Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 240, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 481-487

  King, A J W ^a,b   Taguri, A ^a   Wadood, A C ^a   Azuara Blanco, A ^a,c  

^a Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0036947338     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-002-0482-y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Altman DG (1991) Method comparison studies. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London,Chap 14
2. Anderson DR, Patella VM (1999) Interpretation of a single visual field. In: Automated static perimetry, 2nd edn. Mosby, St Louis, Chap 7
3. Anderson DR, Feuer WJ, Alward WL, Skuta GL (1989) Threshold equivalence between perimeters. Am J Ophthalmol 107:493-505
4. Bengtsson B, Heijl A (1998) Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:268-272
5. Bengtsson B, Heijl A (1998) SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:431-437
6. Bengtsson B, Heijl A (1999) Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77:143-146
7. Bengtsson B, HeijI A, Olsson J (1998) Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:165-169
8. Flanagan JG, Wild JM, Trope GE (1993) Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyser, in a glaucomatous population. Ophthalmology 100:949-954
9. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Pareja A (1997) Influence of the "fatigue effect" on the mean deviation measurement in perimetry. Eur J Ophthalmol 7:29-34
10. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Martinez A, Sanchez MJ (1997) Accuracy of Tendency Orientated Perimetry (TOP) in the Octopus 1-2-3 Perimeter. In: Wall A, Heijl A (eds) Perimetry update 1996/1997. Kugler, Amsterdam, pp 119-123
11. Heijl A (1977) Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 55:696-708
12. Heijl A, Drance SM (1983) Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 67:512-516
13. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Lewis RA (1985) Quantitative office perimetry. Ophthalmology 92:862-872
14. Mills RP, Hopp RH, Drance SM (1986) Comparison of quantitative testing with the Octopus, Humphrey, and Tubingen perimeters. Am J Ophthalmol 102:496-504
15. Morales J, Weitzman ML, Gonzalez de la Rosa M (2000) Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 107:134-142
16. Nordmann JP, Denis P, Nguer Y et al (1994) Static threshold visual field in glaucoma with the Fastpac algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Eur J Ophthalmol 4:105-110
17. O'Brien C, Poinoosawmy S, Wu J, Hitchings R (1994) Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 78:516-519
18. Octopus 1-2-3 Perimeter Digest (1991) Interzeag AG, Schlieren, Switzerland
19. Schaumberger M, Schafer B, Lachenmayr BJ (1995) Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:1390-1397
20. Searle AET, Wild JM, Shaw DE, O'Neill EC (1991) Time-related variation in normal automated static perimetry. Ophthalmology 98:701-707
21. Weber J (1990) A new strategy for automated static perimetry. Fortschr Ophthalmol 87:37-40
22. Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA (1999). Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1152-1161
23. Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA (1999) The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1998-2009
24. Zeyen T, Roche M, Brigatti L, Caprioli J (1995) Formulas for conversion between Octopus and Humphrey threshold values and indices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:627-634