Instrument evaluation

The Physical Measurement of Bone

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 91-121

  Njeh, Christopher F ^a   Hans, Didier ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEASUREMENT;

EID: 33744908204     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Glüer C C, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt B A, Jergas M and Genant H K 1995 Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques Osteoporos. Inti. 5(4) 262-70
2. Ravn P, Overgaard K, Huang C, Ross P D, Green D and McClung M 1996 Comparison of bone densitometry of the phalanges, distal forearm and axial skeleton in early postmenopausal women participating in the EPIC Study Osteoporos. Inti. 6(4) 308-13
3. Blake G M and Fogelman I 1997 Technical principles of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Semin. Nucl. Med. 27(3) 210-28
4. Gluer C C 1999 Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques 1999 J. Bone Miner. Res. 14(11) 1952-62
5. Gluer C C 1997 How to characterize the ability of diagnostic technique to monitor skeletal changes J. Bone Miner. Res. 12 (Suppl 1) S378
6. Miller C G, Herd R J, Ramalingam T, Fogelman I and Blake G M 1993 Ultrasonic velocity measurements through the calcaneus: which velocity should be measured? Osteoporos. Intl. 3(1) 31-5
7. Lu Y and Glüer C C 1999 Statistical tools in quantitative ultrasound applications. In Quantitative Ultrasound: Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status eds C F Njeh, D Hans, T Fuerst, C C Glüer and H K Genant (London: Martin Dunitz) pp 77-100
8. Hulley S B, Cummings S R and Browner W S 1988 Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach (Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins)
9. Bonnick S L, Johnston C C, Kleerekoper M, Lindsay R, Miller P, Sherwood L et al 2001 Importance of precision in bone density measurements J. Clin. Densitom. 4(2) 105-10
10. Bland J M and Altman D G 1994 Regression towards the mean Br. Med. J. 308(6942) 1499
11. Johnson J and Dawson-Hughes B 1991 Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements Calcif. Tissue Intl. 49(3) 174-8
12. Glüer C C 2000 The use of bone densitometry in clinical practice Bailliere's Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 14(2) 195-211
13. Cummings S R, Palermo L, Browner W, Marcus R, Wallace R, Pearson J et al 2000 Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the mean. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group J. Am. Med. Assoc. 283(10) 1318-21
14. Holbrook T L, Barrett-Connor E, Klauber M and Sartoris D 1991 A population- based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dualphoton absorptiometry of the spine and hip Calcif. Tissue Intl. 49(5) 305-7
15. Njeh C F, Boivin C M and Langton C M 1997 The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review Osteoporos. Inti. 7(1) 7-22
16. Szaflarski N L and Slaughter R E 1996 Technology assessment in critical care: understanding statistical analyses used to assess agreement between methods of clinical measurement [see comments] Am. J. Crit. Care 5(3) 207-16
17. Bland J M and Altman D G 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1(8476) 307-10
18. Bland J M and Altman D G 1999 Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [see comments] Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8(2) 135-60
19. Altman D G and Bland J M 1983 Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies Statistician 32(3) 307-17
20. Armitage P and Berry G 1988 Statistical Methods in Medical Research (Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications)
21. Greenfield M L, Kuhn J E and Wojtys E M 1998 A statistics primer. Correlation and regression analysis Am. J. Sports Med. 26(2) 338-43
22. Mandel J 1984 Fitting straight lines when both variables are subject to error J. Quality Technol. 16(1) 1-14
23. Meinert C L 1996 Clinical Trials Dictionary (Baltimore)
24. Garland S W, Lees B and Stevenson J C 1997 DXA longitudinal quality control: a comparison of inbuilt quality assurance, visual inspection, multi-rule Shewhart charts and Cusum analysis Osteoporos. Intl. 7(3) 231-7
25. Lu Y, Mathur A K, Blunt B A, Gluer C C, Will A S, Fuerst TP et al 1996 Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: comparison of visual examination and process- control charts J. Bone Miner. Res. 11(5) 626-37
26. Pearson D and Cawte SA 1997 Long-term quality control of DXA: a comparison of Shewhart rules and Cusum charts Osteoporos. Intl. 7(4) 338-43
27. Orwoll E S, Oviatt S K and Biddle J A 1993 Precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: development of quality control rules and their application in longitudinal studies J. Bone Miner. Res. 8(6) 693-9
28. Faulkner K G and McClung M R 1995 Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials Osteoporos. Intl. 5(4) 218-27