Encoding of three-dimensional surface slant in cat visual areas 17 and 18

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 2768-2786

  Sanada, Takahisa M ^a   Ohzawa, Izumi ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CAT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENERGY; EYE; HYPOTHESIS; MODEL; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; CATS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33646197066     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00955.2005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells. J Neurophysiol 82: 891-908, 1999a.
2. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information II. Complex cells. J Neurophysiol 82: 909-924, 1999b.
3. Barlow HB, Blakemore C, and Pettigrew JD. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol 193: 327-342, 1967.
4. Blakemore C. A new kind of stereoscopic vision. Vision Res 10: 1181-1199, 1970.
5. Blakemore C, Fiorentini A, and Maffei L. A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol 226: 725-749, 1972.
6. Bridge H and Cumming BG. Responses of macaque V1 neurons to binocular orientation differences. J Neurosci 21: 7293-7302, 2001.
7. Bridge H, Cumming BG, and Parker AJ. Modeling V1 neuronal responses to orientation disparity. Vis Neurosci 18: 879-891, 2001.
8. Burt P and Julesz B. A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. Science 208: 615-617, 1980.
9. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure. Nature 352: 156-159, 1991.
10. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. J Neurophysiol 69: 1091-1117, 1993a.
11. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. J Neurophysiol 69: 1118-1135, 1993b.
12. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Neuronal mechanisms underlying stereopsis: how do simple cells in the visual cortex encode binocular disparity? Perception 24: 3-31, 1995.
13. De Valois RL, Albrecht DG, and Thorell LG. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22: 545-559, 1982.
14. Efron B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982.
15. Efron B and Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
16. Ferster D. A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex. J Physiol 311: 623-655, 1981.
17. Fiorentini A and Maffei L. Binocular depth perception without geometrical cues. Vision Res 11: 1299-1305, 1971.
18. Halpern DL, Wilson HR, and Blake R. Stereopsis from interocular spatial frequency differences is not robust. Vision Res 36: 2263-2270, 1996.
19. Hammond P and Pomfrett CJ. Interocular mismatch in spatial frequency and directionality characteristics of striate cortical neurones. Exp Brain Res 85: 631-640, 1991.
20. Hinkle DA and Connor CE. Three-dimensional orientation tuning in macaque area V4. Nat Neurosci 5: 665-670, 2002.
21. Hubel DH and Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160: 106-154, 1962.
22. Hubel DH and Wiesel TN. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol 195: 215-243, 1968.
23. Hughes A. A useful table of reduced schematic eyes for vertebrates which includes computed longitudinal chromatic aberrations. Vision Res 19: 1273-1275, 1979.
24. Janssen P, Vogels R, and Orban GA. Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for disparity-defined three-dimensional shapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 8217-8222, 1999.
25. Janssen P, Vogels R, and Orban GA. Three-dimensional shape coding in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron 27: 385-397, 2000.
26. Jones JP and Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58: 1187-1211, 1987.
27. Jones JP, Stepnoski A, and Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58: 1212-1232, 1987.
28. LeVay S and Voigt T. Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 1: 395-414, 1988.
29. Li B, Peterson MR, and Freeman RD. Oblique effect: a neural basis in the visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 90: 204-217, 2003.
30. Liu Y, Vogels R, and Orban GA. Convergence of depth from texture and depth from disparity in macaque inferior temporal cortex. J Neurosci 24: 3795-3800, 2004.
31. Mata ML and Ringach DL. Spatial overlap of ON and OFF subregions and its relation to response modulation ratio in macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 93: 919-928, 2005.
32. Mechler F and Ringach DL. On the classification of simple and complex cells. Vision Res 42: 1017-1033, 2002.
33. Nelson JI, Kato H, and Bishop PO. Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 40: 260-283, 1977.
34. Nguyenkim JD and DeAngelis GC. Disparity-based coding of three-dimensional surface orientation by macaque middle temporal neurons. J Neurosci 23: 7117-7128, 2003.
35. Nikara T, Bishop PO, and Pettigrew JD. Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 6: 353-372, 1968.
36. Nishimoto S, Arai M, and Ohzawa I. Accuracy of subspace mapping of spatiotemporal frequency domain visual receptive fields. J Neurophysiol 93: 3524-3536, 2005.
37. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science 249: 1037-1041, 1990.
38. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 75: 1779-1805, 1996.
39. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 77: 2879-2909, 1997.
40. Ohzawa I and Freeman RD. The binocular organization of complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 56: 243-259, 1986a.
41. Ohzawa I and Freeman RD. The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 56: 221-242, 1986b.
42. Prazdny K. On the disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. Percept Psychophys 37: 81-83, 1985.
43. Qian N and Mikaelian S. Relationship between phase and energy methods for disparity computation. Neural Comput 12: 279-292, 2000.
44. Read JC and Cumming BG. Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 90: 2795-2817, 2003.
45. Ringach DL, Sapiro G, and Shapley R. A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons. Vision Res 37: 2455-2464, 1997.
46. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG, and Bonds AB. Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res 31: 1079-1086, 1991.
47. Taira M, Tsutsui KI, Jiang M, Yara K, and Sakata H. Parietal neurons represent surface orientation from the gradient of binocular disparity. J Neurophysiol 83: 3140-3146, 2000.
48. Tanabe S, Doi T, Umeda K, and Fujita I. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4. J Neurophysiol 94: 2683-2699, 2005.
49. Trivedi HP and Lloyd SA. The role of disparity gradient in stereo vision. Perception 14: 685-690, 1985.
50. Tyler CW and Sutter EE. Depth from spatial frequency difference: an old kind of stereopsis? Vision Res 19: 859-865, 1979.
51. Wilson HR. The significance of frequency gradients in binocular grating perception. Vision Res 16: 983-989, 1976.