Periprostatic nerve blockade before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: The Ankara numune experience

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 165-167

  Inal, Gurdal ^a   Yazici, Sertaç ^a,b   Adsan, Öztug ^a   Özturk, Bulent ^a   Çetinkaya, Mesut ^a  

^a ANKARA TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Biopsy; Pain; Prostate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INJECTION; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NEEDLE; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; LIDOCAINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTATE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 0043175105     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000071840     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL Jr, et al: Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1990;143:1146-1154.
2. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, et al: Multiple transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsies: True morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 1993;71:460-463.
3. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, et al: Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol 1993; 47:125-126.
4. Eskew LA, Bore RL, McCullough DL: Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997;157:199-203.
5. Nova L, Montors F, Consanni P, et al: Results of a prospective randomized study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies in patients with elevated PSA, normal DRE and normal prostatic ultrasound (abstract 226). J Urol 1997;157(suppl):59.
6. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, et al: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1996;155:607-609.
7. Soloway MS, Obek C: Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000;163:172-173.
8. Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA: Periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol 2001;166:894-897.
9. Vaidya A, Soloway MS: Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: an update of the Miami experience. Eur Urol 2001;40:135-138.
10. Alavi A, Soloway MS, Vaidya A, et al: Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods. J Urol 2001;166:1343-1345.
11. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T, et al: A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: The Emory University experience. J Urol 2000;164:397-399.
12. Chang SS, Alberts G, Wells N, et al: Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 2001;166:2178-2180.
13. Scott J, Huskisson EC: Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976;2:175-177.
14. Rodriguez LV, Terris MK: Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: A prospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1998;160:2115-2120.
15. Birch BRP, Anson KM, Miller RA: Sedo-analgesia in urology. A safe, cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia. A review of 1020 cases. Br J Urol 1990;66:342-350.