Internet cautions: Experimental games with internet partners

Experimental Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 53-66

  Eckel, Catherine C ^a   Wilson, Rick K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beliefs; Experiment; Internet; Methodology; Trust game

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646486261     PISSN: 13864157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-006-4307-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andreoni, J., & Ragan, P. (2004). Trusting appearances and reciprocating looks: Experimental evidence on gender and race preferences. Unpublished manuscript, Georgia State University.
2. Anderhub V., Rudolf, M., & Carsten, S. (2001). Design and evaluation of an economic experiment via the internet. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46(2), 227-247.
3. Ashraf, N., Iris, B., & Piankov N. (2004). Is trust a bad investment? Kennedy School, Harvard University, Working Paper.
4. Asparouhova, E., Peter, B., & Charles, R. P. (2003) Excess demand and equilibration in multi-security financial markets: The empirical evidence Journal of Financial Markets, 6, 1-21.
5. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142.
6. Bellemare, C., & Kröger, S. (2004). On representative social capital. Tilburg University, CentER Working Paper 2004-57.
7. Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes aren't fair: The effects of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131-144.
8. Bossaerts, P., & Plott, C. (2004). Basic principles of asset pricing theory: Evidence from large-scale experimental financial markets. Review of Finance, 8(2), 135-169.
9. Bossaerts, P., & Plott, C., Zame, W. R. (2003). Prices and portfolio choices in financial markets: Theory and experimental evidence, CalTech Working Paper.
10. Bossaerts, P., Plott, C., & Zame, W. R. (2002). Prices and portfolio choices in financial markets: Econometric evidence, CalTech working paper.
11. Buchan, N. R., Croson, Rachel T. A., & Dawes, R. M. (2002). Swift neighbors and persistent strangers: A cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocity in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 168-206.
12. Burnham, T., & McCabe, K. et al. (2000). Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(1), 57-73.
13. Croson, R.. & Nancy, R. B. (1999). Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games. American Economic Review, 89(2), 386-391.
14. Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2003). Conditional trust: Sex, race, and facial expressions in a trust game. paper prepared for the conference on trust and institutions, Harvard University, April 24-26.
15. Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2004). Is trust a risky decision? . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55(4), 447-466.
16. Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2005). Detecting trustworthiness: Does beauty confound intuition? unpublished manuscript, department of economics, Virginia Tech, March.
17. Forsythe, R. et al. (1992). Anatomy of an experimental political stock market. American Economic Review, 82(5), 1142-1161.
18. Frohlich N., Oppenheimer, J., & Bernard Moore, J. (2001). Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: The costs of anonymity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46(3), 271-90.
19. Glaeser, E. L., & Laibson, D. et al. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal Of Economics, 115(3), 811-846.
20. Hayashi, N., Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control - A cross-societal study. Rationality and Society, 11(1), pp 27-46.
21. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preference, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346-80.
22. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (1996). 'Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games.' American Economic Review, 86(3), 653-60.
23. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review. 92(5), 1644-55.
24. Lucking-Reiley, D. (1999). Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the internet. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1063-1080.
25. McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., & Trouard, T. (2000). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 3777-3781.
26. Plott, C. R. (2000). Markets and information gathering tools, Southern Economic Journal, 67(1), 1-15.
27. Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2001). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of ebay's reputation system. Draft prepared for NBER workshop on empirical studies of electronic commerce.
28. Roth Alvin, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2002). Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and amazon auctions on the internet. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1093-1103.
29. Roth Alvin, E., Prasnikar, V., Mashiro, O.-F., & Shumel, Z. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburg, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 81(5), pp. 1068-95.
30. Scharlemann, J. P. W., Eckel, C. C., Kacelnik, A., & Wilson, R. K. (2001). The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(5), 617-640.
31. Shavit, T., Sonsino, D., & Benzion, U. (2001). A comparative study of lotteries-evaluation in class and on the web. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(4), 483-4-91.
32. Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (1999). Determinants of trust. In D. V. Budescu, I. Erev and R. Zwick (Eds.), Games and behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport, Mahwah, NJ pp. 355-383.
33. Werner, G., Carsten, S., & Matthias S. (forthcoming) Fairness in the mail and opportunism in the internet - A newspaper experiment on ultimatum bargaining, German Economic Review, 4(2), 243-265.
34. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York, Cambridge University Press.