of reinforcement on force of response and magnitude of the skin conductance response. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 31:1993;97-100
17. Perkins K.A. Sex differences in nicotine versus nonnicotine reinforcement as determinants of tobacco smoking. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 4:1996;166-177
18. Perkins K.A. Nicotine discrimination in men and women. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 64:1999;1-5
19. Perkins K.A., Donny E., Caggiula A.R. Sex differences in nicotine effects and self-administration: review of human and animal evidence. Nicotine Tob. Res. 1:1999;301-315
20. Perkins K.A., Gerlach D., Vender J., Grobe J., Meeker J., Hutchison S. Sex differences in the subjective and reinforcing effects of visual and olfactory cigarette smoke stimuli. Nicotine Tob. Res. 3:2001;141-150
21. Robbins S.J., Ehrman R.N., Childress A.R., O'Brien C.P. Comparing levels of cocaine cue reactivity in male and female outpatients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 53:1999;223-230
22. Tiffany S., Conklin C.A. A cognitive processing model of alcohol craving and compulsive alcohol use. Addiction. 95(Suppl. 2):2000;S145-S153
23. Wertz J.M., Sayette M.A. A review of the effects of perceived drug use opportunity on self-reported urge. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 9:2001;3-13