Prenatal experience and postnatal perceptual preferences: Evidence for attentional-bias in bobwhite quail embryos (Colinus virginianus)

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 270-276

  Honeycutt, Hunter ^b   Lickliter, Robert ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; COLINUS; DECISION MAKING; EMBRYO; FEMALE; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLINUS; EMBRYO; FEMALE; LEARNING; PREGNANCY; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 85047672017     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.3.270     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Columbus, R. F., & Lickliter, R. (1998). Modified sensory features of social stimulation alter the perceptual responsiveness of bobwhite quail chicks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 161-169.
2. Gottlieb, G. (1988). Development of species identification in ducklings: XV. Individual auditory recognition. Developmental Psychobiology, 21, 509-522.
3. Gottlieb, G. (1991). Social induction of malleability in ducklings. Animal Behaviour, 41, 953-962.
4. Gottlieb, G. (1993). Social induction of malleability in ducklings: Sensory basis and psychological mechanism. Animal Behaviour, 45, 707-719.
5. Gottlieb, G., Tomlinson, W. T., & Radell, P. L. (1989). Developmental intersensory interference: Premature visual experience suppresses auditory learning in ducklings. Infant Behavior and Development, 12, 1-12.
6. Heaton, M. B., Miller, D. B., & Goodwin, D. G. (1978). Species-specific auditory discrimination in bobwhite quail neonates. Developmental Psychobiology, 11, 13-21.
7. Honeycutt, H., & Lickliter, R. (2001). Order dependent timing of unimodal and multimodal stimulation affects prenatal auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychobiology, 38, 1-10.
8. Kenny, P., & Turkewitz, G. (1986). Effects of unusually early visual stimulation on the development of homing behavior in the rat pup. Developmental Psychobiology, 19, 57-66.
9. Kraebel, K. S., & Spear, N. E. (2000). Infant rats are more likely than adolescents to orient differently to amodal (intensity-based) features of single-element and compound stimuli. Developmental Psychobiology, 36, 49-66.
10. Kucharski, D., & Spear, N. E. (1984). Conditioning of aversion to an odor paired with peripheral shock in the developing rat. Developmental Psychobiology, 17, 465-479.
11. Kucharski, D., & Spear, N. E. (1985). Potentiation and overshadowing in preweanling and adult rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 15-34.
12. Lewkowicz, D. J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 281-308.
13. Lewkowicz, D. J., & Lickliter, R. (1994). The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Lickliter, R. (1993). Timing and the development of perinatal perceptual organization. In G. Turkewitz & D. A. Devenny (Eds.), Developmental time and timing (pp. 105-123). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Lickliter, R. (2000). The role of sensory stimulation in perinatal development: Insights from comparative research for the care of the high-risk infant. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 21, 437-447.
16. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: Advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260-280.
17. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates prenatal perceptual learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychology, 38, 15-23.
18. Lickliter, R., Dyer, A., & McBride, T. (1993). Perceptual consequences of early social experience in precocial birds. Behavioral Processes, 30, 185-200.
19. Lickliter, R., & Hellewell, T. B. (1992). Contextual determinants of auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos and hatchlings. Developmental Psychobiology, 25, 17-24.
20. Lickliter, R., & Lewkowicz, D. J. (1995). Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: Attenuated prenatal sensory stimulation affects postnatal auditory and visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Developmental Psychology, 31, 609-618.
21. McBride, T., & Lickliter, R. (1993). Social experience with siblings fosters species-specific responsiveness to maternal cues in bobwhite quail chicks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 320-327.
22. Mellon, R. C., Kraemer, P. J., & Spear, N. E. (1991). Development of intersensory function: Age-related differences in stimulus selection of multimodal compounds in rats as revealed by Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 448-464.
23. Radell, P. L., & Gottlieb, G. (1992). Developmental intersensory interference: Augmented prenatal sensory experience interferes with auditory learning in duck embryos. Developmental Psychology, 28, 795-803.
24. Schneirla, T. C. (1959). An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 7, pp. 1 - 42). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
25. Spear, N. E., Kraemer, P. J., Molina, J. C., & Smoller, D. (1988). Developmental change in learning and memory: Infantile disposition for "unitization." In J. Delacour & J. C. S. Levy (Eds.), Systems with learning and memory abilities (pp. 27-52). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
26. Spear, N. E., & Kucharski, D. (1984). Ontogenetic differences in stimulus selection during conditioning. In R. Kail & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on the development of memory (pp. 227-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Spear, N. E., & McKinzie, D. L. (1994). Intersensory integration in the infant rat. In D. J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 133-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Spear, N. E., & Molina, J. C. (1987). The role of sensory modality in the ontogeny of stimulus selection. In N. Krasnegor, E. M. Blass, & W. P. Smotherman (Eds.), Perinatal development: A psychobiological perspective (pp. 83-113). New York: Academic Press.
29. Stokes, A. W. (1967). Behavior of the bobwhite (Colinus virginianus). Auk, 84, 1-33.