MolDock: A new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 49, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 3315-3321

  Thomsen, René ^a   Christensen, Mikael H ^a  

^a Bldg 1090 ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PREDICTION; SCORING SYSTEM;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 33744826819     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm051197e     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C. D., Jr.; Vecchi, M. P. Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science 1983, 220, 671-680.
2. Goodsell, D. S.; Olson, A. J. Automated Docking of Substrates to Proteins by Simulated Annealing. Proteins 1990, 8, 195-202.
3. Westhead, D. R.; Clark, D. E.; Murray, C. W. A Comparison of Heuristic Search Algorithms for Molecular Docking. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 209-228.
4. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and Validation of a Genetic Algorithm for Flexible Docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
5. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated Docking Using a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm and an Empirical Binding Free Energy Function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
6. Storn, R.; Price, K. Differential Evolution - A Simple and Efficient Adaptive Scheme for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces; Technical Report; International Computer Science Institute: Berkley, CA, 1995.
7. Thomsen, R. Flexible Ligand Docking Using Differential Evolution, Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2003, 4, 2354-2361.
8. Gehlhaar, D. K.; Verkhivker, G.; Rejto, P. A.; Fogel, D. B.; Fogel, L. J.; Freer, S. T. Docking Conformationally Flexible Small Molecules into a Protein Binding Site through Evolutionary Programming. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Evolutionary Programming 1995, 615-627.
9. Gehlhaar, D. K.; Bouzida, D.; Rejto, P. A. Fully Automated and Rapid Flexible Docking of Inhibitors Covalently Bound to Serine Proteases. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Evolutionary Programming 1998, 449-461.
10. Yang, J.-M; Chen, C.-C. GEMDOCK: A Generic Evolutionary Method for Molecular Docking. Proteins 2004, 55, 288-304.
11. Nissink, J. W. M.; Murray, C.; Hartshorn, M.; Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Taylor, R. A New Test Set for Validating Predictions of Protein-Ligand Interaction. Proteins 2002, 49, 457-471.
12. Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T. A. Glide: A New Approach for Rapid Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739-1749.
13. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A Fast Flexible Docking Method Using an Incremental Construction Algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
14. Kramer, B.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. Evaluation of the FlexX Incremental Construction Algorithm for Protein-Ligand Docking. Proteins 1999, 37, 228-241.
15. Jain, A. N. Surflex: Fully Automatic Molecular Docking Using a Molecular Similarity-Based Search Engine. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 499-511.
16. Glide treats bonds to methyl groups as rigid, resulting in a slightly lower number of rotatable bonds than the ones reported in Table 1.
17. Clark, M.; Cramer, R. D.; Van Opdenbosch, N. Validation of the General-Purpose TRIPOS 5.2 Force Field. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 982-1012.
18. Cole, C. J.; Murray, C. W.; Nissink, J. W. M.; Taylor, R. D.; Taylor, R. Comparing Protein-Ligand Docking Programs Is Difficult. Proteins 2005, 60, 325-332.
19. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2287-2303.
20. Stouten, P. F. W.; Frömmel, C.; Nakamura, H.; Sander, C. An Effective Solvation Term Based on Atomic Occupancies for Use in Protein Simulations. Mol. Simul. 1993, 10, 97-120.
21. Michalewicz, Z. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1992.
22. Michalewicz, Z.; Fogel, D. B. How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2000.
23. The variance is computed as the average of the distances between a mean individual and every individual in the population.
24. Vesterstrøm, J.; Thomsen, R. A Comparative Study of Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Evolutionary Algorithms on Numerical Benchmark Problems. Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2004, 2, 1980-1987.
25. Ursem, R. K.; Vadstrup, P. Parameter Identification of Induction Motors Using Differential Evolution. Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2003, 2, 790-796.
26. Paterlini, S.; Krink, T. Differential Evolution And Particle Swarm Optimization in Partitional Clustering. Comput. Stat. Data. An. 2005, 50, 1220-1247.
27. Shoemake, K. Uniform Random Rotations. In Graphics Gems III, 1st ed.; Kirk, D., Ed.; AP Professional (Academic Press); Boston, MA, 1992; pp 124-132.
28. Hendlich, M.; Rippmann, F.; Barnickel, G. LIGSITE: Automatic and Efficient Detection of Potential Small Molecule-Binding Sites in Proteins. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1998, 15, 359-363.
29. McDonald, I. K.; Thornton, J. M. Satisfying Hydrogen Bonding Potential in Proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 238, 777-793.