Polyphyly of the genus Actinodaphne (Lauraceae) inferred from the analyses of nrDNA ITS and ETS sequences

Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 272-285

  Li, Zhi Ming ^a,b   Li, Jie ^a   Li, Xi Wen ^a  

^a CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Actinodaphne; Bayesian analysis; ETS; ITS; Lauraceae; Phylogenetic analysis

Indexed keywords

ACTINODAPHNE; LAURACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 33744947342     PISSN: 05291526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1360/aps040150     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allen C K. 1938. Studies in the Lauraceae. 1: Chinese and Indo-Chinese species of Litsea, Neolitsea, and Actinodaphne. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 25: 361-433.
2. Baldwin B G, Sanderson M J, Proter J M, Wojciechowski M F, Camphbell C S, Donoghue M J. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
3. Baldwin B G, Markos S. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S-26S rDNA: Congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 449-463.
4. Barker N P, Linder H P, Morton C M, Lyle M. 2003. The paraphyly of Cortaderia (Danthonioideae; Poaceae): evidence from morphology and chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 1-24.
5. Barrett M, Donoghue M J, Sober E. 1991. Against consensus. Systematic Zoology 40: 486-493.
6. Bena G, Jubier M F, Olivieri I, Lejeune B. 1998. Ribosomal external and internal transcribed spacers: Combined use in phylogenetic analysis of Medicago (Leguminosae). Journal of Molecular Evolution 46: 299-306.
7. Buckler E S IV, Holtsford T P. 1996. Zea systematics: ribosomal ITS evidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 612-622.
8. Buckler E S IV, Ippolito A, Holtsford T P. 1997. The evolution for ribosomal DNA: divergent paralogues and phylogenetic implications. Genetics 145: 821-832.
9. Bull J J, Huelsenbeck J P, Cunningham C W, Swofford D L, Wadell P J. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 384-397.
10. Chanderbali A S, van der Werff H, Renner S S. 2001. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of Lauraceae: Evidence from the chloroplast and nuclear genomes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88: 104-134.
11. Chase M W, Cox A V, Soltis D E, Soltis P S, Moil M E, Savolainen V, Reeves G, Hoot S B, Morton C M. 1997. Large DNA sequence matrices, phylogenetic signal and feasibility: an empirical approach. American Journal of Botany (Supplement) 84: 181.
12. Cunningham C W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
13. de Queiroz A D, Donoghue M, Kim J. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 657-681.
14. Doyle J J, Doyle J S. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small qualities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
15. DNASTAR I. 1998. MegAlign3.18 eds. Madison, WI. U.S.A.: DNASTAR, Inc.
16. Elodenäs P, Linder H P. 2000. Congruence and complementarity of morphological and trnL-F sequence, and the phylogeny of the African Restionaceae. Systematic Botany 25: 692-707.
17. Farris J S, Källersjö M, Kluge A G, Bult C J. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
18. Farris J S, Källersjö M, Kluge A G, Bult C J. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44: 570-572.
19. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
20. Gao L-M, Li D-Z, Zhang C-Q. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of Rhododendron section Azaleastrum (Ericaceae) based on ITS sequences. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 41: 173-179.
21. Ge S, Schaal B A, Hong D-Y. 1997. A reevaluation of the status of A. lobophylla based on ITS sequence, with reference to the utility of ITS sequence in Adenophora. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 35: 385-395.
22. Good L, Intine R V A, Nazar R N. 1997. Interdependence in the processing of ribosomal RNAs in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Journal of Molecular Biology 273: 782-788.
23. Hall B G. 2001. Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy: A How-To Mannual for Molecular Biologists. Massachusetts, U.S.A.: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
24. Hall T A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nuclear Acids Symbol Series 41: 95-98.
25. Hills D M, Bull J J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
26. Hong Y-P, Chen Z-D, Lu A-M. 2001. Phylogeny of the tribe Menispermeae (Menispermaceae) reconstructed by ITS sequence data. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 39: 97-104.
27. Huelsenbeck J P, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
28. Kluge A G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
29. Kostermans A J G H. 1957. Lauraceae. Communication (Pengumuman) of the Forest Research Institute 57: 1-64.
30. Lanyon S M. 1993. Phylogenetic frameworks: towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 49: 45-61.
31. Li J, Christophel D C. 2000. Systematic relationships within the Litsea complex (Lauraceae): a cladistic analysis based on morphological and leaf cuticle data. Australian Systematic Botany 13: 1-13.
32. Li J, Christophel D C, Conran J Q Li H-W. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships within the 'core' Laureae (Litsea complex, Lauraceae) inferred from sequences of the chloroplast gene matK and nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS regions. Plant Systematics and Evolution 26: 19-36.
33. Mason-Gamer R J, Kellogg E A. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Biology 45: 524-545.
34. Miyamoto M M, Fitch W M. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Systematic Biology 44: 64-76.
35. Nees von Esenbeck F C G D. 1836. Systema Laurinarum. Berlin: Sumtibus Veitii et sociorum.
36. Posada D, Crandall K A. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
37. Roalson E H, Friar E A. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographic patterns in North American members of Carex section Acrocystis (Cyperaceae) using nrDNA ITS and ETS sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 243: 175-187.
38. Rohwer J G. 1993. Lauraceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer J G, Bittrich V eds. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 2: 366-391.
39. Rohwer J G. 2000. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Lauraceae: evidence from matK sequences. Systematic Botany 25: 60-70.
40. Soltis D E, Soltis P E. 1998. Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. In: Soltis D E, Soltis P E, Doyle J J eds. Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing. Boston: Kluwer Academic. 1-42.
41. Steane D A, Wilson K L, Hill R S. 2003. Using matK sequence data to unravel the phylogeny of Casurinaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 47-59.
42. Swofford D L. 1998. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
43. Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 101: 512-526.
44. Thompson J D, Gibson T J, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D G. 1997. The ClustalX-windows interface: Flexible Strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882.
45. Tsui H-P. 1987. A study on the system of Lindera. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 25: 161-171.
46. Van der Werff H. 1991. A key to the genera of Lauraceae in the New World. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 377-387.
47. Van der Werff H. 2001. An annotated key to the genera of Lauraceae in the Flora Malesiana region. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 46: 125-140.
48. Van der Werff H, Richter H G. 1996. Toward an improved classification of Lauraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 377-387.
49. White T J, Bruns T D, Lee S B, Taylor J W. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of ribosomal RNA genes and the internal transcribed spacer in fungi. In: Innis M A, Gelfand G H, Sninsky F J, White T J eds. PCR-Protocols and Applications - A Laboratory Manual. Orlando Fl.: Academic Press. 315-322.
50. Yang Y-C, Huang P-H. 1984. Actinodaphne Nees. In: Flora of Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing: Science Press. 31: 242-261.