Object-based attention and cognitive tunneling

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-12

  Jarmasz, Jerzy ^a,b   Herdman, Chris M ^a   Johannsdottir, Kamilla Run ^a,c  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AKUREYRI   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Cognitive tunneling; Focused attention; Head up displays; Object based attention; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 17444414951     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brickner, M. S. (1989). Apparent limitations of head-up displays and thermal imaging systems. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 703-707). Columbus: Ohio State University.
2. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor brakes down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448-456.
3. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
4. Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 583-597.
5. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
6. Fadden, S., Ververs, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). Pathway HUDs: Are they viable? Human Factors, 43, 173-193.
7. Fischer, E., Haines, R. F., & Price, T. A. (1980). Cognitive issues in head-up displays. (NASA Tech. Rep. No. 1711). Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center.
8. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
9. Foyle, D. C., Sanford, B., & McCann, R. S. (1991). Attentional issues in superimposed flight symbology. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 577-582). Columbus: Ohio State University.
10. Herdman, C. M., Johannsdottir, K. R., Armstrong, J., Jarmasz, J., LeFevre, J., & Lichacz, F. (2001). Mixed-up but flyable: HMDs with aircraft- and head-referenced symbology. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics: Aerospace and transportation systems (pp. 73-82). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
11. Jarmasz, J., Herdman, C. M., & Johannsdottir, K. R. (2001). Object layers in HUDs: The role of motion in grouping symbology. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics: Aerospace and transportation systems (pp. 65-72). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
12. Jonides, J. (1983). Further towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 96, 29-44.
13. Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in vision: Essays on Gestaltperctption. New York: Praeger.
14. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
15. LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371-379.
16. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
17. Lavie, N., & Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.
18. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
19. Mapelli, D., Cherubini, P., & Umilta, C. (2002). Attending to objects: Costs or benefits? Acta Psychologica, 109, 57-74.
20. Martin-Emerson, R., & Wickens, C. D. (1997). Superimposition, symbology, visual attention, and the head-up display. Human Factors, 39, 581-601.
21. McCann, R. S., & Foyle, D. C. (1995). Scene-linked symbology to improve situation awareness. AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 555. (pp. 16:1-16:11). Aerospace Medical Panel Conference on Situation Awareness, Brussels, Belgium.
22. McCann, R. S., Foyle, D. C., & Johnston, J. C. (1993). Attentional limitations with head-up displays. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 70-75. Columbus: Ohio State University.
23. McLeod, P., Driver, J., Dienes, Z., & Crisp, J. (1991). "Filtering by movement in visual search." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 55-64.
24. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
25. Stelmach, L. B., & Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539-550.
26. Stelmach, L. B., Herdman, C. M., & McNeil, K. R. (1994). Attentional modulation of visual processes in motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 108-121.
27. Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
28. Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., & Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight: Object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137-151.
29. Wickens, C. D., & Long, J. (1995). Object versus space-based models of visual attention: Implications for the design of head-up displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 179-193.