Effects of communication environment, immediacy, and communication apprehension on cognitive and affective learning

Communication Monographs

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 184-200

  Messman, Susan J ^a   Jones Corley, Jennifer ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cognitive and Affective Learning; Communication Apprehension; Communication Environment; Immediacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040440331     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03637750128054     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abelson, R.P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129-133.
2. Allen, M. (1998). Methodological considerations when examining a gendered world. In D.J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.) Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 427-444). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3, (pp. 543-560). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
4. Bloom, B.S. (1956). A taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
5. Bourhis, J., & Allen, M. (1992). Meta-analysis of the relationship between communication apprehension and cognitive performance. Communication Education, 41, 68-76.
6. Buerkel-Rothfuss, N.L., & Weaver II, R.L. (1993). Teaching formats: Large lecture versus small sections. In L.W. Hugenberg, Gray, P.L., & D.M. Trank (Eds.), Teaching and directing the basic communications course (pp. 203-211). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
7. Cheatham, R., & Jordan, W. (1976). Cognitive and affective implications of class size in a lecture-practicum speech communication course. Improving College and University Teaching, 24, 251-254.
8. Christensen, L.J., & Menzel, K.E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82-90.
9. Christophel, D.M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
10. Comadena, M.E., & Prusank, D.T. (1988). Communication apprehension and academic achievement among elementary and middle school students. Communication Education, 37, 270-277.
11. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., & Bowers, J.W. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44, 251-266.
12. Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
13. De Cecco, J.P. (1964). Class size and co-ordinated instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 65-74.
14. Eagly, A.H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
15. Eash, M.J., & Bennett, C.M. (1964). The effect of class size on achievement and attitudes. American Educational Research Journal, 1, 229-239.
16. Educational Research Service. (1980). Class size research: A critique of recent meta-analyses. Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 239-241.
17. Frymier, A.B. (1993). The impact of teacher immediacy on students' motivation: Is it the same for all students? Communication Quarterly, 41, 454-464.
18. Frymier, A.B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144.
19. Frymier, A.B., & Thompson, C.A. (1995). Using student reports to measure immediacy: Is it a valid methodology? Communication Research Reports, 12, 85-93.
20. Garside, C. (1996). Look who's talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills. Communication Education, 45, 212-227.
21. Glass, G.V., & Smith, M.L. (1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2-16.
22. Gorham, J., & Zakahi, W.R. (1990). A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product. Communication Education, 39, 354-368.
23. Gray, P.L., Buerkel-Rothfuss, N.L., Yerby, J. (1986). A comparison between PSI-based lecture-recitation formats of instruction in the introductory speech communication course. Communication Education, 35, 111-277.
24. Hayter, J. (1979). How good is the lecture as a Leaching method. Nursing Outlook, 27, 274-277.
25. Hedges, L.V., & Stock, W. (1983). The effects of class size: An examination of rival hypotheses. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 63-85.
26. Hoover, K.H., Baumann, V.H., & Shafer, S.M. (1970). The influence of class-size variations on cognitive and affective learning of college freshman. Journal of Experimental Education, 38, 39-43.
27. Kelley, D.H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37, 198-207.
28. Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.C. (1989). Class and school organizations. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 309-318.
29. McCroskey, J.C. (1982). Introduction to rhetorical communication (4th ed.). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30. McCroskey, J.C. (1984). The communication apprehensive perspective. In J.A. Daly & J.C. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 13-38). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31. McCroskey, J.C., & Andersen, J.A. (1976). The relationship between communication apprehension and academic achievement among college students. Human Communication Research, 3, 73-81.
32. McCroskey, J.C., Daly, J.A., & Sorensen, G.A. (1976). Personality correlates of communication apprehension. Human Communication Research, 2, 376-380.
33. McCroskey, J.C., Richmond, V.P., Plax, T.G., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214-226.
34. McCroskey, J.C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J.M., Richmond, V.P., & Barraclough, R.A. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 45, 200-211.
35. th ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
36. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bullentin, 71, 359-372.
37. Meredith, G.M., & Ogasawara, T.H. (1982). Preference for class size in lecture-format courses among college students. Psychological Reports, 51, 961-962.
38. Moore, A., Masterton, J.T., Christophel, D.M., & Shea, K.A. (1996). College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 45, 29-39.
39. Neuliep, J.W. (1995). A comparison of teacher immediacy in African-American and Euro-American college classrooms. Communication Education, 44, 267-277.
40. Norton, R.W., & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Dramatic behaviors of the effective teacher. Communication yearbook, 4, (pp. 565-582). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
41. O'Mara, J., Allen, J.L., Long, K.M., & Judd, B. (1996). Communication apprehension, nonverbal immediacy, and negative expectations for learning. Communication Research Reports, 13, 109-128.
42. Plax, T.G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, & Richmond, V.P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.
43. Richmond, V.P., Gorham, J.S., & McCroskey, J.C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M.A. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10, (pp. 574-590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Richmond, V.P., & McCroskey, J.C. (1998). Communication apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
45. Rodriquez, J.I., Plax, T.G., Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 292-305.
46. Rovin, S., Lalonde, E., & Haley, J.H. (1972). An assessment of the lecture. Improving College and University Teaching, 22, 326-327.
47. Sanders, J.A., & Wiseman, R.L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341-358.
48. Shaughnessy, M.F. (1995). Delivery of the knowledge curriculum vs. skill and competency curriculum. ERIC Document ED384286.
49. Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Slavin, R.E. (1984). Meta-analysis in education: How has it been used? Educational Researcher, 13, 6-15.
51. Smith, M.L., & Glass, G.V. (1980). Meta-analysis of research on class size and its relationship to attitudes and instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 419-433.