The relationship between educational ideologies and technology acceptance in pre-service teachers

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 152-165

  Kiraz, Ercan ^a   Ozdemir, Devrim ^b  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational Ideologies; Teacher Education; Technology Acceptance; Technology Adoption

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646547926     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Bajaj, A, & Nidumolu, S. R. (1998). Techniques A feedback model to understand information system usage. Information & Management, 33 (4), 213-224.
2. Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Brosnan, M. J. (1999). Modeling Technophobia: a case for word processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 105-121.
4. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982-1003.
5. Dusick, D., & Yildirim, S. (2000). Faculty Computer Use and Training: Identifying Distinct Needs for Different Populations. Community College Review, 27(4), 33-47.
6. Inan, F., Yildirim, S., & Kiraz, E. (2004) The Design and Development of an Online Learning Support System for Preservice Teachers: A Discussion of Attitudes and Utilization. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 77(1), 3388-3393.
7. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, New York: Guilford.
8. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user's reference guide, Chicago, Illinois, USA: Scientific Software International.
9. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40, 191-204.
10. th International Conference of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, February 28 - March 4, 1999, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
11. O'Neill, W. F. (1990). Educational Ideologies Contemporary Expressions of Educational Philosophy, Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company (Original work published 1981).
12. Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: Better thinking and learning for every child, New York: The Free Press.
13. th Ed.), New York: Free Press.
14. Schumacher, R. E., &. Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to SEM, Manwah, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Semple, A. (2000). Learning theories and their influence on the development and use of educational technologies. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 46 (3), 21-28.
16. Skolnik, M. L. (1998). Higher Education in the 21st Century. Futures, 30 (7), 635-650.
17. Steel, J., & Hudson, A. (2001). Educational Technology in Learning and Teaching: The Perceptions and Experiences of Teaching Staff. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38, 103-111.
18. Stettheimer, T. D., & Cleveland, A. D. (1998, November). Modeling Utilization of Planned Information Technology. Paper presented at The 1998 American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, November 7-11, 1998, Walt Disney World Resort, USA.
19. Surry, D. W., & Land, S. M. (2000). Starategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37 (2), 145-153.
20. UNESCO (2002). Information and Communication Technology in Education: A curriculum for schools and programme of teacher development, Paris: UNESCO.
21. Weiss, J. (1994). Keeping up with the research. Technology & Learning, 14 (5), 30.
22. Yildirim S., & Kiraz, E. (1999). Obstacles in Integrating Online Communication Tools into Preservice Teacher Education: A Case Study. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 15 (3), 23-28.