Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 669-676

  Modlesky, Christopher M ^b   Lewis, Richard D ^a   Yetman, Kimberly A ^b   Rose, Barbra ^b   Rosskopf, Linda B ^b   Snow, Teresa K ^b   Sparling, Phillip B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

body composition; bone mineral content; bone mineral density; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTIOMETRY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY FAT; BODY MASS; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMUR NECK; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0029969039     PISSN: 00029165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/64.5.669     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC, et al. Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1503-14.
2. Mazess RB, Trempe JA, Bisek JP, Hanson JA, Hans D. Calibration of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for bone density. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:799-806.
3. Laskey MA, Flaxman ME, Barber RW, et al. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers. Br J Radiol 1991;64:1023-9.
4. Pocock NA, Sambrook PN, Nguyen T, Kelly P, Freund J, Eisman JA. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of Lunar and Hologic instruments. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:1081-4.
5. Svendsen OL, Marslew U, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems. Eur J Nucl Med 1992;19:41-6.
6. Tothill P, Avenell A, Love J, Reid DM. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr 1994;48:781-94.
7. Tothill P, Avenell A, Reid DM. Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers. Br J Radiol 1994;67:1210-7.
8. Horber FF, Thomi F, Casez JP, Fonteille J, Jaeger PH. Impact of hydration status on body composition as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal volunteers and patients on haemodialysis. Br J Radiol 1992;65:895-900.
9. Mazess R, Chestnut CH, McClung M, Genant H. Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;51:14-7.
10. Svendsen OL, Haarbo J, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Accuracy of measurements of body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in vivo. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;57:605-8.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
12. Pritchard JE, Nowson CA, Strauss BJ, Carlson JS, Kaymakci B, Wark JD. Evaluation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as a method of measurement of body fat. Eur J Clin Nutr 1993;47:216-28.
13. Gundry CR, Miller CW, Ramos E, et al. Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: clinical experience with two different systems, Radiology 1990;174:539-41.
14. Jebb SA, Goldberg GR, Jennings G, Marinos E. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition: effects of depth and tissue thickness, including comparisons with direct analysis. Clin Sci 1995;88:319-24.
15. Snead DB, Birge SJ, Kohrt WM. Age-related differences in body composition by hydrodensitometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:770-5.
16. Milliken LA, Going SB, Lohman TG. Use of DXA to detect soft tissue phantoms placed upon the body. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27(suppl):S117(abstr).
17. Jensen MD, Kanaley JA, Reed JE, Sheedy PF. Measurement of abdominal and visceral fat with computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:274-8.
18. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson J. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and softtissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;51:1106-12.
19. Cullum ID, ElI PJ, Ryder JP. X-ray dual-photon absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of bone density. Br J Radiol 1989;62:587-92.
20. Hangartner TN, Johnston CC. Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry. Bone Miner 1990;9:71-81.
21. Laskey MA, Lyttle KD, Flaxman ME, Barber RW. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46:39-45.
22. Blake GM, McKeeney DB, Chhaya SC, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: the effects of beam hardening on bone density measurements. Med Phys 1992;19:459-65.
23. Buhl K, Heymsfield S, Russell-Aulet M, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr, Lichtman S. Effect of tissue thickness on bone density and bone mineral by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. FASEB J 1991;5:A924(abstr).
24. Abrahamsen B, Gram J, Hansen TB, Beck-Nielsen H. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements. Bone 1995;16:385-90.
25. Van Loan MD, Keim NL, Berg K, Mayclin PL. Evaluation of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:587-91.