Obesity - The new frontier of public health law

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 354, Issue 24, 2006, Pages 2601-2610

  Mello, Michelle M ^a   Studdert, David M ^a   Brennan, Troyen A ^b  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b AETNA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIGARETTE SMOKING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; LAW; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MOTOR VEHICLE; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; OBESITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; WORKPLACE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ADVERTISING; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD LABELING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; OBESITY; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC OPINION; STATE GOVERNMENT; TELEVISION; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 33745098119     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhpr060227     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Gostin LO. Public health law: power, duty, restraint. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
2. Mensah GA, Goodman RA, Zaza S, et al. Law as a tool for preventing chronic diseases: expanding the spectrum of effective public health strategies. Prev Chronic Dis 2004;1:A11.
3. Ten great public health achievements - United States, 1900-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999;48:241-3.
4. Koplan JP, Liverman CT, Kraak VI, eds. Preventing childhood obesity: health in the balance. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.
5. Nestle M, Jacobson MF. Halting the obesity epidemic: a public health policy approach. Public Health Rep 2000;115:12-24.
6. Mello MM, Rimm EB, Studdert DM. The McLawsuit: the fastfood industry and legal accountability for obesity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22(6):207-16.
7. New class action suits to target soda companies, advocates say. Obesity Policy Report. Vol. 3. No. 11. November 1, 2005.
8. Calories count: report of the working group on obesity. Rockville, Md.: Food and Drug Administration, March 12, 2004. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/owg-toc.html.)
9. Global strategy on diet, physical activity, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
10. The Center for Consumer Freedom. Fit or fat, we're under fire. August 25, 2002. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.consumerfreedom.com/ headline_detail.cfm?HEADLINE_ID=1398.)
11. Kersh R, Morone J. The politics of obesity: seven steps to government action. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(6):142-53.
12. Sturm R. The effects of obesity, smoking, and drinking on medical problems and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(2):245-53.
13. HHS announces revised Medicare obesity coverage policy. News releases of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Washington, D.C., July 15, 2004. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://hhs.gov/news/press/2004pres/20040715.html.)
14. Kunkel D. Children and television advertising. In: Singer DG, Singer JL, eds. Handbook of children and the media. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2001:375-93.
15. Kunkel D, Wilcox BL, Cantor J, Palmer E, Linn S, Dowrick P. Report of the APA Task Force on Advertising and Children. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, February 20, 2004. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.apa.org/releases/childrenads.pdf.)
16. McGinnis JM, Gootman JA, Kraak VI, eds. Food marketing to children and youth: threat or opportunity? Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2006.
17. Chou S-Y, Rashad I, Grossman M. Fast-food restaurant advertising and its influence on childhood obesity. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 2005. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=875730.)
18. Taras HL, Sallis JF, Patterson TL, Nader PR, Nelson JA. Television's influence on children's diet and physical activity. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1989;10:176-80.
19. Borzekowski DL, Robinson TN. The 30-second effect: an experiment revealing the impact of television commercials on food preferences of preschoolers. J Am Diet Assoc 2001;101:42-6.
20. Gorn GG, Goldberg ME. Behavioral evidence of the effects of televised food messages on children. J Consum Res 1982;9:200-5.
21. Story M, French S. Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in the US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2004;1:3.
22. The Surgeon General's call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity. Rockville, Md.: Office of the Surgeon General, 2001. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity/calltoaction/ CalltoAction.pdf.)
23. Schlosser E. Fast food nation: the dark side of the all-American meal. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001.
24. Nestle M. Food politics: how the food industry influences nutrition and health. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
25. Critser G. Fat land: how Americans became the fattest people in the world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003.
26. Westbrook C. Review of: Super Size Me. BBC News Online. September 10, 2004.
27. Obesity as a public health issue: a look at solutions. Washington, D.C.: Lake Snell Perry, June 11, 2003. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.phsi. harvard.edu/health_reform/poll_results.pdf.)
28. Harris Interactive. Most of the American public, including a majority of parents, believe that childhood obesity in the U.S. is a major problem. Wall Street Journal Online. February 15, 2005:1-4. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/wsjhealthnews/ WSJOnline_HI_Health-CarePoll2005vol4_iss03.pdf.)
29. Oliver JE, Lee T. Public opinion and the politics of America's obesity epidemic. KSG working paper no. RWP02-017. Cambridge, Mass.: John F. Kennedy School of Government, May 2002.
30. Evans WD, Finkelstein EA, Kamerow DB, Renaud JM. Public perceptions of childhood obesity. Am J Prev Med 2005;28:26-32.
31. Pelman ex rel. v. McDonald's Corp., 237 F. Supp. 2d 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2003), refiled as 2003 WL 22052778 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 3, 2003), vacated in part, 396 F.3d 508 (2d Cir. 2005), remanded, 396 F. Supp. 2d 439 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
32. Warner M. Lines are drawn for big suit over sodas. New York Times. December 7, 2005.
33. Epstein RA. What (not) to do about obesity: a moderate Aristotelian answer. Georgetown Law J 2005;93:1361-86.
34. State bill tracking: nutrition & healthy lifestyles. Washington, D.C.: National Restaurant Association, 2005. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.restaurant.org/government/state/nutrition/bills_key.cfm#lawsuits.)
35. Ebbeling CB, Pawlak DB, Ludwig DS. Childhood obesity: public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet 2002;360:473-82.
36. Fried EJ, Nestle M. The growing political movement against soft drinks in schools. JAMA 2002;288:2181.
37. American Beverage Association. School beverage guidelines Q&A. 2006. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.ameribev.org/schools/GuidelineQandA.asp.)
38. Carter RC. The impact of public schools on childhood obesity. JAMA 2002;288:2180.
39. Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance Survey: youth online comprehensive results. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004.
40. National Conference of State Legislatures. Health Promotion Program state legislation and statute database: obesity, obesity-childhood, physical activity, and nutrition. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.ncsl.org/ programs/health/phdatabase.htm.)
41. Nutrition standards for foods in schools. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine, 2005. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.iom.edu/project.asp?id= 30181.)
42. Jacobson MF, Brownell KD. Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health. Am J Public Health 2000;90:854-7.
43. French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW. Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annu Rev Public Health 2001;22:309-35.
44. Reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Surgeon General, August 2000. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/sgr_2000/index.htm.)
45. DeCicca P, Kenkel D, Mathios A. Putting out the fires: will higher taxes reduce the onset of youth smoking? J Polit Econ 2002;110:144-69.
46. Ross H, Chaloupka FJ. The effect of cigarette prices on youth smoking. Health Econ 2003;12:217-30.
47. Hawkes C. Marketing food to children: the global regulatory environment. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241591579.pdf.)
48. Commercial activities in schools. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office, September 2000. (Report no. GAO/HEHS-00-156.) (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/he00156.pdf.)
49. Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration. Working agreement between FTC and Food and Drug Administration. 4 Trade Reg. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 9,850.01 (1971).
50. Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 (1914).
51. Federal Trade Commission. Children's advertising: proposed trade regulation rulemaking and public hearing, Fed Regist 1978;43(82):17967-72.
52. Westen T. Historical perspective on FTC rulemaking and why it failed. Presented at Loyola Law School Symposium on Food Marketing to Children and the Law, Los Angeles, October 21, 2005.
53. Federal Trade Commission. Children's advertising: termination of rulemaking proceeding. Fed Regist 1981;46(191):48710-4.
54. Engle PC. The FTC as national nanny. Washington Post. March 8, 1978:A14.
55. Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980, P.L. 96-252, 94 Stat. 374 (1980).
56. Harrison K. Is "fat free" good for me? A panel study of television viewing and children's nutritional knowledge and reasoning. Health Commun 2005;17:117-32.
57. Signorielli N, Staples J. Television and children's conceptions of nutrition. Health Commun 1997;9:289-301.
58. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Grasso D. Health, medicine, and food messages in television commercials during 1992 and 1998. J Sch Health 2000;70:61-5.
59. Children's Television Act of 1990, 47 U.S.C. §§ 303(a)-(b), 394 (1990).
60. Federal Trade Commission, Department of Health and Human Services, Perspectives on marketing, self-regulation, and childhood obesity. Washington, D.C.: Federal Trade Commission, April 2006. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2006/05/ PerspectivesOnMarketingSelfRegulation%26Childhood ObesityFTCandHHSReportonJointWorkshop.pdf.)
61. Federal Trade Commission. In the matter of request for comment on First Amendment issues. Report no. 02N-0209. September 13, 2002. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2002/09/fdatextversion.pdf.)
62. Virginia Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 738 (1976).
63. Carey v. Population Services, International, 431 U.S. 678 (1977).
64. Gostin LO. Corporate speech and the Constitution: the deregulation of tobacco advertising. Am J Public Health 2002;92:352-5.
65. Bayer R, Gostin LO, Javitt GH, Brandt A. Tobacco advertising in the United States: a proposal for a constitutionally acceptable form of regulation. JAMA 2002;287:2990-5.
66. 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996).
67. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001).
68. Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 358 F3d 1228 (10th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 125 S.Ct. 47 (Oct. 4, 2004).
69. Engle MK. FTC regulation of marketing to children. Presented at the Institute of Medicine workshop on the prevention of childhood obesity: understanding the influences of marketing, media, and family dynamics. Washington, D.C., December 9, 2003. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.iom.edu/?id=17215.)
70. Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 321(n), 343(a) (1994).
71. Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, 21 U.S.C. §§ 343(q)-(r) (1990).
72. Food and Drug Administration. Food labeling, health messages and label statements: reproposed rule. Fed Regist 1990;55(30):5176-92.
73. Mathios AD. The impact of mandatory disclosure laws on product choices: an analysis of the salad dressing market. J Law Econ 2000;43:651-77.
74. Noah L, Noah BA. Liberating commercial speech: product labeling controls and the First Amendment. Fla Law Rev 1995;47:63-112.
75. Food and Drug Administration, Food labeling: trans fatty acids in nutrition labeling, nutrient content claims, and health claims, 21 C.F.R. § 101.9 (2003).
76. Tarantino LM. Letter to food manufacturers about accurate serving size declaration on food products. Rockville, Md.: Food and Drug Administration, March 2004. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/fl-ltr4. html.)
77. FDA asking for public comment on food label changes. Washington, D.C.: Food and Drug Administration, 2005. (Accessed May 25, 2006, at http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2005/NEW01170.html.)
78. McCann MA. Economic efficiency and consumer choice theory in nutritional labeling. Wisconsin Law Rev 2004;4:1161-244.
79. Gostin LO, Javitt GH. Health promotion and the First Amendment: government control of the informational environment. Milbank Q 2001;79:547-78.
80. United States v. United Foods, Inc., 533 U.S. § 405 (2001).
81. Thompson v. Western States Medical Center, 535 U.S. § 357 (2002).
82. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" anti-smoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 2005;95:425-31.
83. Emery S, Wakefield MA, Terry-McElrath Y, et al. Televised state-sponsored antitobacco advertising and youth smoking beliefs and behavior in the United States, 1999-2000. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:639-45.
84. Tillotson JE. America's obesity: conflicting public policies, industrial economic development, and unintended human consequences. Annu Rev Nutr 2004;24:617-43.
85. Bloche MG. Obesity and the struggle within ourselves. Georgetown Law J 2005;93:1335-59.