Modeling structures of intelligence

Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 241-264

  Schulze, Ralf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745227701     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452233529.n14     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Bachelor, P. A. (1989). Maximum likelihood confirmatory factor-analytic investigation of factors within Guilford’s structure of intellect model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 797-804.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.797
2. Beauducel, A., & Kersting, M. (2002). Fluid and crystallized intelligence and the Berlin Model of Intelligence Structure (BIS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 97-112.doi:10.1027//1015-5759.18.2.97 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.2.97
3. Bekker, P. A., Merckens, A., & Wansbeek, T. J. (1994). Identification, equivalent models, and computer algebra. New York: Academic Press.
4. Bickley, P. G., Keith, T. Z., & Wolfe, L. M. (1995). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities: Test of the structure of intelligence across the life span. Intelligence, 20, 309-328.doi:10.1016/0160-2896(95)90013-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896%2895%2990013-6
5. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
6. Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605-634.doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239
7. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203-219.doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
8. Brody, N. (2000). History of theories and measurements of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 16-33). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111-150.doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05
10. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Tateneni, K., & Mels, G. (1998). CEFA: Comprehensive exploratory factor analysis. Retrieved November, 22, 2003, from http://quantrm2.psy.ohio-state.edu/browne/
11. Bucik, V., & Neubauer, A. C. (1996). Bimodality in the Berlin Model of Intelligence Structure (BIS): A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 987-1005.doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00129-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869%2896%2900129-8
12. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511571312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571312
13. Carroll, J. B. (1995). On the methodology in the study of cognitive abilities. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 429-452.doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3003_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3003_6
14. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15. Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115-127.doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1801_7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1801_7
16. Coenders, G., & Saris, W. E. (2000). Testing nested additive, multiplicative, and general multitrait-multimethod models. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 219-250.doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_5
17. Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Arvey, R., & Salas, E. (1993). Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 174-184.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.174
18. Cudeck, R. (2000). Exploratory factor analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 265-296). San Diego: Academic Press.
19. Davidson, J. E., & Downing, C. L. (2000). Contemporary models of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 34-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Dolan, C. V. (2000). Investigating Spearman’s hypothesis by means of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 21-50.doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_2
21. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W., & Trierweiler, L. I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38-60.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.38 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.38
22. Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309-331.doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309
23. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 3, 272-299.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
24. Flynn, J. R. (1998). IQ gains over time: Toward finding the causes. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures (pp. 25-66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Guilford, J. P. (1985). The structure-of-intellect model. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 225-266). New York: John Wiley.
27. Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the structure-of-intellect model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1-4.doi:10.1177/001316448804800102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316448804800102
28. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Balke, G. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 407-434.doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2804_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2804_2
29. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1992). Stability and change in broad and narrow factors of intelligence from ages 12 to 15 years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 141-149.doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.2.141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.2.141
30. Hancock, G. R., Lawrence, F. R., & Nevitt, J. (2000). Type I error and power of latent mean methods and MANOVA in factorially invariant and noninvariant latent variable systems. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 534-556.doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_2
31. Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Horn, J. L. (1988). Thinking about human abilities. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 645-685). New York: Plenum.
33. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144.doi:10.1080/03610739208253916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610739208253916
34. Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive abilities: Gf-Gc theory. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53-91). New York: Guilford.
35. Howe, M. J. A. (1996). Concepts of ability. In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 39-48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Humphreys, L. G. (1962). The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 17, 475-483.doi:10.1037/h0041550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0041550
37. Humphreys, L. G. (1985). General intelligence: Integration of factor, test, and simplex theory. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 201-224). New York: John Wiley.
38. Jäger, A. O. (1982). Mehrmodale Klassifikation von Intelligenzleistungen. Experimentell kontrollierte Weiterentwicklung eines deskriptiven Intelligenzstrukturmodells [Multimodal classification of intelligence performance: Experimentally controlled development of a descriptive intelligence structure model]. Diagnostica, 28, 195-225.
39. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
40. Keith, T. Z. (1997). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373-402). New York: Guilford.
41. Kyllonen, P. C. (1994). CAM: A theoretical framework for cognitive abilities measurement. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence: Vol. 4. Theories of intelligence (pp. 307-359). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192-211.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.192
43. Lubke, G. H., Dolan, C. V., & Kelderman, H. (2001). Investigating group differences on cognitive tests using Spearman’s hypothesis: An evaluation of Jensen’s method. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 299-324.doi:10.1207/S15327906299-324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327906299-324
44. Lubke, G. H., Dolan, C. V., Kelderman, H., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2003). On the relationship between sources of within- and between-group differences and measurement invariance in the common factor model. Intelligence, 31, 543-566.doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(03)00051-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896%2803%2900051-5
45. MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185
46. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.doi:10.1007/BF02294825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
47. Meredith, W., & Horn, J. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 203-240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48. Messick, S. (1992). Multiple intelligences or multilevel intelligence? Selective emphasis on distinctive properties of hierarchy: On Gardner’s Frames of Mind and Sternberg’s Beyond IQ in the context of theory and research on the structure of human abilities. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 365-384.doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0304_20
49. Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
50. Mulaik, S. A. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 259-288). New York: Plenum.
51. Mulaik, S. A., & Quartetti, D. A. (1997). First order or higher order general factor? Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 193-211.doi:10.1080/10705519709540071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519709540071
52. Muthen, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81-117.doi:10.2333/bhmk.29.81 http://dx.doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.29.81
53. Muthen, B. O., & Curran, P. J. (1997). General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2, 371-402.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.371
54. Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43.doi:10.1207/S15328031US0201_02 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02
55. Raykov, T. (2001). Testing multivariable covariance structure and means hypotheses via structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 224-256.doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_4
56. Raykov, T., & Penev, S. (1998). Nested structural equation models: Noncentrality and power of restriction test. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 229-246.doi:10.1080/10705519809540103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519809540103
57. Raykov, T., & Penev, S. (1999). On structural equation model equivalence. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 199-244.doi:10.1207/S15327906Mb340204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327906Mb340204
58. Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 369-379.doi:10.1080/10705519609540052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540052
59. Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51-67.doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_3
60. Roberts, R. D., Goff, G. N., Anjoul, F., Kyllonen, P. C., Pallier, G., & Stankov, L. (2000). The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB): Little more than acculturated learning (Gc)!? Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 81-103.doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(00)00035-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080%2800%2900035-2
61. Russell, D. W., Kahn, J. H., Spoth, R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 18-29.doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.1.18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.1.18
62. Sayer, A. G., & Cumsville, P. E. (2001). Second-order latent growth models. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 179-200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.doi:10.1037/10409-000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10409-000
63. Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53-61.doi:10.1007/BF02289209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289209
64. Skrondal, A., & Laake, P. (2001). Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika, 66, 563-576.doi:10.1007/BF02296196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02296196
65. Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229-239.
66. Spearman, C. (1904). "General intelligence," objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-292.doi:10.2307/1412107 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1412107
67. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York: Macmillan.
68. Steiger, J. H., & Fouladi, R. T. (1997). Noncentrality interval estimation and the evaluation of statistical models. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 221-257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69. Steiger, J. H., Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. W. (1985). On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50, 253-264.doi:10.1007/BF02294104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294104
70. Sternberg, R. J., Lautrey, J., & Lubart, T. I. (Eds.) (2003). Models of intelligence: International perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
71. Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability-and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261-288.
72. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple-factor analysis: A development and expansion of The Vectors of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74. Undheim, J. O., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (1987). The hierarchical organization of cognitive abilities: Restoring general intelligence through the use of linear structural relations (LISREL). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 149-171.doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2202_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2202_2
75. Vernon, P. E. (1961). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.
76. Vernon, P. E. (1973). Comment on Messick’s paper. In J. R. Royce (Ed.), Multivariate analysis and psychological theory (pp. 293-296). New York: Academic Press.
77. Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., Hessen, D. J., Oosterveld, P., van Baal, G. C. M., Boomsma, D. I., et al.(in press). Are intelligence tests measurement invariant over time? Investigating the nature of the Flynn effect. Intelligence.
78. Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). The relation of speeded and unspeeded reasoning with mental speed. Intelligence, 30, 537-554.doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00086-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896%2802%2900086-7
79. Yung, Y.-F., Thissen, D., & McLeod, L. D. (1999). On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model. Psycho-metrika, 64, 113-128.