메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 225-256

Risk Communication in Genetic Counselling: A Discursive Approach to Probability

Author keywords

cancer genetics; discourse analysis; genetic counselling; ontological frameworks; probability; propensities; risk; risk communication

Indexed keywords


EID: 33646403681     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354306062537     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (15)

References (39)
  • 3
    • 0036828180 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uncertain risk: Genetic screening for susceptibility to haemochromatosis
    • Bharadwaj, A.(2002).Uncertain risk: Genetic screening for susceptibility to haemochromatosis. Health, Risk & Society, 4,227–240.
    • (2002) Health, Risk & Society , vol.4 , pp. 227-240
    • Bharadwaj, A.1
  • 7
    • 0042123195 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty
    • Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J.(1996).Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58,1–73.
    • (1996) Cognition , vol.58 , pp. 1-73
    • Cosmides, L.1    Tooby, J.2
  • 10
    • 84965750778 scopus 로고
    • Sacks and psychology
    • Edwards, D.(1995).Sacks and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 5,579–596.
    • (1995) Theory & Psychology , vol.5 , pp. 579-596
    • Edwards, D.1
  • 16
    • 0035036117 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Content-blind norms, no norms, or good norms? A reply to Vranas
    • Gigerenzer, G.(2001).Content-blind norms, no norms, or good norms? A reply to Vranas. Cognition, 81,93–103.
    • (2001) Cognition , vol.81 , pp. 93-103
    • Gigerenzer, G.1
  • 21
    • 0004277776 scopus 로고
    • New York Cambridge University Press
    • Hacking, I.(1990). The taming of chance.New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • (1990) The taming of chance
    • Hacking, I.1
  • 22
    • 0031877327 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Women's understanding of their risk of developing breast / ovarian cancer before and after genetic counseling
    • Hallowell, N.,Statham, H., &Murton, F.(1998).Women's understanding of their risk of developing breast / ovarian cancer before and after genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 7,345–364.
    • (1998) Journal of Genetic Counseling , vol.7 , pp. 345-364
    • Hallowell, N.1    Statham, H.2    Murton, F.3
  • 24
  • 25
    • 49649138413 scopus 로고
    • Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness
    • Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A.(1972).Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3,430–454.
    • (1972) Cognitive Psychology , vol.3 , pp. 430-454
    • Kahneman, D.1    Tversky, A.2
  • 29
    • 84970473622 scopus 로고
    • Discourse and uncertainty: Postmodern variations
    • Michael, M.(1994).Discourse and uncertainty: Postmodern variations. Theory & Psychology, 4,383–404.
    • (1994) Theory & Psychology , vol.4 , pp. 383-404
    • Michael, M.1
  • 34
    • 0033289309 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is there a use for tailored print communications in cancer risk communication?
    • Rimer, B.K., &Glassman, B.(1999).Is there a use for tailored print communications in cancer risk communication? Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25,140–148.
    • (1999) Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs , vol.25 , pp. 140-148
    • Rimer, B.K.1    Glassman, B.2
  • 35
    • 0038388306 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘Relatively speaking’: Relativisation of genetic risk in counselling for predictive testing
    • Sarangi, S.,Bennert, K.,Howell, L., &Clarke, A.(2003).‘Relatively speaking’: Relativisation of genetic risk in counselling for predictive testing. Health, Risk & Society, 5,155–170.
    • (2003) Health, Risk & Society , vol.5 , pp. 155-170
    • Sarangi, S.1    Bennert, K.2    Howell, L.3    Clarke, A.4
  • 37
  • 38
    • 0034648924 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gigerenzer's normative critique of Kahneman and Tversky
    • Vranas, P.B.M.(2000).Gigerenzer's normative critique of Kahneman and Tversky. Cognition, 76,179–193.
    • (2000) Cognition , vol.76 , pp. 179-193
    • Vranas, P.B.M.1
  • 39
    • 0035041498 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single-case probabilities and content-neutral norms: A reply to Gigerenzer
    • Vranas, P.B.M.(2001).Single-case probabilities and content-neutral norms: A reply to Gigerenzer. Cognition, 81 105–111.
    • (2001) Cognition , vol.81 , pp. 105-111
    • Vranas, P.B.M.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.