Evaluating undergraduate preclinical operative skill; use of a glance and grade marking system

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 679-684

  Jenkins, S M ^a   Dummer, P M H ^a   Gilmour, A S M ^a   Edmunds, D H ^a   Hicks, R ^a   Ash, P ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Examiner consistency; Preclinical skill; Undergraduate education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL SURGERY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STANDARD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTISTRY, OPERATIVE; EDUCATION, DENTAL; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 0032209446     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00033-X     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Natkin E., Guild R.E. Evaluation of preclinical laboratory performance: a systematic study. Journal of Dental Education, 1967;31:152-161.
2. Lilley J.D., Bruggen Cate H.J., Holloway P.J. et al. Reliability of practical tests in operative dentistry. British Dental Journal, 1968;125:194-197.
3. Fuller J.D. The effects of training and criterion models on inter-judge reliability. Journal of Dental Education, 1972;36:19-22.
4. Salvendy G., Hinton W.M., Ferguson G.W. et al. Pilot study on criteria in cavity preparation. Journal of Dental Education, 1973;37:27-31.
5. Feil P.H. An analysis of the reliability of a laboratory evaluation system. Journal of Dental Education, 1982;46:489-495.
6. Schiff A.J., Salvendy G., Root C.M. et al. Objective evaluation of quality in cavity preparation. Journal of Dental Education, 1975;39:92-96.
7. Goepferd S.J., Kerber P.E. A comparison of two methods for evaluating primary class II cavity preparations. Journal of Dental Education, 1980;44:537-542.
8. Vann W.F., Machen J.B., Hounshell P.B. Effects of criteria and checklists on reliability in preclinical evaluation. Journal of Dental Education, 1983;47:671-675.
9. Houpt, M.I. and Kress, G., Evaluation training: training raters to evaluate clinical performance. Quintessence International November 1979;10:67-76.