Prenatal exposure to temporal and spatial stimulus properties affects postnatal responsiveness to spatial contiguity in bobwhite quail chicks

Developmental Psychobiology

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 233-242

  Jaime, Mark ^a   Lickliter, Robert ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intersensory perception; Perceptual development; Prenatal sensory experience; Spatial contiguity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; HATCHING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; QUAIL; STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COLINUS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA; COLINUS VIRGINIANUS; PHASIANIDAE;

EID: 33645974850     PISSN: 00121630     EISSN: 10982302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dev.20131     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bahrick, L. E., & Lickliter, R. (1998, July). Spatial incongruity interferes with intermodal learning in 3-month-old infants. Presented at the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, Orleans, France.
2. Calvert, G., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Columbus, R. F., Sleigh, M. J., Lickliter, R., & Lewkowicz, D. J. (1998). Unimodal sensory experience interferes with responsiveness to the spatial contiguity of multimodal maternal cues in bobwhite quail. Infant Behavior & Development, 21, 397-409.
4. Fenwick, K. D., & Morrongiello, B. A. (1998). Spatial colocation and infants' learning of auditory-visual associations. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 745-760.
5. Field, J. (1987). The development of auditory-visual localization in infancy. In B. E. McKenzie & R. H. Day (Eds.), Perceptual development in early infancy (pp. 175-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing nature-nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Gottlieb, G., Tomlinson, W. T., & Radell, P. L. (1989). Developmental intersensory interference: Premature visual experience suppresses auditory learning in ducklings. Infant Behavior and Development, 12, 1-12.
10. Heaton, M. B., Miller, D. B., & Goodwin, D. G. (1978). Species-specific auditory discrimination in bobwhite quail neonates. Developmental Psychobiology, 11, 13-21.
11. Honeycutt, H., & Lickliter, R. (2001). Order-dependent timing of unimodal and multimodal stimulation affects prenatal auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychobiology, 37, 1-10.
12. Honeycutt H., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Prenatal experiences and postnatal preferences: Evidence for attentional-bias in bobwhite quail embryos (colinus virginianus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 270-276.
13. Lawson, K. R. (1980). Spatial and temporal congruity and auditory-visual integration in infants. Developmental Psychology, 16, 185-192.
14. Lewkowicz, D. J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic system/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 281-308.
15. Lewkowicz, D. J., & Lickliter, R. (1994). Development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ.: L. Erlbaum.
16. Lickliter, R. (1994). Prenatal visual experience alters postnatal sensory dominance in bobwhite quail chicks. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 185-193.
17. Lickliter, R. (1995). Embryonic sensory experience and intersensory development in precocial birds. In J. P. Lecanuet, N. A. Krasnegor, W. Fifer, & W. P. Smotherman (Eds.), Fetal Development: A Psychobiological Perspective (pp. 281-294). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
18. Lickliter, R. (2000). The role of sensory stimulation in perinatal development: Insights from comparative research for the care of the high-risk infant. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 21, 437-447.
19. Lickliter, R. (2005). Prenatal sensory ecology and experience: Implications for perceptual and behavioral development in precocial birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 35, pp. 235-274.
20. Lickliter, R. & Bahrick, L. E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: Advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260-280.
21. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates prenatal perceptual learning in bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) embryos. Developmental Psychology, 38, 15-23.
22. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (2004). Intersensory redundancy enhances memory in bobwhite quail embryos. Infancy, 5, 253-269.
23. Lickliter, R., & Hellewell, T. B. (1992). Contextual determinants of auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos and hatchlings. Developmental Psychobiology, 25, 17-24.
24. Lickliter, R., Lewkowicz, D. J. (1995). Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: Attenuated prenatal sensory stimulation affects postnatal auditory and visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Developmental Psychobiology, 31, 609-618.
25. Lickliter, R., Lewkowicz, D. J., & Columbus, R. F. (1996). Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: The role of spatial contiguity in bobwhite quail chicks' responsiveness to multimodal maternal cues. Developmental Psychobiology, 29, 403-416.
26. Lickliter, R., & Virkar, P. (1989). Intersensory functioning in bobwhite quail chicks: Early sensory dominance. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 651-667.
27. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1977). Bimodal perception in infancy: Response to auditory-visual incongruity. Child Development, 48, 820-827.
28. Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986). Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56, 640-662.
29. Morrongiello, B. A. (1994). Effects of colocation on auditory-visual interactions and cross-modal perception in infants. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 235-263). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
30. Morrongiello, B. A., Fenwick, K. D., & Nutley, T. (1998). Developmental changes in associations between auditory-visual events. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 613-626.
31. Radell, P. L., & Gottlieb, G. (1992). Developmental intersensory interference: Augmented prenatal sensory experience interferes with auditory learning in duck embryos. Developmental Psychology, 28, 795-803.
32. Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Stein, B. E., Meredith, M. A., Huneycutt, W. S., & McDade, L. (1989). Behavioral indices of multisensory integration: Orientation to visual cues is affected by auditory stimuli. Journal of Comparative Neuroscience, 1, 12-24.
34. Stein, B. E., Meredith, M. A., & Wallace, M. T. (1993). Nonvisual responses of visually-responsive neurons. In T. P. Hicks, S. Molotchnikoff, & T. Ono (Eds.), Progress in brain research: The visually responsive neurons: From basic neurophysiology to behavior (pp. 79-90). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Thorne, B. M., & Giesen, J. M. (2000). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
36. Turkewitz, G., & Kenny, P. A. (1982). Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: A preliminary theoretical statement. Developmental Psychobiology, 15, 357-368.