A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships

Infection, Genetics and Evolution

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 323-330

  Qiao, Baozhen ^a,b   Goldberg, Tony L ^a   Olsen, Gary J ^a   Weigel, Ronald M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; Disease transmission; Molecular epidemiology; Partial genome sequencing; Phylogenetic reconstruction; Restriction fragment analysis

Indexed keywords

DNA; RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; RESTRICTION MAPPING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOME; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 33646766475     PISSN: 15671348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2005.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akbari A., Albregtsen F., and Lingjærde O.C. Adaptive weighted least squares method for the estimation of DNA fragment lengths from agarose gels. Electrophoresis 23 (2002) 176-181
2. Buckley T.R., Simon C., and Chambers G.K. Exploring among-site rate variation models in maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 67-86
3. Cann A.J. Principles of Molecular Virology. third ed. (2001), Academic Press, San Diego
4. Colless D.H. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. Part II [book review]. Syst. Zool. 31 (1982) 100-104
5. Dice L.R. Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. J. Ecol. 26 (1945) 297-302
6. Dowling T.E., Moritz C., and Palmer J.D. Nucleic acids. Part II: restriction site analysis. In: Hillis D.M., and Moritz C. (Eds). Molecular Systematics (1990), Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts 250-317
7. Fiala K.L., and Sokal R.R. Factors determining the accuracy of cladogram estimation: evaluation using computer simulation. Evolution 39 (1985) 609-622
8. Gill P., Evett I.W., Woodroffe S., Lygo J.E., Millican E., and Webster M. Databases, quality control and interpretation of DNA profiling in the Home Office Forensic Science Service. Electrophoresis 12 (1991) 204-209
9. Gu X., Fu Y., and Li W.H. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 (1995) 546-557
10. Hillis D.M. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 44 (1995) 3-16
11. Housworth E.A., and Martins E.P. Random sampling of constrained phylogenies: conducting phylogenetic analyses when the phylogeny is partially known. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 628-639
12. Jin L., and Nei M. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8 (1991) 356-365
13. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16 (1980) 111-120
14. Kuhner M., and Felsenstein K.J. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11 (1994) 459-468
15. Kumar S., and Gadagkar S.R. Efficiency of the neighbor-joining method in reconstructing deep and shallow evolutionary relationships in large phylogenies. J. Mol. Evol. 51 (2000) 544-553
16. Lynch M. The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7 (1990) 478-484
17. Martins E.P. Conducting phylogenetic comparative studies when the phylogeny is not known. Evolution 50 (1996) 12-22
18. Nei M., and Li W.H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76 (1979) 5269-5273
19. Nei, M., 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
20. Olive D.M., and Bean P. Principles and applications of methods for DNA-based typing of microbial organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37 (1999) 1661-1669
21. Penny D., and Hendy M.D. The use of tree comparison metrics. Syst. Zool. 34 (1985) 75-82
22. Qiao, B., Weigel, R.M., 2004. A computer simulation of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in estimating genetic relationships: an application to papillomavirus DNA sequences. BMC Bioinf. 5, 102 (http://www.biomedcentral/1471-2105/5/102).
23. Rambaut A., and Grassly N.C. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. CABIOS 13 (1997) 235-238
24. Robinson D.F., and Foulds L.R. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53 (1981) 131-147
25. Rohlf F.J., Chang W.S., Sokal R.R., and Kim J. Accuracy of estimated phylogenies: effects of tree topology and evolutionary model. Evolution 44 (1990) 671-684
26. Saitou N., and Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 406-425
27. Shao K., and Sokal R.R. Tree balance. Syst. Zool. 39 (1990) 266-276
28. Sourdis J., and Krimbas C. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 159-166
29. Takahashi K., and Nei M. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17 (2000) 1251-1258
30. Weigel R.M., and Scherba G. Quantitative assessment of genomic similarity from restriction fragment patterns. Prev. Vet. Med. 32 (1997) 95-110
31. Yang Z. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10 (1993) 1396-1401
32. Yang Z. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Tree 11 (1996) 367-372