Efficacy of periprostatic local anesthetic for prostate biopsy analgesia: A meta-analysis

Urology

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1224-1228

  Richman, Jeffrey M ^a   Carter, H Ballentine ^a   Hanna, Marie N ^a   Murphy, Jamie D ^a   Rowlingson, Andrew J ^a   Andrews, Robert A F ^a   Wu, Christopher L ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICAINE; BUPIVACAINE; LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; MEPIVACAINE;

ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA BASE; DRUG EFFICACY; HUMAN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; META ANALYSIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN; PROSTATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 33744541491     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.030     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Davis M., Sopher M., Kim S.S., et al. The procedure of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. a survey of patient preparation and biopsy technique. J Urol 16 (2002) 566-570
2. Soloway M.S. Do unto others-why I would want anesthesia for my prostate biopsy. Urology 62 (2003) 973-975
3. Obek C., Onal B., Ozkan B., et al. Is periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy associated with increased infectious or hemorrhagic complications? A prospective randomized trial. J Urol 168 (2002) 558-561
4. Rosenthal R. Meta-analysis. a review. Psychosom Med 53 (1991) 247-271
5. Addla S.K., Adeyoju A.A., Wemyss-Holden G.D., et al. Local anaesthetic for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Urol 43 (2003) 441-443
6. Bozlu M., Atici S., Ulusoy E., et al. Periprostatic lidocaine infiltration and/or synthetic opioid (meperidine or tramadol) administration have no analgesic benefit during prostate biopsy. A prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing different methods. Urol Int 72 (2004) 308-311
7. Inal G., Yazici S., Adsan O., et al. Periprostatic nerve blockade before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. the Ankara Numune experience. Urol Int 71 (2003) 165-167
8. Inal G., Yazici S., Adsan O., et al. Effect of periprostatic nerve blockade before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on patient comfort. a randomized placebo controlled study. Int J Urol 11 (2004) 148-151
9. Nambirajan T., Woolsey S., Mahendra V., et al. Efficacy and safety of peri-prostatic local anaesthetic injection in trans-rectal biopsy of the prostrate. a prospective randomised study. Surgeon 2 (2004) 221-224
10. Nash P.A., Bruce J.E., Indudhara R., et al. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 155 (1996) 607-609
11. Obek C., Ozkan B., Tunc B., et al. Comparison of 3 different methods of anesthesia before transrectal prostate biopsy. a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 172 (2004) 502-505
12. Pareek G., Armenakas N.A., and Fracchia J.A. Periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol 166 (2001) 894-897
13. Rabets J.C., Jones J.S., Patel A.R., et al. Bupivacaine provides rapid, effective periprostatic anaesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 93 (2004) 1216-1217
14. Schostak M., Christoph F., Muller M., et al. Optimizing local anesthesia during 10-core biopsy of the prostate. Urology 60 (2002) 253-257
15. Seymour H., Perry M.J., Lee-Elliot C., et al. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy. the advantages of periprostatic local anaesthesia. BJU Int 88 (2001) 540-544
16. Stirling B.N., Shockley K.F., Carothers G.G., et al. Pain perception during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy. an objective analysis of local anesthesia use. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5 (2002) 209-211
17. Trucchi A., De Nunzio C., Mariani S., et al. Local anesthesia reduces pain associated with transrectal prostatic biopsy. A prospective randomized study. Urol Int 74 (2005) 209-213
18. Vanni A.P., Schaal C.H., Costa R.P., et al. Is the periprostatic anesthetic blockade advantageous in ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy?. Int Braz J Urol 30 (2004) 114-118
19. von Knobloch R., Weber J., Varga Z., et al. Bilateral fine-needle administration of local anaesthetic nerve block for pain control during TRUS-guided multi-core prostate biopsy. a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol 41 (2002) 508-514
20. Wu C.L., Carter H.B., Naqibuddin M., et al. Effect of local anesthetics on patient recovery after transrectal biopsy. Urology 57 (2001) 925-929
21. Ozden E., Yaman O., Gogus C., et al. The optimum doses of and injection locations for periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled study. J Urol 170 (2003) 2319-2322
22. Lee-Elliott C.E., Dundas D., and Patel U. Randomized trial of lidocaine vs lidocaine/bupivacaine periprostatic injection on longitudinal pain scores after prostate biopsy. J Urol 171 (2004) 247-250
23. Schulz K.F., Chalmers I., and Altman D.G. The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 136 (2002) 254-259
24. Farrar J.T., Portenoy R.K., Berline J.A., et al. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88 (2000) 287-294
25. Farrar J.T., Berlin J.A., and Strom B.L. Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures. a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage 25 (2003) 406-411
26. Cepeda M.S., Africano J.M., Polo R., et al. What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?. Pain 105 (2003) 151-157
27. Collins S.L., Moore R.A., and McQuay H.J. The visual analogue pain intensity scale. what is moderate pain in millimetres?. Pain 72 (1997) 95-97
28. Machado M.T., Aragao A.J., Rodrigues A.O., et al. Periprostatic local anesthesia in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. is it possible to improve pain tolerance?. Int Braz J Urol 28 (2002) 323-329
29. Moher D., Pham B., Jones A., et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 352 (1998) 609-613
30. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carroll D., et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials. is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 17 (1996) 1-12
31. Balk E.M., Bonis P.A., Moskowitz H., et al. Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 287 (2002) 2973-2982
32. Clark H.D., Wells G.A., Huet C., et al. Assessing the quality of randomized trials. reliability of the Jadad scale. Control Clin Trial 20 (1999) 448-452
33. LeLorier J., Gregoire G., Benhaddad A., et al. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 337 (1997) 536-542
34. Ioannidis J.P., Cappelleri J.C., and Lau J. Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials. JAMA 279 (1998) 1089-1093
35. LeLorier J., and Gregoire G. Comparing results from meta-analyses vs large trials. JAMA 280 (1998) 518-519
36. Moher D., Pham B., Lawson M.L., et al. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess 7 (2003) 1-90
37. Gregoire G., Derderian F., and Le Lorier J. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis. is there a Tower of Babel bias?. J Clin Epidemiol 48 (1995) 159-163
38. Juni P., Holenstein F., Sterne J., et al. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials. empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 31 (2002) 115-123