Disciplinary identities: On the rhetorical paths between English and communication studies

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 5-29

  Mailloux, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646795082     PISSN: 02773945     EISSN: 1930322X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02773940009391173     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Appadurai, Aijun, Lauren Berlant, Carol A. Breckenridge, and Dilip Gaonkar. “Editorial Comment: On Theory’s Empire.” Public Culture 6 (Fall 1993): vii-xi.
2. Applebee, Arthur N. Tradition and Reform in the Teaching of English: A History. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 1974.
3. Benson, Thomas W. Speech Communication in the 20th Century. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985.
4. Berlin, James A. Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900-1985. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1987.
5. Bohman, George V. “Basic Communications Courses Again.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 33 (April 1947): 255-57.
6. Briggs, Harold E. “College Programs in Communication as Viewed by an English Teacher.” College English 9 (February 1948): 327-32.
7. Cain, William E. The Crisis in Criticism: Theory, Literature, and Reform in English Studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.
8. Cain, William E, ed. Reconceptualizing American Literary/Cultural Studies: Rhetoric, History, and Politics in Humanities. New York: Garland Press, 1996.
9. Cohen, Herman. “The Development of Research in Speech Communication: A Historical Perspective.” In Benson 282-98.
10. Cain, William E. The History of Speech Communication: The Emergence of a Discipline, 1914-1945. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1994.
11. Connors, Robert J. “Composition Studies and Science.” College English 45 (January 1983): 1-20.
12. Crowley, Sharon. Composition in the University: Historical and Polemical Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1998.
13. Derrida, Jacques. “Afterword: Toward an Ethic of Discussion.” Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1988. 111-60.
14. Dow, Clyde W. “A Speech Teacher Views College Communication Courses.” College English 9 (February 1948): 332-36.
15. Emig, Janet. “Inquiry Paradigms and Writing.” College Composition and Communication. 33 (February 1982): 64-75.
16. Emig, Janet. “The Tacit Tradition: The Inevitability of a Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Writing Research.” In Reinventing the Rhetorical Tradition. Ed. Aviva Freedman and Ian Pringle. Conway, AR: L S Books, 1980. 9-17.
17. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and Ideology-Critique.” Trans. G. B. Hess and R. E. Palmer. In Jost and Hyde. 313-34.
18. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Apprenticeships. Trans. Robert R. Sullivan. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.
19. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Rhetoric and Hermeneutics.” Trans. Joel Weinsheimer. In Jost and Hyde. 45-59.
20. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2nd ed. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad, 1991.
21. Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar. “Aspepts of Sophistic Pedagogy.” Ph. D. dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, 1984.
22. Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar. “Close Readings of the Third Kind: Reply to My Critics.” In Gross and Keith. 330-56.
23. Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar. “Deconstruction and Rhetorical Analysis: The Case of Paul de Man,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 73 (November 1987): 482-528.
24. Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar. “The Idea of Rhetoric in the Rhetoric of Science. In Gross and Keith. 25-85
25. Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar. “Rhetoric and its Double: Reflections on the Rhetorical Trim in the Human Sciences.” In Simons, The Rhetorical Turn. 341-66.
26. Goggin, Maureen Daly. “The Tangled Roots of Literature, Speech Communication, Linguistics, Rhetoric/Composition, and Creative Writing: A Selected Bibliography on the History of English Studies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 29 (Fall 1999): 63-87.
27. Graff, Gerald. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
28. Gross, Alan G. The Rhetoric of Science. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
29. Gross, Alan G., and William M. Keith, eds. Rhetorical Hermeneutics: Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
30. Hairston, Maxine. “The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 33 (February 1982): 76-88.
31. Jost, Walter, and Michael J. Hyde, eds. Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
32. Keith, William, Steve Fuller, Alan Gross, and Michael Leff. ‘Taking Up the Challenge: A Response to Simons.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 85 (August 1999): 330-38.
33. Kors, Alan Charles. “Did Western Civilization Survive the 20* Century?” The National Interest, no. 58 (Winter 1999/2000): 97-104.
34. Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
35. Leff, Michael. “Hermeneutical Rhetoric.” In Jost and Hyde. 196-214.
36. Leitch, Vincent B. American Literary Criticism from the Thirties to the Eighties. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.
37. Mailloux, Steven. Reception Histories: Rhetoric, Pragmatism, and American Cultural Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
38. Mailloux, Steven. Rhetorical Power. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.
39. Mailloux, Steven. “Rhetorical Pragmatism and the Uses of Literature.” REAL: Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature, 15 (1999): 171-80.
40. Miller, Susan. Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.
41. “Minutes of the Thirty-First Annual Conference.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 33 (April 1947): 230-33.
42. Nelson, John S., Allan Megill, and Donald N. McCloskey, eds. The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
43. North, Stephen M. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook, 1987.
44. Ong, Faye, ed. English-Language Arts Content Standards for California Public Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve. Sacramento: Department of Education, 1998.
45. Overington, M. A. “The Scientific Community as Audience: Towards a Rhetorical Analysis of Science.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (Summer 1977): 143-64.
46. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-iyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.
47. Phelps, Louise Wetherbee. Composition as a Human Science: Contributions to the SelfUnderstanding of a Discipline. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
48. Ryan, J. P. ‘Terminology: The Department of Speech.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech Education 4 (January 1918): 5-11.
49. Scott, Fred Newton. “Rhetoric Rediviva.” Ed. Donald Stewart. College Composition and Communication 31 (December 1980): 413-19.
50. Simons, Herbert W. “The Rhetoric of Inquiry as an Intellectual Movement” In Simons, The Rhetorical Turn. 1-31.
51. Simons, Herbert W. “Rhetorical Hermeneutics and the Project of Globalization.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 85 (February 1999): 86-109.
52. Simons, Herbert W, ed. The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
53. Soule, Michael E., and Gary Lease, eds. Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1995.
54. Stewart, Donald C. and Patricia L. Stewart The Life and Legacy of Fred Newton Scott. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997.
55. Weaver, Andrew Thomas. “Seventeen Who Made History—The Founders of the Association.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 45 (April 1959): 195-99.
56. Weaver, Carl H. “A History of the International Communication Association.” Communication Yearbook 1 (1977): 607-18.
57. Wells, Susan. “Reading Science Rhetorically.” Ch. 2 of Sweet Reason: Rhetoric and the Discourses of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
58. Wells, Susan. “‘Spandrels,’ Narration, and Modernity.” In Understanding Scientific Prose. Ed. Jack Selzer. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993.42-60.
59. Wilson, Gordon. “CCCC in RetrospecL” College Composition and Communication 18 (October 1967): 127-34.
60. Woolbert, Charles H. “The Organization of Departments of Speech Science in Universities.” The Quarterly Journal of Public Speaking 2 (January 1916): 64-77.
61. Wykoff, George S. “Secretary’s Report.” College Composition and Communication 1 (October 1950): 19-21.
62. Yost, Mary. “Argument from the Point of View of Sociology.” Quarterly Journal of Public Speaking 3 (April 1917): 109-24.
63. Young, Richard E. “Paradigms and Problems: Needed Research in Rhetorical Invention.” In Research on Composing: Points of Departure. Ed. Charles R. Cooper and Lee Odell. Urbana: NOTE, 1978.