Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 449-454

  Kistorp, C N ^a   Svendsen, O L ^b  

^a CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND BASIC RESEARCH   (Denmark)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Body composition; Diabetes; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry

Indexed keywords

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BONE MINERAL; DIABETES MELLITUS; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEAN BODY WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OBESITY; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0030807244     PISSN: 09543007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600424     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abrahamsen B, Gram J, Hansen TB & Beck-Nielsen J (1995): Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements. Bone 16, 385-390.
2. Bland JM & Altman DG (1986): Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet II, 307-310.
3. Fuller NJ, Laskey MA & Ella M (1992): Assessment of the composition of major body regions by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), with special reference to limb muscle mass. Clin. Physiol. 12, 253-266.
4. Haarbo J, Gotfredsen A, Hassager C & Christiansen C (1991): Validation of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Clin. Physiol. 11, 331-341.
5. Jebb SA, Goldberg GR, Jennings G & Elia M (1995): Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition: effects of depth and tissue thickness, including comparisons with direct analysis. Clin. Sci. 88, 319-324.
6. Laskey MA, Flaxman ME, Barber RW, Trafford S, Hayball MP, Lyttle KD, Crisp AJ & Compston JE (1991): Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers. Br. J. Radiol. 64, 1023-1029.
7. Laskey MA, Lyttle KD, Flaxman ME & Barber RW (1992): The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 46, 39-45.
8. Lukaski HC (1993): Soft tissue composition and bone mineral status: evaluation by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J. Nutr. 123, 438-443.
9. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bidek JP & Hanson J (1990): Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for total body and regional bone mineral and soft tissue composition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 51, 1106-1112.
10. Mazess RB, Bisek J, Trempe J & Poutchot S (1991): Effects of tissue thickness on body composition measurements using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Madison WI: Lunar Corporation.
11. Pritchard JE, Nowson CA, Strauss BJ, Carlson JS & Kaymakci B (1992): Evaluation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as a method of measurement of body fat. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 47, 216-228.
12. SAS Institute Inc (1989): Guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. Gary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.
13. Spector E, LeBlanc A & Shackelford L (1995): Hologic QDR 2000 whole body scans: A comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software. Osteoporosis Int. 5, 440-445.
14. Svendsen OL, Haarbo J, Hassager C & Christiansen C (1993): Accuracy of measurement of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 605-608.
15. Tothill P, Avenell A, Love J & Reid DM (1994): Comparison between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole body soft tissue measurements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48, 781-794.
16. Van Loan MD, Keim NL, Berg K & Mayclin PL (1995): Evaluation of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 27, 587-591.