Evaluation and standardisation of small-scale canning methods for small white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) canned in tomato sauce

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 86, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1115-1124

  Van Der Merwe, Daleen ^a,c   Osthoff, Garry ^b   Pretorius, Apie J ^a  

^a ARC GRAIN CROPS INSTITUTE   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE   (South Africa)

^c NORTH WEST UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Canning procedures; Canning quality; Dry beans; Evaluation procedures; Small white beans; Small scale canning methods

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 33646560011     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2476     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. De Lange A and Labuschagne M, Multivariate assessment of canning quality, chemical characteristics and yield of small white canning beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L) in South Africa. J Sci Food Agric 81:30-35 (2000).
2. Faris DG and Smith FL, Effect of maturity at time of cutting on quality of dark red kidney beans. Crop Sci 4:66-69 (1964).
3. Hosfield GL, Ghaderi A and Uebersax MA, A factor analysis of yield and sensory and physico-chemical data from tests used to measure culinary quality in dry edible beans. Can J Plant Sci 64:285-293 (1984).
4. Giami SY and Okwechime UI, Physiochemical properties and cooking quality of four new cultivars of Nigerian cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L Wallp). J Sci Food Agric 63:281-286 (1993).
5. Balasubramanian P, Slinkard A, Tyler R and Vandenberg A, A modified laboratory canning protocol for quality evaluation of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). J Sci Food Agric 80:732-738 (2000).
6. Liebenberg AJ, Heenop HW and Fourie MC, Report on the National Dry Bean Cultivar Trials 2002/2003. ARC-Grain Crops Institute, Potchefstroom (2003).
7. Hosfield GL and Uebersax MA, Variability in physiochemical properties and nutritional components of tropical and domestic dry bean germplasm. J Am Soc Hort Sci 105:246-252 (1980).
8. Balasubramanian P, Slinkard A and Vandenberg A, Genotype and environment effect on canning quality of dry bean grown in Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Sci 79:335-342 (1999).
9. Hosfield GL, Uebersax MA and Isleib TG, Seasonal and genotypic effects on yield and physico-chemical seed characteristics related to food quality in dry, edible beans. J Am Soc Hort Sci 109:182-189 (1984).
10. Hosfield GL, Genetic control of production and food quality factors in dry bean. Food Technol 45:98-103 (1991).
11. Davis DR, Effect of blanching methods and process on quality of canned dried beans. Food Prod Dev 10:74-78 (1976).
12. Nordstrom CL and Sistrunk WA, Effect of type of bean, soak time, canning media and storage time on quality attributes and nutritional value of canned dry beans. J Food Sci 42:795-798 (1977).
13. Priestly RJ, Processing and utilisation of dry beans. Evaluation of new cultivars. CSIR Research Report, Document 2/10. CSIR, Pretoria (1978).
14. Anzaldua-Morales A and Brennan JG, Relationship between the physical properties of dried beans and their textural characteristics after processing. J Texture Stud 13:229-240 (1982).
15. Liebenberg AJ, Koen PJ, Van Zyl C and Fourie MC, Report on the National Dry Bean Cultivar Trials 2000/2001. ARC-Grain Crops Institute, Potchefstroom (2001).
16. Bolles AD, Uebersax MA and Hosfield GL, The effect of soak treatment and processing on texture of five commercial classes of beans. Mich Dry Bean Dig 15:9-13 (1990).
17. Wang CR, Chang KC and Grafton K, Canning quality evaluation of pinto and navy beans. J Food Sci 53:772-776 (1988).
18. Bolles AD, Uebersax MA, Hosfield GL and Hamelink RC, Textural parameters derived from shear curves of processed dry edible beans. Mich Dry Bean Dig 6:21-23 (1982).
19. Varner GV and Uebersax MA, Research Report. Mich Dry Bean Dig 19:22-23 (1995).
20. Lu W, Chang KC, Grafton KC and Schwartz PB, Correlations between physical properties and canning quality attributes of navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, L). Cereal Chem 73:788-790 (1996).
21. Forney AK, Halseth DE and Kelly WC, Quality of canned 'Ruddy' kidney beans as influenced by planting date, harvest time and length of storage before canning. J Am Soc Hort Sci 115:1051-1055 (1990).
22. Larsen DM, Uebersax MA, Wilson JG, Ruengsakulrach S and Hosfield GL, Assessment of blanching conditions and calcium ion concentration on canned navy bean quality. Mich Dry Bean Dig 13:6-7, 9, 20 (1988).
23. Quast DG and Da Silva SD, Temperature dependence of hydration rate and effect of hydration on the cooking rate of dry legumes. J Food Sci 42:1299-1303 (1977).
24. Walters KJ, Hosfield GL, Kelly JD and Uebersax MA, Genetics of canning quality in navy beans. Mich Dry Bean Dig 19:8-9 (1995).
25. Ghaderi A, Hosfield GL, Adams MW and Uebersax MA, Variability in culinary quality, component interrelationships and breeding implications in navy and pinto beans. J Am Soc Hort Sci 109:85-90 (1984).
26. Sastry SK, McCafferty FD, Murakami EG and Kuhn GD, A research note. Effects of vacuum hydration on the incidence of splits in canned kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Food Sci 50:1501-1502 (1985).
27. Deshpande SS and Cheryan M, Water uptake during cooking of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Qual Plant Plant Food Hum Nutr 36:157-165 (1986).
28. Uebersax MA, Ruengsakulrach S and Occeňa LG, Strategies and procedures for processing dry beans. Food Technol 45:104-108 (1991).
29. Occeňa LG, Uebersax MA and Shirazi A, Canning quality characteristics of Anasazi beans. Mich Dry Bean Dig 16:2-4, 7 (1992).
30. Walters KJ, Hosfield GL, Uebersax MA and Kelly JD, Navy bean canning quality. Correlations, heritability estimates and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA associated with component traits. J Am Soc Hort Sci 122:338-343 (1997).
31. He F, Purcell AE and Huber CS, Effects of calcium, sucrose and aging on the texture of canned great northern beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.). J Food Sci 54:315-318 (1989).