Identity, rhetoric and myth: A response to Mailloux and leff

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 95-106

  Keith, William ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547181931     PISSN: 02773945     EISSN: 1930322X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02773940009391190     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baird, A. (1943). Discussion: Principles and Types. New York: McGraw-Hill
2. Campbell, J. (1996). “Oratory, democracy and the classroom.” In Democracy, Education and the Schools, ed by R. Soder. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Campbell, J. (1997). “Strategic Reading: Rhetoric, Interpretation and Intention.” In Rhetorical Hermeneutics, ed. by A. Gross and W. Keith. Albany: SUNY Press, 113-137.
4. Fuller, S. (2000). Thomas Kuhn: A philosophical history for our times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Fusfield, W. (1997). “Refusing to believe it: Considerations on public speaking in struction in a post-Machiavellian movement.” Social Epistemologv, 3-4, 253-314.’
6. Gaonkar, D. (1997) ‘The idea of rhetoric in the rhetoric of science.” In Rhetorical Hermeneutics, ed. by A. Gross and W. Keith. Albany: SUNY Press, 25-88.
7. Gross, A., J. Hannon and M. Reidy. (Forthcoming). Communicating Science: A Rhetorical History of the Scientific Article. Oxford University Press.
8. Hart, R. (1984). Verbal style and the presidency: A computer-based analysis. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press.
9. Hart, R. (1987). The sound of leadership: Presidential communication in the modem age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Hart, R. (1996). Seducing America: How television charms the modem voter. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Hart, R. (2000). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
12. Kuhn, T. (1970). “Reply to my critics.” In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231-278.
13. Leff, M. (2000). “Rhetorical Disciplines and Rhetorical Disciplinarity: A Response to Mailloux.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 30:4, 83-93.
14. Mailloux, S. (1998). Reception Histories: Rhetoric, Pragmatism and American Cul tural Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
15. Mailloux, S. (2000). “Disciplinary Identities: On the rhetorical paths between English and Communication Studies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 20, 5-30.
16. McBumey, J. (1937). “Some Contributions of Classical Dialectic to a Philosophy of Discussion.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 23, 1-13.
17. Ross, D. (1991). The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Sproule, J. (1997). Propaganda and Democracy: The American experience of media and mass persuasion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Woolbert, C. (1917). “Conviction and persuasion: Some consequences of theory.” Quarterly Journal of Public Speaking, 3, 249-264.
20. Woolbert, C. (1918). ‘The place of logic in a system of persuasion.” Quarterly Journal of Public Speaking, 4, 19-39.