Nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of trustworthiness in teacher-supervisor relationships

Communication Education

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 352-364

  Chamberlin, Carla R ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Immediacy; Teacher supervisor relationships; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034556524     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520009379223     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Andersen, P. A. (1985). Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Andersen, P. A. (1989). A cognitive valence theory of intimate communication. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the International Network on Personal Relationships, Iowa City, IA.
3. Andersen, P., & Andersen, J. (1982). Nonverbal immediacy in instruction. In L. Barker (Ed.), Communication in the classroom (pp. 98-120). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Blumberg, A. (1980). Supervisors and teachers: A private cold war, 2nd edition. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
5. Blumberg, A., & Jonas, R. D. (1987). Permitting access: The teacher's control over supervision. Educational Leadership, 44(8), 58-63.
6. Britzman, D. P. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
7. Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Comstock, J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1-24.
8. Burgoon, J. K., (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp, & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 229-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193-214.
10. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54, 19-41.
11. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58-79.
12. Burgoon, J. K., & LePoire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20, 67-96.
13. Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1985). Loneliness and relationally competent communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 387-402.
14. Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1987). Appropriateness and effectiveness perceptions of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research, 14, 93-118.
15. Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1989). A model of the perceived competence of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research, 15, 630-649.
16. Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1990). Attribution biases and associations between conflict strategies and competence outcomes. Communication Monographs, 57, 139-151.
17. Cappella, J. N. (1981). Mutual influence in expressive behavior: Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 101-132.
18. Cappella, J. N. (1983). Conversational involvement: Approaching and avoiding others. In J. M. Weimann & R. P. Harrison (Eds.), Nonverbal Interaction (pp. 113-148). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Cappella, J. N. (1985). Controlling the floor in conversation. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 69-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 89-114.
21. Christensen, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82-90.
22. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
23. Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Coker, D. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1987). The nature of conversational involvement and nonverbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research, 13, 463-494.
25. Collier, M. J., & Powell, R. G. (1986, May). The effect of student culture/ethnicity on judgments of instructional communication. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Chicago, Illinois.
26. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., & Bowers, J. W. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44, 251-66.
27. Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
28. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201-215.
29. Darling-Hammond, L. (1986). Teaching knowledge: How do we test it? American Educator, 10, 18-21, 46.
30. Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1985). Patterns of visual dominance in humans. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-149). New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. Freeman, D. (1996). The "unstudied problem": Research on teacher learning in language teaching. In D. Freeman, & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 351-378). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Frymier, A. B., & Thompson, C. A. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41, 389-399.
33. Fusani, D. S. (1994). "Extra-class" communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 232-255.
34. Garman, N. B. (1982). The clinical approach to supervision. In T. J. Sergiovanni (Ed.), Supervision of teaching (pp. 35-52). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
35. Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. (3rd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
36. Goldsbeny, L. (1986). Is clinical supervision practical? In W. J. Smyth (Ed.), Learning about teaching through clinical supervision. London: Croom Helm Inc.
37. Goodman, J. (1984). Reflection and teacher education: A case study and theoretical analysis. Interchange, 15, 9-26.
38. Gorham, J., & Zakahi, W. R. (1990). A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product. Communication Education, 39, 354-368.
39. Guerrero, L. K., & Miller, T. A. (1998). Associations between nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education courses. Communication Education, 47, 30-42.
40. Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39, 196-206.
41. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Harper, R. G. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: An overview. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 29-48). New York: Springer-Verlag.
43. Harris, B. M. (1997). Is a collegial relationship possible between supervisors and teachers? No. In Galnz, J., & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 144-154). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
44. Heishberger, R., & Young, J. (1975). Teacher perceptions of supervision and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 57, 210.
45. Holland, P. E. (1989). Implicit assumptions about the supervisory conference: A review and analysis of literature. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4, 362-379.
46. Hunter, M. (1986). The Hunter model of clinical supervision. A practical guide for instructional supervision: A tool for administrators and supervisors. Curriculum and Instruction Leaders Committee: Association of California School Administrators.
47. Irvine, J. (1986). Teacher-student interactions: Effects of student race, sex, and grade level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 14-21.
48. Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48, 41-47.
49. Jourard, S. M. (1971). The transparent self. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
50. Kincheloe, J. L. (1993). Toward a critical politics of teacher thinking. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
51. LePoire, B. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: Expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory. Human Communication Research, 20, 560-591.
52. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., & Barraclough, R. A. (1995). A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44, 281-291.
53. McGee, J. C., & Eaker, R. (1977). Clinical Supervision and teacher anxiety: A collegial approach to the problem. Contemporary Education, 49, 24-28.
54. Mehrabian, A. (1967). Attitudes inferred from nonimmediacy of verbal communication. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 294-295.
55. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods and Instruments, 1, 213-217.
56. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent Messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
57. Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (1995, November). The roles of empathy, credibility, and sex in out of class communication between faculty and students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
58. Nussbaum, J. (1984). Classroom behavior of the effective teacher. Communication, 13, 81-91.
59. Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41, 167-180.
60. Nussbaum, J. F., Comadena, M. E., & Holladay, S. J. (1987). Classroom verbal behavior of highly effective teachers. Journal of Thought, 22, (4), 73-80.
61. Pajak, E. (1993). Approaches to clinical supervision: Alternatives for improving instruction. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gorden Publishers.
62. Pajak, E., & Glickman, C. D. (1989). Informational and controlling language in simulated supervisory conferences. American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
63. Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag. [Chapter 5 on "Intimacy"].
64. Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.
65. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10, (pp. 574-590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
66. Sallinen-Kuparinen, A. (1992). Teacher communicator style. Communication Education, 41, 153-166.
67. Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341-353.
68. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
69. Schwarte, B., Tesser, A., & Powell, E. (1982). Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 114-120.
70. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral authority and the regeneration of supervision. Supervision in transition. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
71. Smyth, J. (1997). Is supervision more than the surveillance of instruction? In J. Glanz & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 286-295). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
72. Snavely, W. B. (1981). The impact of social style upon person perception in primary relationships. Communication Quarterly, 29, 132-143.
73. Spiegal, J. P., & Machotka, P. (1974). Messages of the body. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan.
74. Spitzberg, B. H. (1983). Communication competence as knowledge, skill, and impression. Communication Education, 32, 323-329.
75. Spitzberg, B. H. (1991). An examination of trait measures of interpersonal competence. Communication Reports, 4(1), 22-29.
76. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
77. Sprague, J. (1992). Critical perspectives on teacher empowerment. Communication Education, 41, 181-203.
78. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
79. Thweatt, K. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 47, 348-358.
80. Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3, 250-257.
81. Wheeless, L. R. (1978). A follow-up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4, 143-157.
82. Wiemann, J. M. (1977). Explication and test of a model of communicative competence. Human Communication Research, 3, 195-213.
83. Wiemann, J. M., & Backlund, P. (1980). Current theory and research in communicative competence. Review of Educational Research, 50, 185-199.
84. Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 23-48.