Examining the interrelations among knowledge, interests, and learning strategies

Journal of Teaching in Physical Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 182-199

  Shen, Bo ^a   Chen, Ang ^b,c  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Domain learning; Learning outcomes; Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646391522     PISSN: 02735024     EISSN: 15432769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.25.2.182     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alao, S., & Guthrie, J.T. (1999). Predicting conceptual understanding with cognitive and motivational variables. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 243-253.
2. Alexander, P.A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M.L. Maehr& P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 213-250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Alexander, P.A., Jetton, T.L., & Kulikowich, J.M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559-575.
4. Alexander, P.A., & Murphy, P.K. (1999). Nurturing the seeds of transfer: A domain-specific perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 561-576.
5. Allison, P.C., Pissanos, B.W., Turner, A.P., & Law, D.R. (2000). Preservice physical educators' epistemologies of skillfulness. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 141-161.
6. Armbruster, B.B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R.F. Flippo & D.C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Arnold, P. J. (1979). Meaning in movement: Sport and physical education. London: Heinemann.
8. Bassett, D.R.J., Ainsworth, B.E., Leggett, S.R., Mathien, C.A., Main, J.A., Hunter, D.C., et al. (1996). Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Medicine & Science in Sport and Exercise, 28, 1071-1077.
9. Bollen, K.A. (1987). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
10. Chen, A., & Darst, P.W. (2001). Situational interest in physical education: A function of learning task design. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 150-164.
11. Chen, A., & Darst, P.W. (2002). Individual and situational interest: The role of gender and skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 250-269.
12. Chen, A., Darst, P.W., & Pangrazi, R.P. (1999). What constitutes situational interest? Validating a construct in physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3, 157-180.
13. Chen, A., & Ennis, C.D. (2004). Searching for optimal motivators: Goals, interests, and learning in physical education [Monograph: Contemporary Issues on Motivation]. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 329-338.
14. Chen, A., & Shen, B. (2004). A web of achieving in physical education: Goals, interest, outside-school activity and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 169-182.
15. Corbin, C.B. & Lindsey, R. (1997). Fitness and wellness. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
16. Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. Reviews of Research in Education, 5, 163-198.
17. Ennis, C.D. (1998). Shared expectations: Creating a joint vision for urban schools. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 7, pp. 151-182). New York: JAI Press.
18. Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher's perspective: The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 309-339). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
20. Jöreskog, K.G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8®: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLISTM command language. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
22. Jewett, A.E., Bain, L.L., & Ennis, C.D. (1995). The curriculum process in physical education. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
23. Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structure equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
24. Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation, and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIV, 23-40.
25. Lee, A.M. (1997). Contributions of research on student thinking in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 262-277.
26. Lee, A.M., Landin, D.K., & Carter, J.A. (1992). Student thoughts during tennis instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 256-267.
27. Lee, A.M., & Solmon, M.A. (1992). Cognitive conceptions of teaching motor skill. Quest, 44, 57-71.
28. Loehlin, J.C. (1998). Latent Variable Models (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
29. McKenzie, T.L., & Sallis, J.F. (1996). Physical activity, fitness, and health-related physical education. In S.J. Silverman & C.D. Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education (pp. 223-246). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
30. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424-436.
31. Murphy, P.K., & Alexander, P.A. (2002). What counts? The predictive powers of subject-matter knowledge, strategic processing, and interest in domain-specific performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 197-214.
32. National Association for Sport and Physical Education [NASPE]. (2004). Moving into the future: National standards for physical education (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.
33. Paris, S.G., & Lindauer, B.K. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
35. Renninger, K.A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Shen, B., Chen, A., Scrabis, K.A., & Tolley, H. (2003). Gender and interest-based motivation in learning dance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 396-410.
37. Shuell, T.J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-436.
38. Silverman, S., Subramaniam, P., & Woods, A.M. (1998). Task structures, student practice, and skill in physical education. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 298-306.
39. Solmon, M.A., & Lee, A.M. (1996). Entry characteristics, practice variables, and cognition: Student mediation of instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 136-150.
40. Solmon, M.A., & Lee, A.M. (1997). Development of an instrument to assess cognitive processes in physical education classes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 152-160.
41. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37-54.
42. Tritschler, K. (2000), Barrow & McGee'spractical measurement and assessment. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
43. Vincent, S.D., & Sidman, C.L. (2003). Determining measurement error in digital pedometers. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7(1), 19-24.