German dental faculty attitudes towards computer assisted learning and their correlation with personal and professional profiles

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 123-130

  Welk, A ^a,b   Rosin, M ^a,c   Seyer, D ^a   Splieth, C ^a   Siemer, M ^a   Meyer, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer assisted learning; Evidence based medical dental education; Graduate and postgraduate and continuing medical dental education; Information and communication technology; Problem based learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DENTAL EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, DENTAL; FACULTY, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 27244444243     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2005.00370.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kulik CLC, Kulik JA. Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: an updated analysis. Comput Human Behav 1991: 7: 75-94.
2. Sivin-Kachela J, Bialo ER. Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools '95-'96. Washington, D.C.: Software Publishers Association, 1996.
3. Mast TA, Bellanti ND. Expanding the role of behavioral objectives in dental education. J Am Coll Dent 1976: 43:249-256.
4. Murray TS, Cupples RW, Barber JH, Hannay DR, ScottDB. Computer-assisted learning in undergraduate medical teaching. Lancet 1976: 1: 474-476.
5. Rosenberg H, Grad HA, Matear DW. The effectiveness of computer-aided, self-instructional programs in dental education: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent Educ 2003: 67: 524-532.
6. Coles C. The process of learning: In: Jolly B, Rees L, eds.Medical education in the millennium. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998: 63-82.
7. Long AF, Mercer PE, Stephens CD, Grigg P. Theevaluation of three computer-assisted learning packages for general dental practitioners. Br Dent J 1994: 177: 410-415.
8. Grigg P, Stephens CD. Computer-assisted learningin dentistry. A view from the UK. J Dent 1998: 26: 387-395.
9. Williams C, Aubin S, Harkin P, Cottrell D. A randomized,controlled, single-blind trial of teaching provided by a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture.Med Educ 2001: 35: 847-854.
10. Lechner SK, Lechner KM, Thomas GA. Evaluation of a computer-aided learning program in removable partial denture framework designing. J Prosthodont 1999: 8:100-105.
11. Jelovsek FR, Adebonojo L. Learning principles as appliedto computer-assisted instruction. MD Comput 1993: 10:165-172.
12. Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner centred approaches inmedical education. BMJ 1999: 318: 1280-1283.
13. Shuler CF. Keeping the curriculum current with research and problem-based learning. J Am Coll Dent 2001: 68:20-24.
14. Yip HK, Barnes IE. Information technology in dental education. Br Dent J 1999: 187: 327-332.
15. Pollard DJ, Davenport JC. An evaluation of training general dental practitioners in partial denture designusing a computer-assisted learning program. Br Dent J 1994: 177: 405-409.
16. Mercer PE, Ralph JP. Computer-assisted learning and the general dental practitioner. Br Dent J 1998: 184: 43-46.
17. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors. Recommendationson undergraduate medical education.London: General Medical Council, 1993.
18. Chaves JF, Lantz MS. Educating the next generation ofdentists. J Indiana Dent Assoc 2001: 80: 10-15.
19. Calman K. The role of informatics in the future NHS. In:Dollery C, Williams J, eds. Informatics in undergraduate medical and dental education. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited, 1996: 5.
20. Schleyer T, Spallek H. An evaluation of five dentalInternet portals. J Am Dent Assoc 2002: 133: 204-212.
21. Finkeissen E, Bohret S, Stamm I et al. AIDA: web agents to support dental treatment planning. Int J Comput Dent 2002: 5: 133-138.
22. Guest GF. Internet resources for dentistry: governmentand medical sites for the dental professional. J ContempDent Pract 2000: 1: 75-88.
23. Schleyer TK, Johnson LA. Evaluation of educationalsoftware. J Dent Educ 2003: 67: 1221-1228.
24. Carrotte P, Davis L, Duffin R, Griffiths A, Walsh T. Thedevelopment of two computer assisted learning (CAL)packages with restorative dentistry. Comput TeachingInitiative Centre Med Updat 1996: 7: 8-11.
25. Levine RS, Jones JH, Morgan C. Comparison of computer-assisted learning with tutorial teaching in a groupof first-year dental students. Med Educ 1987: 21: 305-309.
26. Goddy G. Tertiary educators' perceptions of and attitude stoward emerging educational technologies. Higher Educ R&D 1998: 16: 343-356.
27. Dornan T, Maredia N, Hosie L, Lee C, Stopford A. Aweb-based presentation of an undergraduate clinical skills curriculum. Med Educ 2003: 37: 500-508.
28. Statham DS, Torell CR. Computers in the classroom: the impact of technology on student learning. Boise, ID: U.S.Army Research Institute and Boise State University, 1996.
29. Hamilton NM, Furnace J, Duguid KP, Helms PJ, SimpsonJG. Development and integration of CAL: a case study inmedicine. Med Educ 1999: 33: 298-305.
30. Abbey LM. Some comments on the state of dentalinformatics. J Dent Educ 1981: 55: 647-648.
31. Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ 2003: 37:267-277.