Symbolic- and response-related contributions to blindness to compatible stimuli

Visual Cognition

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 326-350

  Stevanovski, Biljana ^a   Oriet, Chris ^b   Jolicœur, Pierre ^c  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BLINDNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYMBOLISM; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33744930357     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280500296470     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Caessens, B. and Vandierendonck, A. (2002) Inhibition and blindness to response-compatible stimuli: A reappraisal Acta Psychologica, 111, pp. 45-57.
2. Eimer, M. (1999) Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural peformance Acta Psychologica, 101, pp. 293-313.
3. Eimer, M. and Schlaghecken, F. (1998) Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 1737-1747.
4. Hommel, B. and Müsseler, J. and Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. (2001) The theory of event coding: A framework for perception and action planning Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), pp. 849-937.
5. Kunde, W., & Wühr, P.(2003). Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 68, 199-207.
6. Müsseler, J. and Hommel, B. (1997a) Blindness to response-compatible stimuli Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, pp. 861-872.
7. Müsseler, J. and Hommel, B. (1997b) Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, pp. 125-129.
8. Müsseler, J. and Steininger, S. and Wühr, P. (2001) Can actions affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, pp. 137-154.
9. Müsseler, J. and Wühr, P and Prinz, W. (2000) Varying the response-code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli Visual Cognition, 7, pp. 743-767.
10. Oriet, C. and Stevanovski, B. and Jolicœur, P. and Cowan, W. B. (2003) Lengthening the duration of response execution does not modulate blindness to action compatible stimuli Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, pp. 11-22.
11. Prinz, W. (1992) Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, pp. 1-20.
12. Schneider, W. (1988) Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, pp. 206-217.
13. Stevanovski, B. and Oriet, C. and Jolicœur, P. (2002) Blinded by headlights Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, pp. 65-74.
14. Stevanovski, B. and Oriet, C. andd Jolicœur, P. (2003) Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 431-440.
15. Stoet, G. and Hommel, B. (1999) Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, pp. 1625-1640.
16. Stoet, G. and Hommel, B.(2002) Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action. (pp. 538-552). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Wühr, P. and Müsseler, J. (2001) Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, pp. 1260-1270.