A tabular approach to the sequence-to-structure relation in proteins (tetrapeptide representation) for de novo protein design

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2006, Pages

  Meus, Jan ^a   Brylinski, Michał ^a,b   Piwowar, Monika ^a   Piwowar, Piotr ^c   Wiśniowski, Zdzisław ^a   Stefaniak, Justyna ^b   Konieczny, Leszek ^a   Surówka, Grzegorz ^b   Roterman, Irena ^a,b  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^c AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

coefficient; Contingency table; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

POLYPEPTIDE; TETRAPEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTINGENCY TABLE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 33744953613     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: 16433750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Chou PY, Fasman GD: Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, Beta-sheet and random coil region calculated from proteins. Biochemistry, 1974a; 13: 211-22
2. Chou PY, Fasman GD: Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry, 1974b;13: 222-45
3. Chou PY: Prediction of protein structural classes from amino acid composition. In: Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation, ed G.D. New York: Fasman Plenum Press, 1989; 549-86
4. Fasman GD: The development of the prediction of protein structure. In: Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation, ed G.D. New York: Fasman Plenum Press, 1989; 193-316
5. Garnier J, Robson B: The GOR method for predicting secondary structures in proteins. In: Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation, ed. G.D. New York: Fasman Plenum Press, 1989; 417-65
6. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z et al: The Protein Data Bank (2003# release). Nucleic Acids Res, 2000; 28: 235-42
7. Kinch LN, Qi Y, Hubbard TJP, Grishin NV: CASP5 target classification. Proteins, 2003; 53(Suppl.6): 340-51
8. Kosinski J, Cymerman IA, Feder M et al: A "Frankenstein's monster" approach to comparative modeling: merging the finest fragments of fold-recognition models and iterative model refinement aided by 3D structure evaluation. Proteins, 2003; 53: 369-79
9. Venclovas Č: Comparative modeling in CASP5: Progress is evident, but alignment errors remain a significant hindrance. Proteins, 2003; 53(Suppl.6): 380-88
10. Sasson I, Fischer D: Modeling three-dimensional protein structures for CASP5 using the 3-D-shotgun meta-predictors. Proteins, 2003; 53: 389-94
11. Kinch LN, Wrabl JO, Krishna SS et al: CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins, 2003; 53(Suppl.6): 395-409
12. Ginalski K, Rychlewski L: Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment. Proteins, 2003; 53(Suppl.6): 410-17
13. von Grotthus M, Pas J, Wyrwicz L et al: Application of 3D-Jury GRDB and Verify3D in fold recognition. Proteins, 2003; 53(Suppl.6): 418-23
14. Liu W, Chou KC: Prediction of protein secondary structure content. Prot Engineer, 1999; 12: 1041-50
15. Zhou X, Alber F, Folkers G et al: An analysis of the helix-to-strand transition between peptides with identical sequence. Proteins Struct Func Genet, 2000; 41: 248-56
16. Prakash T, Ramakrishnan C, Dash D, Brahmachari SK: Conformational analysis of invariant peptide sequences in bacterial genomes. J Mol Biol, 2005; 345: 937-55
17. Baldwin RL: Making a network of hydrophobic clusters. Science, 2002; 295: 1657-58
18. Jurkowski W, Brylinski M, Konieczny L et al: Conformational Subspace in Simulation of Early-Stage Protein Folding. Proteins Struct, Funct. and Bioinf, 2004; 55: 115-27
19. Roterman I: Modeling of optimal simulation path in the peptide chain folding - Studies based on geometry of alanine heptapeptide. J Theor Biol, 1995; 177: 283-88
20. Kendall MG, Stuart A: The Advanced Theory of Statistics. vol. 2 New York, Hafner, 1961
21. th ed. London, Griffin, 1979
22. Clayton D: Population association. In: Handbook of Statistical Genetics, ed. Balding DJ, Bishop M, Cannings C, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., London, 2001; 519-40
23. Ewens WJ, Spielman RS: The transmission/disequilibrium test. In: Handbook of Statistical Genetics, ed. Balding DJ, Bishop M, Cannings C, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., London, 2001; 507-18
24. Holaman P: Nonparametric linkage. In: Handbook of Statistical Genetics, ed. Balding DJ, Bishop M, Cannings C, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., London, 2001; 487-506
25. Elston R, Olson J, Palmer L: Biostatistical genetics and genetic epidemiology. John Wiley & Sons. Ltd., London, 2002; 29-33
26. Roterman I: The geometrical analysis of polypeptide backbone structure and its deformation. Biochimie, 1995; 77: 204-16
27. Aczel AD: Complete Business Statistics. Boston, New York, San Francisco, St Louis, Bangkok, Bogota, Caracas, Lisbon, London, Madrid, Mexico City, Milan, New Delhi, Seoul, Singapore, Sydney, Taipei, Toronto, McGraw-Hill I, 1996; 460
28. Nemethy G, Gibson KD, Palmer KA et al: Energy Parameters in Polypeptides. 10. Improved geometric parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides. J Phys Chem, 1992; 96: 6472-84
29. Sippl MJ, Nemethy G, Scheraga HA: Intermolecular Potentials for Crystal Data 6. Determination of Empirical Potentials for 0-H-O=C Hydrogen Bonds for Packing Configurations. J Phys Chem, 1984; 88: 6231-33
30. Crasto CJ, Feng J: Sequence codes for extended conformation. A neighbour dependent sequence analysis of loops in proteins Proteins. Struct Func Gen, 2001; 42: 399-413
31. Prakash T, Ramakrishnan C, Dash D, Brahmachari SK: Conformational analysis of invariant peptide sequences in bacterial genomes. J Mol Biol, 2005; 345: 937-55
32. Moult J, Hubbard T, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT: Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round III. Proteins Struct Func Gen, 1999; Suppl.3: 2-6
33. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T: Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IV. Proteins Struct Func Gen 2001; Suppl.5: 2-7
34. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T: Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round V. Proteins Struct Func Gen, 2003; 53: 334-39
35. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J: Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round V. Proteins Struct Func Gen. 2003; 53: 585-95
36. Brylinski M, Jurkowski W, Konieczny L, Roterman I: Limited conformational space for early stage protein folding simulation. Bioinformatics, 2004; 20: 199-205
37. Jurkowski W, Brylinski M, Konieczny L, Roterman I: Lysozyme folded in silico according to the limited conformational sub-space. J Biomol Struct Dynam, 2004; 22: 149-58
38. Brylinski M, Jurkowski W, Konieczny L, Roterman I: Limitation of conformational space for proteins - early stage folding simulation of human α and β hemoglobin chains. TASK Quarterly, 2004; 8: 413-22
39. Fischer N, Riechmann L, Winter G A: Native-like artificial protein from antisense. DNA PEDS, 2004; 17: 13-20
40. Brylinski M, Konieczny L, Roterman I: SPI - Structure predictability index for protein sequences. In Silico Biology, 2004; 5: 0022 (internet publication)
41. Brylinski M, Jurkowski W, Czerwonko P et al: Early-stage folding in proteins - structure to sequence relation. J Biomed Biotech, 2005; 2; 65-79
42. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D: Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004; 1(32): W526-31
43. Chivian D, Kim DE, Malmstrom L et al: Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server. Proteins, 2003; 53(Suppl.6): 524-33
44. Tlistone C, Aldhous P: Vital Statistics. Nature, 2003; 424: 610-12