Influencing the national policy process: The role of health consumer groups

Health Expectations

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 18-28

  Jones, Kathryn ^a   Baggott, Rob ^a   Allsop, Judith ^a  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health consumer groups; Interests groups; Participation; Policy process; Representation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE POLICY; INCOME; INTERVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INCOME; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 1242295186     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00238.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. DOH. Patient Partnership: Building a Collaborative Strategy. London: DOH, 1996.
2. DOH. A First Class Service Quality in the New NHS. Wetherby: DOH, 1998.
3. DOH. Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. London: DOH, 1999.
4. DOH. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform, Cm 4818-1. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.
5. DOH. The Expert Patient: a New Approach to Disease Management for the 21st Century. London: DOH, 2001.
6. Alford R. Health Care Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
7. Hogg C. Patients and Power: Health Policy from a User Perspective. London: Sage, 1975.
8. Barnes M, Harrison S, Mort M, Shardlow P, Wistow G. The New Management of Community Care: User Groups, Citizenship and Co-production. In: Stoker G (ed.) The New Management of British Local Governance. London: Macmillan, 1999: 112-117.
9. Quennell P. Getting their say, or getting their way? Has participation strengthened the patient "voice" in the National Institute for Clinical Excellence? Journal of Management in Medicine, 2001; 15: 201-219.
10. Hogg C. National Service Frameworks: Involving Patients and the Public. London: Patients Forum, 2001.
11. Weeks J, Aggleton P, McKevitt C, Parkinson K, Taylor-Labourn A. Community and contracts: tensions and dilemmas in the voluntary sector response to HIV and AIDS. Policy Studies, 1996; 17: 107-123.
12. Wood B. Patient Power? The Political Effectiveness of Patients' Associations. Buckinghamshire: OUP, 2000.
13. Baggott R, Allsop J, Jones K. Speaking for Patients? Health Consumer Groups and the National Policy Process. Palgrave, 2004 (forthcoming).
14. Wood B. Patient Power? The Political Effectiveness of Patients' Associations. Buckinghamshire: OUP, 2000; 36.
15. Jennings MK. Political responses to pain and loss: presidential address 1998 American Political Science Association. American Political Science Review, 1999; 93: 1-15.
16. Evers A. Part of the welfare mix: the third sector as an intermediate area between market economy, state and community. Voluntas, 1995; 6: 159-182.
17. Wood B. Patient Power? The Political Effectiveness of Patients' Associations. Buckinghamshire: OUP, 2000.
18. Passey A, Hems L, Jas P. The UK Voluntary Sector Almanac. London: NCVO Publications, 2000.
19. Wood B. Patient Power? The Political effectiveness of Patients' Associations. Buckinghamshire: OUP, 2000; 64.
20. Trojan A. Benefits of self-help groups. Social Science and Medicine, 1989; 29: 225-232.
21. Small N, Rhodes P. Too Ill to Talk? User Involvement in Palliative Care. London: Routledge, 2000.
22. Baggott R, Allsop J, Jones K. Speakingfor Patients? Health Consumer Groups and the National Policy Process. Palgrave, 2004 (forthcoming).
23. DOH. The Expert Patient: a New Approach to Disease Management for the 21st Century. London: DOH, 2001.
24. National Schizophrenia Fellowship, Manic Depression Fellowship, MIND. A Question of Choice. London: NSF, 2002.
25. Hogg C. National Service Frameworks: Involving Patients and the Public. London: Patients Forum, 2001.
26. McMurry P. Just rewards. The Guardian - Society, 2001; 25: 9.