Efficacy and safety of peri-prostatic local anaesthetic injection in trans-rectal biopsy of the prostrate: A prospective randomised study

Surgeon

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 221-224

  Nambirajan, T ^a,b   Woolsey, S ^a   Mahendra, V ^a   Walsh, I K ^a   Lynch, T H ^a   Keane, P F ^a  

^a BELFAST CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Local anaesthesia; Prostate biopsy; Trans rectal ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; PLACEBO; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; FISHER EXACT TEST; HEMATURIA; HEMOSPERMIA; HUMAN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; SCORING SYSTEM; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 4344693579     PISSN: 1479666X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1479-666X(04)80004-0     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Dore B, Aubert J. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79(4): 608-10.
2. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, McKelvie GB. Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies - true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 1993; 71(4): 460-63.
3. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, Peeling WB. Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol 1993; 47(2): 125-26.
4. Takahashi H, Ouchi T. The ultrasonic diagnosis in the field of urology (the first report). Proc Jap Soc Ultrasonics Med 1963; 3: 7.
5. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142(1): 71-75.
6. Scherr DS, Eastham J, Ohori M, Scardino PT. Prostate biopsy techniques and indications: when, where and how? Semin Urol Oncol 2002; 20(1): 18-31.
7. Presti Jr JC, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163(1): 166-67.
8. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997; 50(4): 562-66.
9. Djavan B, Waldert M, Zlotta A, Dobronski P, Seitz C, Remzi M et al. Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study. J Urol 2001; 166(3): 856-60.
10. Naughton CK, Ornstein DK, Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Pain and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial of 6 versus 12 cores. J Urol 2000; 163(1): 168-71.
11. Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS. Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology 1997; 49(3): 426-34.
12. Moffat NA. Transurethral prostatic resections under local anaesthesia. J Urol 1977; 118(4): 607-8.
13. Orandi A. Urological endoscopic surgery under local anaesthesia: a cost reducing idea. J Urol 1984; 132(6): 1146-47
14. Irani I, Bon D, Fournier F, Dore B, Aubert J. Patient acceptability of transurethral incision of the prostate under local anaesthesia. Br J Urol 1996; 78(6): 904-6.
15. Akalin Z, Mungan NA, Basar H, Aydoganli L, Cengiz T. Transurethral resection of the prostate and laser prostatectomy under local anaesthesia. Eur Urol 1998; 33(2): 202-5.
16. Reddy PK. New technique to anaesthetise the prostate for transurethral balloon dilatation. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17(1): 55-56.
17. Smathers S, Wallner K, Simpson C, Roof J. Patient perception of local anaesthesia for prostate brachytherapy. Semin Urol Oncol 2000; 18(2): 142-46.
18. Desgrandchamps F, Meria P, Irani J, Desgrippes A, Teillac P, Le Duc A. The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate: a prospective randomised placebo-controlled study. BJU Int 1999; 83(9): 1007-9.
19. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T, Petros JA, Labadia AJ, Anastasia K, Miller LE, Marshall FF. A randomised prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: the Emroy University experience. J Urol 2000; 164(2): 397-99.
20. Saad F, Sabbagh R, McCormack M, Peolquin F. A prospective randomised trial comparing lidocaine and lubricating gel on pain level in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy. Can J Urol 2002; 9(4): 1592-94.
21. Massood J, Shah N, Lane T, Andrews H, Simpson P, Barua JM. Nitrous oxide (Entonox) inhalation and tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a double-blind randomised controlled study. J Urol 2002; 168(1): 116-20.
22. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1996; 155(2): 607-9.
23. Alavi AS, Soloway MS, Vaidya A, Lynne CM, Gheiler EL. Local anaesthesia for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial comparing 2 methods. J Urol 2001; 166(4): 1343-45.
24. Seymour H, Perry MJ, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anaesthesia. BJU Int 2001; 88(6): 540-44.
25. Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA. Periprostatic nerve blockade for transtectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol 2001; 166(3): 894-97.
26. Leibovici D, Zisman A, Siegel YI, Sella A, Kleinmann J, Lindner A. Local anaesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol 2002; 167(2pt1): 563-65.
27. P Hammerer. Editorial comment. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 514.
28. Aus G, Hermansson CG, Hugosson J, Pedersen KV. Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complications and acceptance by patients. Br J Urol 1993; 71(4): 457-59.