Type I error and power of latent mean methods and MANOVA in factorially invariant and noninvariant latent variable systems

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 534-556

  Hancock, Gregory R ^a   Lawrence, Frank R ^b   Nevitt, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

LATENT VARIABLE; LOADING PATTERNS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHODS; MULTIPLE INDICATORS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCES; POPULATION ANALYSIS; TYPE I ERROR RATE; TYPE-I ERROR;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 0041497541     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Algina, J., & Oshima, T. C. (1990). Robustness of the independent samples Hotelling's T2 to variance- covariance heteroscedasticity when sample sizes are unequal and in small ratios. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 308-313.
2. Aptech Systems. (1996). GAUSS system and graphics manual. Maple Valley, WA: Author.
3. Bavry, J. L. (1993). STAT-POWER 2.2. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
4. Bentler, P. M. (1998). EQS structural equations program. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
5. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78-117.
6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
7. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305-314.
8. Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
9. Buse, A. (1982). The likelihood ratio, Wald, and Lagrange multiplier tests: An expository note. The American Statistician, 36, 153-157.
10. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, M., Marchi, M., & Velez, C. N. (1990). Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 183-196.
14. Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Arvey, R., & Salas, E. (1993). Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 174-184.
15. Hakstian, A. R., Roed, J. C., & Linn, J. C. (1979). Two-sample T2 procedure and the assumption of homogeneous covariance matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1255-1263.
16. Holloway, L. N., & Dunn, O. J. (1967). The robustness of Hotelling's T2. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 124-136.
17. Hopkins, J. W., & Clay, P. P. F. (1963). Some empirical distributions of bivariate T2 and homoscedasticity criterion M under unequal variance and leptokurtosis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 1048-1053.
18. Jöreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 631-639.
19. Kaplan, D., & George, R. (1995). A study of the power associated with testing factor mean differences under violations of factorial invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 101-118.
20. Lawrence, F. R., & Hancock, G. R. (1998, April). Finite sample behavior of the likelihood ratio, Wald, and Lagrange Multiplier tests: Bias and variability in univariate noncentrality parameter estimation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
21. Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54, 557-585.
22. Olson, C. L. (1974). Comparative robustness of six tests in multivariate analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 894-908.
23. Saris, W. E., & Satorra, A. (1993). Power evaluations in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 181-204). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Satorra, A. (1989). Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach. Psychometrika, 54, 131-151.
25. Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1983). The accuracy of a procedure for calculating the power of the likelihood ratio test as used within the LISREL framework. In C. P. Middendorp, B. Niemoller, & W. E. Saris (Eds.), Sociometric research 1982 (pp. 127-190). Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.
26. Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1985). Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 50, 83-90.
27. Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229-239.