Democracy and criminal justice in cross-national perspective: From crime control to due process

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 605, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 311-337

  Sung, Hung En ^a  

^a Yale School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative analysis; Criminal justice; Democracy; Democratization

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646534860     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716206287546     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Allen, Francis A. 1996. Habits of legality: Criminal justice and the rule of law. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bayley, David H. 1975. The police and political development in Europe. In The formation of national states in Western Europe, ed. C. Tilly, 328-379. Priceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Bayley, David H. 1985. Patterns of policing: A comparative international analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
4. Bayley, David H. 1996. Police for the future. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bayley, David H. 2005. Changing the guard: Developing democratic police abroad. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Beckett, Katherine, and Bruce Western. 2001. Governing social marginality: Welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishment & Society 3: 43-59.
7. Black, Donald. 1976. The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.
8. Bowman, Kirk, Fabrice Lehoucq, and James Mahoney. 2005. Measuring political democracy: Case expertise, data adequacy, and Central America. Comparative Political Studies 38: 939-970.
9. Burnham, Robert W. 1980. Criminal justice personnel and socio-economic development. Police Studies 3: 3-9.
10. Carothers, Thomas. 2002. The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13: 5-21.
11. Damaska, Mirjan R. 1986. The faces of justice and state authority: A comparative approach to the legal process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Diamond, Larry. 1996. Is the third wave over? Journal of Democracy 7: 20-37.
13. Diehm 2001, James W. 2001. The introduction of jury trials and adversarial elements into the former Soviet Union and other inquisitorial countries. Journal of Transnational Law & Polity 11: 1-38.
14. Di Federico, Giuseppe. 1998. Prosecutorial independence and the democratic requirement of accountability in Italy: Analysis of a deviant case in a comparative perspective. British Journal of Criminology 38: 371-387.
15. DiIulio, John J., Jr. 1997. Are voters fools? Crime, public opinion, and representative democracy. Corrections Management Quarterly 1: 1-5.
16. du Plessis, Anton, and Antoinette Louw. 2005. Crime and crime prevention in South Africa: 10 years after. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 47: 427-446.
17. Farrington, David P., Patrick A. Langan, and Michael Tonry, eds. 2004. Cross-national studies in crime and justice. NCJ 200988. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
18. Faugeron, Claude, and Jean-Michel Le Boulaire. 1988. La Création du Service Social des Prisons et l'évolution de la Réforme Pénitentiaire en France de 1945 à 1958. Guyancourt, France: Centre de Recherches Sociologiques sur le Droit et les Institutions Pénales.
19. Feeley, Malcom, and Edward L. Rubin. 1998. Judicial policy making and the modern state: How the courts reformed America's prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Fionda, Julia. 1995. Public prosecutors and discretion: A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Forster, Peter. 2001. Law and society under a democratic dictatorship: Dr. Banda and Malawi. Journal of Asian and African Studies 36: 275-293.
22. Freedom House. 2005. Freedom in the world 2005: Civic power and electoral politics. New York: Freedom House.
23. Havard, John D. J. 1992. Expert scientific evidence under the adversarial system: A travesty of justice? Journal of the Forensic Science Society 32: 225-235.
24. Hills, Alice. 1996. Towards a critique of policing and national development in Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies 34: 271-291.
25. Hornum, Finn. 1988. Corrections in two social welfare democracies: Denmark and Sweden. Prison Journal 68: 63-82.
26. Howard, Gregory J., Graeme Newman, and William Alex Pridemore. 2000. Theory, method, and data in comparative criminology. In Measurement and analysis of crime and justice; criminal justice 2000, vol. 4, ed. D. Duffee, 139-211. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice.
27. Huber, Peter J. 2003. Robust statistics. New York: Wiley.
28. Kalish, Carol B. 1988. International crime rates. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice.
29. Karstedt, Suzanne. 2001. Durkheim, Tarde and beyond: The global travel of crime policies. Criminal Justice 2: 111-123.
30. Kessler, Amalia D. 2005. Our inquisitorial tradition: Equity procedure, due process, and the search for an alternative to the adversarial. Cornell Law Review 90: 1181-1275.
31. Kézdi, Gábor. 2004. Robust standard error estimation in fixed-effects panel models. Hungarian Statistical Review 9: 95-116.
32. Lewis, Chris. 1999. Police records of crime. In Global report on crime and justice, ed. G. Newman, 43-64. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Liu, Weizheng, and Yingyi Situ. 1999. Criminal courts in China transition: Inquisitorial procedure to adversarial procedure? Crime & Justice International 15: 13-21.
34. Logan, C. H. 1993. Criminal justice performance measures for prisons. In Performance measures for the criminal justice system, ed. J. DiIulio Jr. et al., 19-59. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
35. Ma, Yue. 2002. Prosecutorial discretion and plea bargaining in the United States, France, Germany, and Italy: A comparative perspective. International Criminal Justice Review 12: 22-52.
36. Maguire, Edward R., and Rebecca Schulte-Murray. 2001. Issues and patterns in the comparative international study of police strength. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 42: 75-100.
37. McElligott, Anthony. 1994. Authority, control, and class justice: The role of the Sondergerichte in the transition from Weimar Germany to the Third Reich. Criminal Justice History: An International Annual 15: 209-233.
38. Meintjies-Van der Walt, Lirieka. 2001. Expert evidence in the criminal justice process: A comparative approach. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
39. Moore, Mark H. 1997. Legitimizing criminal justice policies and practices. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 66: 14-21.
40. Morris, Norval. 1995. The contemporary prison: 1965-present. In The Oxford history of the prison: The practice of punishment in Western society, ed. N. Morris and D. J. Rothman, 202-231. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Mukherjee, Satyanshu, and Philip Reichel. 1999. Bringing to justice. In Global report on crime and justice, ed. G. Newman, 65-88. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Murphy, Walter F. 1991. Civil law, common law, and constitutional democracy. Louisiana Law Review 52: 92-126.
43. Neapolitan, Jerome L. 1997. Cross-national crime: A research review and sourcebook. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
44. Neapolitan, Jerome L. 2001. Examination of cross-national variation in punitiveness. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 45: 691-710.
45. Nemityna, Marina. 2001. Trial by jury: A Western or a peculiarly Russian model? International Review of Penal Law 72: 365-370.
46. Neumayer, Eric. 2005. Inequality and violent crime: Evidence from robbery and violent theft. Journal of Peace Research 42: 101-112.
47. Newman, Graeme, and Adam Bouloukos. 1996. What is a criminal justice system? A view from the International Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, November.
48. Newman, Graeme, and Gregory J. Howard. 1999. Data sources and their use. In Global report on crime and justice, ed. Graeme Newman, 1-23. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. O'Brien, Patricia. 1995. The prison on the Continent: Europe, 1865-1965. In The Oxford history of the prison: The practice of punishment in Western society, ed. N. Morris and D. J. Rothman, 178-201. New York: Oxford University Press.
50. O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. Horizontal accountability in new democracies. In The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies, ed. A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M. F. Plattner, 29-52. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
51. O'Reilly, Gregory W. 1997. Opening up Argentina's courts. Judicature 80: 237-240.
52. Packer, Herbert. 1968. Limits of the criminal sanctions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
53. Piano, Aili, and Arch Puddington, eds. 2004. Freedom in the World 2004: The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties. Evanston, IL: Rowman & Littlefield.
54. Pratt, John, and Marie Clark. 2005. Penal populism in New Zealand. Punishment & Society 7: 303-322.
55. Prillaman, William C. 2000. The judiciary and democratic decay in Latin America: Declining confidence in the rule of law. Westport, CT: Praeger.
56. Reichel, Philip L. 2002. Comparative criminal justice systems: A topical approach. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57. Rodrigues, Corinne Davis. 2006. Civil democracy, perceived risk, and insecurity in Brazil: An extension of the systemic social control model. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605: 242-263.
58. Rose, Nicholas. 2000. Government and control. British Journal of Criminology 40: 321-339.
59. Ruddell, Rick. 2005. Social disruption, state priorities, and minority threat: A cross-national study of imprisonment. Punishment & Society 7: 7-28.
60. Ruddell, Rick, and Martin G. Urbina. 2004. Minority threat and punishment: A cross-national analysis. Justice Quarterly 21: 903-931.
61. Shelley, Louise. 1994. Sources of Soviet policing. Police Studies 17: 49-65.
62. Smith, Gordon B. 1992. Perestroika and the procuracy: The changing role of the prosecutor's office in the former USSR. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
63. Smykla, John Ortiz. 1989. Placing Uruguayan corrections in context, 1973-1984: A note on the visiting criminologist's role. Journal of Criminal Justice 17: 25-37.
64. Solomon, Peter H., and Todd S. Foglesong. 2000. Courts and transition in Russia: The challenge of judicial reform. Boulder, CO: Westview.
65. STATA Corporation. 2001. How does XGTLS differ from regression clustered with robust standard errors? http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/xtgls_rob. html.
66. Sung, Hung-En. 2006. Structural determinants of police effectiveness in market democracies. Police Quarterly 9: 3-19.
67. Sutton, John R. 2000. Imprisonment and social classification in five common-law democracies, 1955-1985. American Journal of Sociology 106: 350-386.
68. Tate, C. Neal, and Stacia L. Haynie. 1993. Authoritarianism and the functions of the courts: A time series analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961-1981. Law & Society Review 27: 707-740.
69. Thome, Joseph R. 1998. Searching for democracy: The rule of law and the process of legal reform in Latin America. Paper presented at the Workshop Reforma Judicial, Motivaciones, Proyectos, Caminos Recorridos, Caminos por Recorrer, Instituto Internacional de Sociología Jurídica, Oñati, Gipuzkoa, Spain, April 6-7.
70. Tonry, Michael. 2004. Thinking about crime: Sense and sensibility in American penal culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Trevaskes, Susan. 2004. Propaganda work in Chinese courts: Public trials and sentencing rallies as sites of expressive punishment and public education in the People's Republic of China. Punishment & Society 6: 5-21.
72. Tyler, Tom R. 2003. Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In Crime and justice: A review of research, vol. 30, ed. M. Tonry, 283-357. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. Ungar, Mark. 2002. Elusive reform: Democracy and the rule of law in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
74. Vanhanen, Tatu. 2000. A new data set for measuring democracy. Journal of Peace Research 37: 251-265.
75. Waller, J. Michael. 2004. Tropical Chekists: The secret police legacy in Nicaragua. Demokratizatsiya 12: 427-449.
76. Williams, John Eryl Hall, ed. 1987. Role of the prosecutor - Report of the International Criminal Justice Seminar held at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
77. World Bank. 2005. World development report 2006: Equity and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
78. Zakaria, Fareed. 2003. The future of democracy at home and abroad. New York: Norton.
79. Zalman, Marvin. 2000. Criminal justice and the future of civil liberties. Criminal Justice Review 25: 181-206.
80. Zimring, Franklin E. 2005. Capital punishment and hyper-incarceration: Does American exceptionalism have a future? Paper presented at the 14th World Congress of Criminology, Philadelphia, August 8.
81. Zimring, Franklin E., Gordon Hawkins, and Sam Kamin. 2001. Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you're out in California. New York: Oxford University Press.
82. Zimring Franklin E., and David T. Johnson. 2006. Public opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605: 266-280.