Comparison of body weight and composition measured by two different dual energy X-ray absorptiometry devices and three acquisition modes in obese women

Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 428-437

  Genton, Laurence ^a   Karsegard, Véronique L ^a   Zawadynski, Sophie ^a   Kyle, Ursula G ^a   Pichard, Claude ^a   Golay, Alain ^a   Hans, Didier B ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Body composition; DXA; Inter device differences; Obesity; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEAN BODY WEIGHT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MORBID OBESITY; OBESITY; PHANTOM; ROENTGEN APPARATUS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33744902871     PISSN: 02615614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wang Z.M., Deurenberg P., Guo S.S., et al. Six-compartment body composition model: inter-method comparisons of total body fat measurement. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22 (1998) 329-337
2. Haderslev K.V., and Staun M. Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to four other methods to determine body composition in underweight patients with chronic gastrointestinal disease. Metabolism 49 (2000) 360-366
3. Tothill P., Avenell A., Love J., and Reid D.M. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr 48 (1994) 781-794
4. Genton L., Hans D., Kyle U.G., and Pichard C. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods. Nutrition 18 (2002) 66-70
5. Nakata Y., Tanaka K., Mizuki T., and Yoshida T. Body composition measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry differ between two analysis modes. J Clin Densitom 7 (2004) 443-447
6. Ellis K.J., and Shypailo R.J. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers. J Bone Miner Res 13 (1998) 1613-1618
7. Oldroyd B., Truscott J.G., Woodrow G., et al. Comparison of in-vivo body composition using two Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers. Eur J Clin Nutr 52 (1998) 180-185
8. Genton L., Hans D., Kyle U.G., Slosman D.O., and Pichard C. Half-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) predicts whole body composition (WBC) in obese patients. Clin Nutr 21 (2003) 22
9. Jebb S.A., Goldberg G.R., Jennings G., and Elia M. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition: effects of depth and tissue thickness, including comparisons with direct analysis. Clin Sci (Lond) 88 (1995) 319-324
10. Economos C.D., Nelson M.E., Fiatarone Singh M.A., et al. Bone mineral measurements: a comparison of delayed gamma neutron activation, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and direct chemical analysis. Osteoporos Int 10 (1999) 200-206
11. Sutter B., Legrand O., Meys E., Bougon F., and Hardouin P. Accuracy in weight mesurement with Hologic QDR 4500 Acclaim. Bone 28 (2001) S173
12. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
13. Njeh C.F., and Hans D. Instrument evaluation. In: Njeh C.F., and Langton C.M. (Eds). The physical measurement of bone (2004), Institute of Physics Publishing, London 91-121
14. Laskey M.A., Flaxman M.E., Barber R.W., et al. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers. Br J Radiol 64 (1991) 1023-1029
15. Pritchard J.E., Nowson C.A., and Strauss B.J. Evaluation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as a method of measurement of body fat. Eur J Clin Nutr 47 (1993) 216-228
16. Modlesky C.M., Lewis R.D., Yetman K.A., et al. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men. Am J Clin Nutr 64 (1996) 669-676
17. Kistorp C.N., and Svendsen O.L. Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers. Eur J Clin Nutr 51 (1997) 449-454
18. Tylavsky F., Lohman T., Blunt B.A., et al. QDR 4500A DXA overestimates fat-free mass compared with criterion methods. J Appl Physiol 94 (2003) 959-965
19. Mazess R.B., and Barden H.S. Evaluation of differences between fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers. Calcif Tissue Int 67 (2000) 291-296
20. Goran M.I., Toth M.J., and Poehlman E.T. Assessment of research-based body composition techniques in healthy elderly men and women using the 4-compartment model as a criterion method. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22 (1998) 135-142
21. Kemink S.A., Frijns J.T., Hermus A.R., Pieters G.F., Smals A.G., and van Marken Lichtenbelt W.D. Body composition determined by six different methods in women bilaterally adrenalectomized for treatment of Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84 (1999) 3991-3999
22. Cordero-MacIntyre Z.R., Peters W., Libanati C.R., et al. Reproducibility of DXA in obese women. J Clin Densitom 5 (2002) 35-44