Discursive construction of a high-stakes test: The many faces of a test-taker

Language Testing

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 326-350

  Huhta, Ari ^a   Kalaja, Paula ^a   Pitkänen Huhta, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745744973     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: 14770946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0265532206lt331oa     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alderson, J.C. and Hamp-Lyons, L. 1996: TOEFL preparation courses: a study of washback. Language Testing 13, 280-97.
2. Alderson, J.C. and Wall, D. 1993: Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics 14, 116-29.
3. Bailey, K. 1996: Working for washback: a review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing 13, 257-79.
4. Berwick, R. and Ross, S. 1996: Cross-cultural pragmatics in oral proficiency interview strategies. In Milanovic, M. and Saville, N., editors, Performance testing, cognition and assessment: selected papers from the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 34-54.
5. Bradshaw, J. 1990: Test-takers' reactions to a placement test. Language Testing 7, 13-30.
6. Brown, A. 1993: The role of test-taker feedback in the test development process: test-takers' reactions to a tape-mediated test of proficiency in spoken Japanese. Language Testing 10, 277-303.
7. Brown, A. 2003: Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing 20, 1-25.
8. Brown, A. and Hill, K. 1998: Interviewer style and candidate performance in the IELTS oral interview. In Woods, S., editor, Research Reports 1997. Volume 1. Sydney: ELICOS, 173-91.
9. Brown, A. and Iwashita, N. 1996: Language background and item difficulty: the development of a computer-adaptive test of Japanese. System 24, 199-206.
10. Cheng, L. and Watanabe, Y., editors, 2004: Washback in language testing: research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Cohen, A. 1984: On taking language tests: what the students report. Language Testing, 70-81.
12. Council of Europe 2001: Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Davison, C. 2004: The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing 21, 305-35.
14. Edley, N. 2001: Analysing masculinity: interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. and Yates, S.J., editors, Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. London: Sage (in association with The Open University), 189-228.
15. Fox, J. 2001: It's all about meaning: L2 test validation in and through the landscape of an evolving construct. PhD thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
16. Hamayan, E. 1995: Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 15, 212-26.
17. Hamp-Lyons, L. and Lynch, B. 1998: Perspectives on validity: a historical analysis of language testing conference abstracts. In Kurman, A., editor, Validation in language assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 253-76.
18. Heikkinen, A. 1999: A discourse analysis of success and failure accounts in learning English as a foreign language. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Jyväskylä. Available at: http:// selene.lib.jyu.fi:8080/gradu/g/1570.pdf (March 2006).
19. Heikkinen, A. and Kalaja, P. 2001: 'Imin kieltä itseeni kuin pesusieni': selityksiä vieraan kielen oppijoiden menestymiselle ja epäonnistumiselle ['I absorbed the language like a sponge': explanations for success and failure given by EFL learners]. In Charles, M. and Hiidenmaa, P., editors, Tietotyön yhteiskunta: kielen valtakunta [Information society: language realm]. AFinLA yearbook 59, Jyväskylä: AFinLA, 197-223.
20. Huhta, A., Takala, S. and Sajavaara, K. 1993: Recent developments in national examinations in Finland. In Huhta, A., Sajavaara, K. and Takala, S., editors, Language testing: new openings. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä, 136-59.
21. Hubta, A., Kalaja, P. and Pitkänen-Huhta, A. 2000: 'Tuntuu tosi tosi tosi hyvältä. JIPII': ylioppilaskokeiden ja niihin osallistumisen rakenturminen abiturientin päiväkirjamerkinnöissä ['It feels really really really good ... YIPPEE': the construction of the Matriculation Examination and taking the exam in a student's diary entries]. In Kalaja, P. and L. Nieminen, editors, Kielikoulussa: kieli koulussa [Language schools: languages in schools]. AFinLA yearbook 58, Jyväskylä: AFinLA, 221-42.
22. Isomöttönen, A. 2003: A discursive study of hard-of-hearing learners' explanations for failure and success in learning English as a foreign language. MA thesis, University of Jyväskylä. Available at: http://selene.lib.jyu.fi:8080/gradu/v04/G0000417.pdf (March 2006).
23. Jacoby, S. and McNamara, T. 1999: Locating competence. English for Specific Purposes 18, 214-41.
24. Kaftandjieva, F. and Takala, S. 2002: Relating the Finnish matriculation examination English test results to the CEF scales. Paper given at a seminar on relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference, organised by the European Council, in Helsinki June 31 through August 2, 2002.
25. Kalaja, P. 1995: Student beliefs (or metacognitive knowledge) about SLA reconsidered. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5, 191-204.
26. Kalaja, P. 2003: Research on student beliefs about SLA within a discursive approach. In Kalaja, P. and Barcelos, A.M.F., editors, Beliefs about SLA: new research approaches, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, 87-108.
27. Kalaja, P. 2004: 'So maybe Freddie (Mercury) and his band mates really are to blame': explaining success (or failure) in learning EFL. In Mäkinen, K., Kaikkonen, P. and Kohonen, V., editors, Future perspectives in foreign language education. Oulu: Oulu University Press, 123-32.
28. Kalaja, P. and Leppänen, S. 1998: Towards discursive social psychology of second language learning: the case of motivation. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 33, 165-80.
29. Kim, M. 2001: Detecting DIF across the different language groups in a speaking test. Language Testing 18, 89-114.
30. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991: Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lazaraton, A. 1996: Interlocutor support in oral proficiency interviews: the case of CASE. Language Testing 13, 151-72.
32. Leppänen, S. and Kalaja, P. 2002: Autobiographies as constructions of EFL learner identities and experiences. In Kärkkäinen, E., Haines, J. and Lauttamus, T., editors, Studia linguistica et litteraria septentrionalia: studies presented to Heikki Nyyssönen. Oulu: University of Oulu, 189-203.
33. Leung, C. and Mohan, B. 2004, Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing 21, 335-59.
34. Lindström, A. 1998: Ylioppilastutkinnon muotoutuminen autonomian aikana [The development of the Matriculation Examination in the period of Finnish autonomy]. Russian rule in the 1800s. Research report 6. Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä.
35. Lynch, B. 2001: Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. Language Testing 18, 351-72.
36. McNamara, T. 1997: 'Interaction' in second language performance assessment: whose performance? Applied Linguistics 18, 446-65.
37. McNamara, T. 2001: Language assessment as social practice: challenges for research. Language Testing 18, 333-49.
38. McNamara, T., Hill, K. and May, L. 2002: Discourse and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 221-42.
39. Messick, S. 1993: Validity. In Linn, R., editor, Educational measurement. Third edition. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press, 13-103.
40. Norton, B. 2000: Identity and language learning: gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.
41. O'Loughlin, K. 2000: The impact of gender in the IELTS oral interview. In Tulloh, R., editor, IELTS Research Reports. Volume 3. Canberra: IELTS Australia, 1-28.
42. Pavlenko, A. and Blackledge, A., editors, 2004: Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
43. Peirce, B.N. and Stein, P. 1995: Why the 'Monkeys passage' bombed: tests, genres, and teaching. Harvard Educational Review 65, 50-65.
44. Pitkänen-Huhta, A., Kalaja, P. and Huhta, A. 2002: Abiturientit ja ylioppilastutkinto: monta tapaa puhua englannin kielen kokeesta [Students and the Matriculation Examination: many ways to talk about the English test]. Tempus 1, 26-27.
45. Potter, J. 2003: Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In Camic, P.M., Rhodes, J.E. and Yardley, L., editors, Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 73-94. Available at: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jonathan.potter1/JP%20Articles/M4DAHB.pdf (March 2006).
46. Potter, J. 2004: Discourse analysis. In Hardy, M. and Bryman, A., editors, Handbook of data analysis. Sage: London, 607-24.
47. Potter, J. and Edwards, D. 2001: Discursive social psychology. In Robinson, W.P. and Giles, H., editors, The new handbook of language and social psychology. London: John Wiley & Sons, 103-18.
48. Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. 1987: Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour London: Sage.
49. Rea-Dickins, P. 2001: Mirror, mirror on the wall: identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing 18, 429-62.
50. Rea-Dickins, P. and Gardner, S. 2000: Snares and silver bullets: disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing 17, 215-43.
51. Sawaki, Y. 2001: Comparability of conventional and computerized tests of reading in a second language. Language Learning & Technology 5, 38-59.
52. Schiffrin, D. 1994: Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
53. Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H., editors, 2001: The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
54. Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S. and Ferman, I. 1996: Test impact revisited: washback effect over time. Language Testing 13, 298-317.
55. Tarnanen, M. 2002: Arvioija valokiilassa: suomi toisena kielenäkirjoittamisen arviointia [The rater in a spotlight: rating Finnish as a second language writing]. Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyväskylä.
56. Taylor, C., Kirsch, I., Eignor, D. and Jamieson, J. 1999: Examining the relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based language tasks. Language Learning 49, 219-74.
57. Teasdale, A. and Leung, C. 2000: Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: a case of paradigm crossing? Language Testing 17, 163-80.
58. Uiterwijk, H. and Vallen, T. 2005: Linguistic sources of item bias for second generation immigrants in Dutch tests. Language Testing 22, 211-34.
59. Wall, D. 2000: The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: can this be predicted or controlled. System 28, 499-509.
60. Wall, D. and Alderson. J.C. 1993: Examining washback: the Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing 10, 41-69.
61. Wenger, E. 1998: Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. and Yates, S.J., editors, 2001a: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage.
63. Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. and Yates, S.J., editors, 2001b: Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. London: Sage. In association with The Open University.