Practices, theories, and traditions: Further thoughts on the disciplinary identities of english and communication studies

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 129-138

  Mailloux, Steven ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646818420     PISSN: 02773945     EISSN: 1930322X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02773940309391248     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, Amanda, and Joseph Valente, eds. Disciplinarity at the Fin de Siecle. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
2. Bernstein, Richard J. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.
3. nded. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2001.
4. Brummett, Barry. Reading Rhetorical Theory. Fort Worth: Harcourt, 2000.
5. ndrev. ed. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 1993.
6. Goggin, Maureen Daly. “The Tangled Roots of Literature, Speech Communication, Linguistics, Rhetoric/Composition, and Creative Writing”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 29 (Fall 1999): 63-87.
7. Graham, Loren, Wolf Lepenies, and Peter Weingart, eds. Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983.
8. Heidegger, Martin. Plato’s Sophist. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and Andre Schuwer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.
9. Keith, William. “Identity, Rhetoric and Myth: A Response to Mailloux and Leff”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 30 (Fall 2000): 95-106.
10. Klein, Julie Thompson. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1990.
11. nded. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
12. Leff, Michael. “Rhetorical Disciplines and Rhetorical Disciplinarity: A Response to Mailloux”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 30 (Fall 2000):83-93.
13. Mailloux, Steven. “Disciplinary Identities: On the Rhetorical Paths between English and Communication Studies”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 30 (Spring 2000): 5-29.
14. Mailloux, Steven. “Rhetorical Hermeneutics Still Again: or, On the Track of Phronesis”. In A Companion to Rhetoric. Ed. Walter Jost and Wendy Olmstead. Oxford: Blackwell, forthcoming.
15. Messer-Davidow, Ellen, David R. Shumway, and David J. Sylvan, eds. Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993.
16. Miller, Thomas. “Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: AResponse to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31 (Summer 2001): 105-17.
17. Nystrand, Martin. “Distinguishing Formative and Receptive Contexts in the Disciplinary Formation of Composition Studies: A Response to Mailloux”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31 (Summer 2001): 93-103.