Stereopsis from interocular spatial frequency differences is not robust

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 15, 1996, Pages 2263-2270

  Halpern, D Lynn ^a   Wilson, Hugh R ^b   Blake, Randolph ^c  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disparity; Spatial frequency; Stereopsis; Tilt

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION;

EID: 0030222138     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00293-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blakemore C. A new kind of stereoscopic vision. Vision Research. 10:1970;1181-1199.
2. Burt P., Julesz B. A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. Science. 208:1980;615-617.
3. DeValois R.L., Albrecht D.G., Thorell L.G. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research. 22:1982;545-559.
4. Ferrera V.P., Wilson H.R. Perceived speed of moving two-dimensional patterns. Vision Research. 31:1991;877-893.
5. Halpern D.L., Patterson R., Blake R. What causes stereoscopic tilt from spatial frequency disparity. Vision Research. 27:1987;1619-1629.
6. Levinson E., Blake R. Stereopsis by harmonic analysis. Vision Research. 19:1979;73-78.
7. Phillips G.C., Wilson H.R. Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1:1984;226-232.
8. Pollard S.B., Mayhew J.E.W., Frisby J.P. PMF: A stereo correspondence algorithm using a disparity gradient limit. Perception. 14:1985;449-470.
9. Rogers, B.J. & Bradshaw, M.F. (1994). Is dif-frequency a stimulus for stereoscopic slant? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35, (ARVO issue), 1316.
10. Schor C.M., Wood I. Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency. Vision Research. 23:1983;1649-1654.
11. Schor C., Wood I., Ogawa J. Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution. Vision Research. 24:1984;661-665.
12. Smallman H.S. Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis. Vision Research. 35:1995;1047-1060.
13. Tyler C.W. A stereoscopic view of visual processing streams. Vision Research. 30:1990;1877-1895.
14. Tyler C.W., Sutter E.E. Depth from spatial frequency difference: An old kind of stereopsis? Vision Research. 19:1979;859-865.
15. Wilson H.R. The significance of frequency gradients in binocular grating perception. Vision Research. 16:1976;983-989.
16. Wilson H.R., Blake R., Halpern D.L. Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 8:1991;229-236.
17. Wilson H.R., Blake R., Pokorny J. Limits of binocular fusion in the short wave sensitive ("blue") cones. Vision Research. 28:1988;555-562.
18. Wilson H.R., McFarlane D.K., Phillips G.C. Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking. Vision Research. 23:1983;873-882.
19. Yang Y., Blake R. Spatial frequency tuning of human stereopsis. Vision Research. 31:1991;1177-1189.