Protein Structure Prediction of CASP5 Comparative Modelling and Fold Recognition Targets Using Consensus Alignment Approach and 3D Assessment

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 53, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2003, Pages 410-417

  Ginalski, Krzysztof ^a   Rychlewski, Leszek ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b BIOINFOBANK INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

3D evaluation; 3D Jury; Comparative modeling; Consensus alignment approach; Fold recognition; Meta Server; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 0242267511     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10548     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93-96.
2. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IV. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:2-7.
3. Fischer D, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Pazos F, Valencia A, Rost B, Ortiz AR, Dunbrack RL, Jr. CAFASP2: the second critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:171-183.
4. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1015-1018.
5. Bujnicki JM, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. Structure prediction meta server. Bioinformatics 2001;17:750-751.
6. Ginalski K, Pas J, Wyrwicz LS, von Grotthuss M, Bujnicki JM, Rychlewski L. ORFeus: Detection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3804-3807.
7. Karplus K, Karchin R, Barrett C, Tu S, Cline M, Diekhans M, Grate L, Casper J, Hughey R. What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction? Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:86-91.
8. Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 2000;9:232-241.
9. Jones DT. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999;287:797-815.
10. Fischer D. Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information. Pac Symp Biocomput 2000;5:116-127.
11. Xu J, Li M, Lin G, Kim D, Xu Y. Protein threading by linear programming. Pac Symp Biocomput 2003;8:264-275.
12. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment- specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001;310:243-257.
13. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D- PSSM. J Mol Biol 2000;299:499-520.
14. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
15. Holm L, Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 1996;273:595-603.
16. Lo Conte L, Ailey B, Hubbard TJ, Brenner SE, Murzin AG, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:257-259.
17. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4680.
18. Venclovas C, Ginalski K, Fidelis K. Addressing the issue of sequence-to-structure alignments in comparative modeling of CASP3 target proteins. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:73-80.
19. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
20. Luthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 1992;356:83-85.
21. Sippl MJ. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 1993;17:355-362.
22. Bower MJ, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J Mol Biol 1997;267:1268-1282.
23. Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Singh UC, Ghio C, Alagona G, Profeta SJr, Weiner P. A new forcefield for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1984;106:765-784.
24. Hooft RW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE. Errors in protein structures. Nature 1996;381:272.
25. Chothia C, Lesk AM. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J 1986;5:823-826.
26. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3-D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.