The role of sensory stimulation in perinatal development: Insights from comparative research for care of the high-risk infant

Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 437-447

  Lickliter, Robert ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Perceptual development; Perinatal stimulation; Sensory experience

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; INFANT; NEWBORN; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0034543142     PISSN: 0196206X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004703-200012000-00007     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Avery GB, Glass P: The gentle nursery: Developmental intervention in the NICU. J Perinatol 9:204-206, 1989
2. Burns K, Cunningham N, White-Traut RC, Silvestri JM, Nelson MN: Modification of an infant stimulation protocol based on physiologic and behavioral responses. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 23:581-589, 1994
3. Field TM: Supplemental stimulation of preterm neonates. Early Hum Dev 4:301-314, 1980
4. Korner AF: Infant stimulation: Issues of theory and research. Clin Perinatol 17:173-184, 1990
5. Parmalee AH: Sensory stimulation in the nursery: How much and when? J Dev Behav Pediatr 6:242-243, 1985
6. Thoman EB: Obligation and option in the premature nursery. Dev Rev 13:1-30, 1993
7. Gottlieb G: Ontogenesis of sensory function in birds and mammals, in Tobach E, Aronson L, Shaw E (eds): The Biopsychology of Development. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1971, pp 67-128
8. Gottlieb G: Social induction of malleability in ducklings: Sensory basis and psychological mechanism. Anim Behav 45:707-719, 1993
9. Lickliter R, Lewkowicz DJ: Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: Attenuated prenatal sensory stimulation affects postnatal auditory and visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychol 31:609-618, 1995
10. McBride T, Lickliter R: Social experience with siblings fosters species-specific responsiveness to maternal cues in bobwhite quail chicks. J Comp Psychol 107:320-327, 1993
11. McBride T, Lickliter R: Specific postnatal auditory stimulation interferes with species-typical visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychobiol 27:169-183, 1994
12. Radell PL, Gottlieb G: Developmental intersensory interference: Augmented prenatal sensory experience interferes with auditory learning in duck embryos. Dev Psychol 28:795-803, 1992
13. Sleigh MJ, Lickliter R: Type and amount of prenatal stimulation alters perceptual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Infant Behav Dev 19:325-338, 1996
14. Gottlieb G: Experiential canalization of behavioral development: Theory. Dev Psychol 27:4-13, 1991
15. Hofer MA: Early social relationships: A psychobiologist's view. Child Dev 58:633-647, 1987
16. Robinson SR, Smotherman WP: The emergence of behavioral regulation during fetal development. Ann NY Acad Sci 662:53-83, 1992
17. Smotherman WP, Robinson SR: Tracing developmental trajectories into the prenatal period, in Lecanuet JP, Fifer WP, Krasnegor NA, Smotherman WP (eds): Fetal Development: A Psychobiological Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1995, pp 15-32
18. Gottlieb G: Prenatal behavior of birds. Q Rev Biol 43:148-174, 1968
19. Alberts JR: Sensory-perceptual development in the Norway rat: A view towards comparative studies, in Kail R, Spear NE (eds): Comparative Perspectives on Memory Development. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1984, pp 65-101
20. Spear NE: Ecologically determined dispositions control the ontogeny of learning and memory, in Kail R, Spear NE (eds): Comparative Perspective on Memory Development. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1984, pp 325-358
21. Tees RC: Perceptual development in mammals, in Gottlieb G (ed): Neural and Behavioral Specificity. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1976, pp 281-326
22. Turkewitz G, Kenny PA: Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: A preliminary theoretical statement. Dev Psychobiol 15:357-368, 1982
23. Turkewitz G, Kenny PA: The role of developmental limitations of sensory input on sensory/perceptual organization. J Dev Behav Pediatr 6:302-306, 1985
24. Turkewitz G, Mellon RC: Dynamic organization of intersensory function. Can J Psychol 43:286-301, 1989
25. Carlsen RM, Lickliter R: Augmented prenatal tactile and vestibular stimulation alters postnatal auditory and visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychobiol 35:215-225, 1999
26. Foreman N, Altaha M: The development of exploration and spontaneous alteration in hooded rat pups: Effects of unusually early eyelid opening. Dev Psychobiol 24:521-537, 1991
27. Gottlieb G, Tomlinson WT, Radell PL: Developmental intersensory interference: Premature visual experience suppresses auditory learning in ducklings. Infant Behav Dev 12:1-12, 1989
28. Kenny P, Turkewitz G: Effects of unusually early visual stimulation on the development of homing behavior in the rat pup. Dev Psychobiol 19:57-66, 1986
29. Lickliter R: Premature visual stimulation accelerates intersensory functioning in bobwhite quail neonates. Dev Psychobiol 23:15-27, 1990
30. Lickliter R: Premature visual experience facilitates visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail neonates. Infant Behav Dev 13:487-496, 1990
31. Lickliter R: Timing and the development of perinatal perceptual organization, in Turkewitz G, Devenny DA (eds): Developmental Time and Timing. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1993, pp 105-123
32. Lickliter R, Banker H: Prenatal components of intersensory development in precocial birds, in Lewkowicz DJ, Lickliter R (eds): The Development of Intersensory Perception: Comparative Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1994, pp 59-80
33. Spear NE, McKinzie DL: Intersensory integration in the infant rat, in Lewkowicz DJ, Lickliter R (eds): The Development of Intersensory Perception: Comparative Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1994, pp 133-161
34. Burnstine TH, Greenough WT, Tees RC: Intermodal compensation following damage or deprivation, in Almli CR, Finger S (eds): The Behavioral Biopsychology of Early Brain Damage. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1984, pp 3-34
35. Riesen AH, Zilbert DE: Behavioral consequences of variations in early sensory development, in Riesen AH (ed): The Developmental Neuropsychology of Sensory Deprivation. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1975, pp 211-252
36. Tees RC: Experience and visual development: Behavioral evidence, in Greenough WT, Juraska JM (eds): Developmental Neuropsychobiology. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1986, pp 317-361
37. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160:106-154, 1962
38. Banker H, Lickliter R: Effects of early or delayed visual experience on perceptual development in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychobiol 26:155-170, 1993
39. Lickliter R: Prenatal visual experience alters postnatal sensory dominance hierarchy in bobwhite quail chicks. Infant Behav Dev 17:185-193, 1994
40. Sleigh MJ, Lickliter R: Augmented prenatal visual stimulation alters postnatal auditory and visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychobiol 28:353-366, 1995
41. Sleigh MJ, Lickliter R: Augmented prenatal auditory stimulation alters postnatal perception, arousal, and survival in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychobiol 30:201-212, 1997
42. Lickliter R, Hellewell TB : Contextual determinants of auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos and hatchlings. Dev Psychobiol 25:17-24, 1992
43. Lickliter R, Stoumbos J: Enhanced prenatal auditory experience facilitates postnatal visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. J Comp Psychol 105:89-94, 1991
44. Turkewitz G: Sources of order for intersensory functioning, in Lewkowicz DJ, Lickliter R (eds): The Development of Intersensory Perception: Comparative Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1994, pp 3-17
45. Katz LC, Shatz CJ: Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 274:1133-1138, 1996
46. Johnston TD, Gottlieb G: Development of visual species identification in ducklings: What is the role of imprinting? Anim Behav 29:1082-1099, 1981
47. Lewkowicz DJ: Sensory dominance in infants: 1. Six-month-old infants' response to auditory-visual compounds. Dev Psychol 24:155-171, 1988
48. Lickliter R, Virkar P: Intersensory functioning in bobwhite quail chicks: Early sensory dominance. Dev Psychobiol 22:651-667, 1989
49. Mendelson MJ, Haith MM: The relation between audition and vision in the human newborn. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 41:1-72, 1976
50. Tees RC, Symons LA: Intersensory coordination and the effect of early sensory deprivation. Dev Psychobiol 23:497-507, 1987
51. Mistretta CM, Bradley RM: Effects of early sensory experience on brain and behavioral development, in Gottlieb G (ed): Early Influences. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1978, pp 215-247
52. Als H: The preterm infant: A model for the study of fetal brain expectation, in Lecanuet JP, Fifer WF, Krasnegor NA, Smotherman WP (eds): Fetal Development: A Psychobiological Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1995, pp 439-471
53. Foreman N, Fielder A, Price D, Bowler V: Tonic and phasic orientation in fullterm and preterm infants. J Exp Child Psychol 51:407-422, 1991
54. Marshall-Baker A, Lickliter R, Cooper RP: Long-term exposure to a visual stimulus may promote behavioral organization in preterm infants. J Perinatol Neonatal Nurs 12:50-62, 1998
55. Mueller CR: Multidisciplinary research of multimodal stimulation of premature infants: An integrated review of the literature. Matern Child Nurs J 24:18-31, 1996
56. Gray L: Activity level and auditory responsiveness in neonatal chickens. Dev Psychobiol 23:297-308, 1990
57. Turkewitz G, Lewkowicz DJ, Gardner JM: Determinants of infant perception, in Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Beer C, Busnel MC: Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol 13. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1983, pp 39-62
58. Lewkowicz DJ, Turkewitz G: Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory-visual intensity matching. Dev Psychol 16:597-607, 1980
59. Lewkowicz DJ, Turkewitz G: Intersensory interaction in newborns: Modification of visual preferences following exposure to sound. Child Dev 52:827-832, 1981
60. Gardner JM, Karmel BZ: Development of arousal-modulated visual preferences in early infancy. Dev Psychol 31:473-482, 1995
61. Gardner JM, Karmel BZ, Magnano CL: Arousal/visual preference interactions in high-risk neonates: Dev Psychol 28:821-830, 1992
62. Sleigh MJ, Columbus RF, Lickliter R: Type of prenatal sensory experience affects prenatal auditory learning in bobwhite quail. J Comp Psychol 110:233-242, 1996
63. Schneirla TC: An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach/withdrawal, in Jones, M (ed): Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol 7. Lincoln, NE, University of Nebraska Press, 1959, pp 1-42
64. Schneirla TC: Aspects of stimulation and organization in approach/withdrawal processes underlying vertebrate behavioral development, in Lehrman DS, Hinde RA, Shaw E (eds): Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol 1. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1965, pp 2-74
65. Sleigh MJ, Columbus RF, Lickliter R: Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: Postnatal experience with multimodal maternal cues affects intersensory responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychol 34:215-223, 1998
66. Columbus RF, Sleigh MJ, Lickliter R, Lewkowicz DJ: Unimodal sensory experience interferes with responsiveness to the spatial contiguity of multimodal maternal cues in bobwhite quail chicks. Infant Behav Dev 21:397-409, 1998
67. Bailey ED, Ralph KM: The effects of embryonic exposure to pheasant vocalizations in later call identification by chicks. Can J Zool 53:1028-1034, 1975
68. DeCasper AJ, Fifer WF: Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mother's voices. Science 208:1174-1176, 1980
69. Fait B: Development of responsiveness to the individual maternal "clucking" by domestic chicks. Behav Proc 6:303-317, 1981
70. Fifer WF, Moon CM: The effects of fetal experience with sound, in Lecanuet JP, Fifer WF, Krasnegor NA, Smotherman WP (eds): Fetal Development: A Psychobiological Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1995, pp 351-366
71. Gottlieb G: Development of species identification in ducklings: XV. Individual auditory recognition. Dev Psychobiol 21:509-522, 1988
72. Bahrick LE, Lickliter R: Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Dev Psychol 36:190-201, 2000
73. Withington-Wray DJ, Binns KE, Keating MJ: The maturation of the superior collicular map of auditory space in the guinea pig is disrupted by developmental visual deprivation. Eur J Neurosci 2:682-692, 1990
74. Knudsen EI, Brainard MS: Creating a unified representation of visual and auditory space in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 18:19-43, 1995
75. Lariviere NA, Spear NE: Early pavlovian conditioning impairs later pavlovian conditioning. Dev Psychobiol 29:613-635, 1996
76. Columbus RF, Lickliter R: Modified sensory features of social stimulation alter the perceptual responsiveness of bobwhite quail chicks. J Comp Psychol 112:161-169, 1998
77. Turkewitz G, Devenny DA: Developmental Time and Timing. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1995
78. Lickliter R, Lewkowicz DJ, Columbus RF: Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: The role of spatial contiguity in bobwhite quail chicks' responsiveness to maternal cues. Dev Psychobiol 29:403-416, 1996
79. Sleigh MJ, Lickliter R: Timing of the presentation of prenatal auditory stimulation affects postnatal perceptual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. J Comp Psychol 112:153-160, 1998
80. Lawson K, Daum C, Turkewitz G: Environmental characteristics of a neonatal intensive care unit. Child Dev 48:1633-1639, 1977
81. Philbin MK, Balweg DD, Gray L: The effect of an intensive care unit sound environment on the development of habituation in healthy avian neonates. Dev Psychobiol 27:11-21, 1994
82. Kisilevsky BS, Low JA: Human fetal behavior: 100 years of study. Dev Rev 18:1-29, 1998
83. Lecanuet JP, Fifer WF, Krasnegor NA, Smotherman WP: Fetal Development: A Psychobiological Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1995
84. Lecanuet JP, Schaal B: Fetal sensory competencies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 68:1-23, 1996.