Fracture Resistance and Marginal Adaptation of Conventionally Cemented Fiber-Reinforced Composite Three-Unit FPDs

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 467-472

  Behr, Michael ^a   Rosentritt, Martin ^a   Ledwinsky, Elke ^a   Handel, Gerhard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELLEGLASS; DENTAL POLYGLASS; FIBERKOR, SCULPTURE; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILICATE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ELASTICITY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLAR TOOTH;

CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; ELASTICITY; GLASS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; POLYETHYLENES; SILICATE CEMENT; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0036718092     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gregory WA, Berry S, Duke E, Dennison JB. Physical properties and repair bond strength of direct and indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:406-411.
2. Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brunson D, Robertson TM. Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater 1989;5: 417-424.
3. Buonocore MA. A simple method of increasing adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34: 849-853.
4. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mat Res 1982;16:265-273.
5. Silverstone LM, Hicks MM, Featherstone MJ, Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces. An SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;111:329-332.
6. O'Brien JA, Relief DH, Denys FR. Effects of saliva contamination and phosphoric acid composition on bond strength. Dent Mater 1987;3:296-302.
7. Kistler ST, Pospiech P, Frasch C, Rammelsberg P. Clinical performance of multiunit Targis/Vectris fibre-reinforced bridges: Preliminary results [abstract 185]. J Dent Res 2001;80:1292.
8. Goehring TN, Moermann WH, Lutz F. Clinical and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: Preliminary results after one year. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:662-668.
9. Vallittu PK, Sevelius C. Resin-bonded glass-fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:413-418.
10. Sidhu SK, Sheriff TF. Resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Part 1 : Properties. Dent Update 1995;22:429-432.
11. White SN, Yu Z. Compressive and diametral tensile strengths of current adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:156-161.
12. Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:387-391.
13. Scharnagl P. Simulation der Physiologischen Zahnbeweglichkeit bei der In-Vitro-Belastungsprüfung Dentaler Restaurationen im "Regensburger Kausimulator." Untersuchung am Beispiel Vollkeramischer In-Ceram-Brücken [thesis]. Regensburg, Germany: University of Regensburg, 1998.
14. Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Lang R, Behr M, Handel G. Gerät zur Simulation des Kauorganes (Kausimulator). Materialprufung 1977;39:77-80.
15. Behr M, Hindelang U, Rosentritt M, Lang G, Handel G. Comparison of failure rates of adhesive-fixed partial dentures for in vivo and in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:25-30.
16. Roulet JF, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack MJ. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc 1998;3:147-159.
17. Steinbrenner H, Eickholtz P, Staehle HJ. Zur Reproduzierbarkeit der qualitativen und quantitativen Randspaltanalyse. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1995;50:920-923.
18. Ekfeldt A, Flöystrand F, Öilo G. Replica techniques for in vivo studies of tooth surfaces and prosthetic materials. Scand J Dent Res 1985;93:560-565.
19. Loose M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel C. In-vitro study of fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced-composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 1998;6:55-62.
20. Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of polyethylene-fibre-reinforced versus glass-fibre-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil (forthcoming).
21. Takagi K, Fujimatsu H, Usami H, Ogawara S. Adhesion between high strength and high modulus polyethylene fibres by use of polyethylene gel as an adhesive. J Adhesion Sci Technol 1996;9: 869-882.
22. Goldberg AJ, Haser KA, Freilich MA. Flexure properties and thickness effects for restorative composites [abstract 955]. J Dent Res 2001;80:155.
23. Körber KH, Ludwig P. Maximale Kaukraft als Berechnungsfaktor zahntechnischer Konstruktionen. Dent Labor 1983;31:55-60.