Sequential Ru-Pd catalysis: A two-catalyst one-pot protocol for the synthesis of N- and O-heterocycles

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 6745-6754

  Trost, Barry M ^a   Machacek, Michelle R ^a   Faulk, Brian D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINES; CATALYSIS; METALS; NITROGEN; PALLADIUM; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); THERMODYNAMICS;

HETEROCYCLIC PRODUCTS; KAINOID INTERMEDIATE; NUCLEOPHILES; OLEFIN PRODUCTS; Z-VINYLSILANE;

RUTHENIUM;

ALKENE DERIVATIVE; BRYOSTATIN; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND; PALLADIUM; ROSE OIL; RUBIDIUM; SILANE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VINYLSILANE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; CHIRALITY; CYCLIZATION; DIASTEREOISOMER; ENANTIOMER; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; METAL BINDING; STEREOISOMERISM; SYNTHESIS;

ALKYNES; CATALYSIS; CYCLIZATION; FURANS; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS; MACROLIDES; PALLADIUM; PIPERIDINES; PYRANS; RUTHENIUM; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 33646749523     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja060812g     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Some notable exceptions: (a) Evans, P. A.; Cui, J.; Gharpure, S. J.; Hinkle, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11456.
2. (b) Marcotte, S.; D'Hooge, F.; Ramadas, S.; Feasson, C.; Pannecoucke, X.; Quirion, J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5879.
3. (c) McDonald, F. E.; Singhi, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7683.
4. (d) Vares, L.; Rein, T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7226.
5. (e) Williams, D. R.; Clark, M. P.; Berliner, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2287.
6. (f) Panek, J. S.; Huang, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9836.
7. (a) Trost, B. M.; Surivet, J.-P.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15592.
8. (b) Trost, B. M.; Shen, H. C.; Pinkerton, A. B. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 2341.
9. (c) Trost, B. M.; Pinkerton, A. B.; Toste, F. D.; Sperrle, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12504.
10. (d) Trost, B. M.; Surivet, J.-P.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2897.
11. (e) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D.; Pinkerton, A. B. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2067.
12. (f) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 714.
13. (g) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7739.
14. Trost, B. M.; Machacek, M. R.; Schnaderback, M. J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1761.
15. (a) Denmark, S. E.; Choi, J. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5821.
16. (b) Hirabayashi, K.; Ando, J.; Mori, A.; Nishihara, Y.; Hiyama, T. Synlett 1999, 99.
17. (c) Shibata, K.; Miyazawa, K.; Goto, Y. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1309.
18. (d) Gouda, K.-I.; Hagiwara, E.; Hatanaka, Y.; Hiyama, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7232.
19. (e) Hatanaka, Y.; Hiyama, T. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 268.
20. (f) Tamao, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Ito, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 6051.
21. (g) Hosomi, A.; Kohra, S.; Tominaga, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 4622.
22. (a) Trost, B. M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 50, 1.
23. (b) Trost, B. M.; Crawley, M. L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2921.
24. Recent examples of dual transition-metal processes: (a) Jeong, N.; Seo, S. D.; Shin, J. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10220.
25. (b) Doi, T.; Kobuko, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Takahashi, T. Org. Synth. 1998, 63, 428.
26. (c) Lopez, F.; Castedo, L.; Mascarenas, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4218.
27. Ru is known to catalyze allylic ionization and allylic substitution reactions: (a) Renaud, J.-L.; Bruneau, C.; Demerseman, B. Synlett 2003, 3, 408.
28. (b) Trost, B. M.; Fraisse, P. L.; Ball, Z. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1059.
29. (c) Trost, B. M.; Fraisse, P. L. Unpublished results.
30. (d) Onitsuka, K.; Matsushima, Y.; Takahashi, S. Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokaishi 2002, 60, 752.
31. (e) Matsushima, Y.; Onitsuka, K.; Kondo, T.; Mitsudo, T.; Takahashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10405.
32. (f) Zhang, S.-W.; Mitsudo, T.; Kondo, T.; Watanabe, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 450. 197.
33. (a) Takahasi, K.; Miyake, A.; Hata, G. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1972, 45, 230.
34. (b) Takahashi, K.; Miyake, A.; Hata, G. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1973, 46, 1012.
35. (c) Brady, D. G. Chem. Commun. 1970, 434.
36. Fiaud, J. C.; Hibon de Gournay, A.; Larchevegere, M.; Kagan, H. B. J. Organomet. Chem. 1978, 154, 175.
37. (e) Tsuji, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kataoka, H.; Takahashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3393.
38. 3 catalyst.
39. (a) Fukuyama, T.; Jow, C.-K.; Cheung, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6373.
40. (b) Fukuyama, T.; Cheung, M.; Jow, C.-K.; Hidai, Y.; Kan, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5831.
41. (c) Wuts, P. G. M.; Northuis, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3889.
42. (a) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4545.
43. (b) Trost, B. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 355.
44. (a) Takahashi, K.; Miyaki, A.; Hata, G. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1972, 45, 230.
45. (b) Stork, G.; Poirier, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1073.
46. (c) Keinan, E.; Roth, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1769.
47. (d) Stanton, S. A.; Felman, S. W.; Parkhurst, C. S.; Godleski, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1964.
48. (e) Keinan, E.; Sahai, M.; Poth, Z.; Nudelman, A.; Herzig, J. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3558.
49. (a) Trost, B. M.; Tenaglia, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2927.
50. (b) Lakhmiri, R.; Lhoste, P.; Sinou, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4669.
51. (c) Thorey, C.; Wilken, J.; Henin, F.; Martens, J.; Mehler, T.; Muzart, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5527.
52. (d) Fournier-Nguefack, C.; Lhoste, P.; Sinou, D. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4353.
53. (e) Hamada, Y.; Seto, N.; Takayanagi, Y.; Nakano, T.; Kara, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7791.
54. (f) Lautens, M.; Fagnou, K.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5650.
55. (a) Trost, B. M.; Bonk, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 8277.
56. (b) Trost, B. M.; Tenaglia, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2931.
57. (a) Trost, B. M.; McEachern, E. J.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12702.
58. (b) Trost, B. M.; McEachern, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8649.
59. (c) Trost, B. M.; Brown, B. S.; McEachern, E. J.; Kuhn, O. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4442.
60. Suzuki, T.; Sato, O.; Hirama, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 4747.
61. Kim, H.; Lee, C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4369.
62. Enantioselective cyclization using boron cocatalysis has been achieved, see ref 15.
63. Low enantioselectivity has been reported: (a) Fournier-Nguefack, C.; Lhoste, P.; Sinou, D. J. Chem. Res. 1988, 105A.
64. Enantioselective allylic cyclizations of alkoxy nucleophiles were developed independently and concurrently with this work: (b) Jiang, L.; Burke, S. D. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1953.
65. (c) Jiang, L.; Burke, S. D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3411.
66. Matched implies that the catalyst reinforces the natural diastereoselectivity of the substrate, and mismatched implies that the catalyst contradicts the natural diastereoselectivity.
67. 1H NMR techniques. In particular, the presence of a strong NOE (generally between 5% and 10%) for cis 2,6- and 2,5-disubstituted compounds was observed between protons adjacent to the heteroatom. The corresponding absence of this NOE confirmed the trans stereochemical assignment of the opposite diastereomer. Furthermore, since the absolute stereochemistry of the starting substrate is known, the absolute configuration of the newly created allylic stereogenic center is also known.
68. For a preliminary account of this work: Trost, B. M.; Machacek, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4693.
69. See compound 85 in the Supporting Information.
70. (a) Trost, B. M.; Patterson, D. E. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1339.
71. (b) Trost, B. M.; Patterson, D. E. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 3279.
72. For definitions of matched and mismatched with respect to the working model see ref 11.
73. Kainic Acid as a Tool in Neurobiology; McGreer, E. G., Olney, J. W., McGreer, D. L., Eds.; Raven Press: New York, 1978 and references therein.
74. Barraclough, P.; Hudhomme, P.; Spray, C. A.; Young, D. W. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 4195.
75. We are very grateful to Douglas W. Young for sending a copy of his original spectra.
76. Seidel, F.; Stoll, M. Helv. Chim. Acta 1959, 42, 1830.
77. Chatterjee, A. K.; Sanders, D. P.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1939.
78. Oda, H.; Sato, M.; Morizawa, Y.; Oshima, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahderon Lett. 1983, 24, 2877.
79. Ohloff, G.; Giersch, W.; Schulte, E.; Karl, H.; Enggist, P.; Demoule, E. Helv. Chim. Acta 1980, 63, 1582.
80. (a) Pillot, J.-P. Bull, Soc. Chim. Fr. 1975, 2143.
81. (b) Colvin, E. W. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1978, 7, 15.
82. (c) Pillot, J.-P. Synth. Commun. 1979, 9, 395.
83. (a) Miller, R. B.; Reichenbach, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 15, 543.
84. (b) Piscopio, A. D.; Minowa, N.; Chakraborty, T. K.; Koide, K.; Bertinato, P.; Nicolaou, K. C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 7, 617.
85. Metal Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinhein, Germany, 1998.
86. (a) Colvin, E. W. Silicon in Organic Synthesis; Buttherworths: London, 1981.
87. (b) Weber, W. P. Silicon Reagents for Organic Synthesis; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1983.
88. 6 catalyst and thus are incompatible with our mixed-metal methodology.
89. Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6671.
90. (a) O'Neil, S. V.; Quickley, C. A.; Snider, B. B. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1970.
91. (b) Kano, S.; Yuasa, Y.; Mochizuki, N.; Shibuya, S. Heterocycles 1990, 30, 263.
92. Wenkert, E.; Bookser, B. C.; Arrhenius, T. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 644.
93. (d) Honda, T.; Hoshi, M.; Tsubuki, M. Heterocycles 1992, 34, 1515.
94. (e) Keusenkothen, P. F.; Smith, M. B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 2485.
95. (f) Wang, C.; Gu, X.; Yu, M. S.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 8355.
96. (a) Petit, G. R.; Day, J. P.; Hartwell, J. L.; Wood, H. B. Nature 1970, 227, 962.
97. (b) Petit, G. R.; Herald, C. L.; Doubek, D. L.; Herald, D. L.; Arnold, E.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6846.
98. Total syntheses: (a) Kageyama, M.; Tamura, T.; Nantz, M. H.; Roberts, J. C.; Somfai, P.; Whritenour, D. C.; Masamune, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7407.
99. (b) Evans, D. A.; Carter, P. H.; Carreira, E. M.; Prunet, J. A.; Charette, A. B.; Lautens, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7540.
100. (c) Ohmori, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Obitsu, T.; Ishikawa, Y.; Nishiyama, S.; Yamamura, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2290.
101. Higher overall yields were obtained when the hydroboration was performed before carbonylation.
102. Other routes have accomplished syntheses of similar pieces with the exocyclic olefin stereochemistry installed in 14 steps: (a) Vakalopoulos, A.; Lampe, T. F. J.; Hoffmann, H. M. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 929.
103. In 18 steps: (b) Hale, K. J.; Hummersome, M. G.; Bhatia, G. S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2189.
104. In 8 steps: (c) Munt, S. P.; Thomas, E. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 8, 480.