Compressive shear bond strength of core buildup materials

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 183-189

  Görücü, Jale ^a   Saygili, Gülbin ^a   Özgünaltay, Gül ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; DENTAL ALLOY; POLYURETHAN; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMAN; INJURY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL AMALGAM; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; POLYURETHANES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 33645958585     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: 19453388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lagouvardos P, Sourai P, Douvitsas G. Coronal fracture in posterior teeth. Oper Dent 1989;14(1):29-32.
2. Burke FJT, Shaglouf AG, Combe EC, Wilson WHF. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extra coronal preparation. Oper Dent 2000;25:388-394.
3. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Pilot study of the cyclic fatigue characteristics of five endodontic posts with four core materials. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:83-92.
4. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:624-628.
5. Gonzales AM, Borras VA, Font AF, Otaolaurruchi ES, Rueda CL. Response of three types of cast posts and cores to static loading. Quintessence Int 2001;32:552-560.
6. Taleghami M, Leinfielder KF. Evaluation of a new glass-ionomer cement with silver as a core build-up under a cast restoration. Quintessence Int 1988;19:19-24.
7. Kane JJ, Burgess JO. Modification of the resistance form of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:470-474.
8. Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Retention between a serrated steel dowel and different core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:480-482.
9. Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effect of eugenol and eugenol cements on cured composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:211-215.
10. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swıft Jr EJ. Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:234-249.
11. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16:33-40.
12. Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2001;17:253-259.
13. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials (FDI Commission Project). Int Dent J 1998;48:3-16.
14. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA, Denghy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resinbased composites: A comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1610-1615.
15. Şahmalı S, Saygılı G. Compressive shear strength of core materials and restoring techniques. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:277-283.
16. Abe Y, Lambrechts P, Inoue S, et al. Dynamic elastic modulus of packable composites. Dent Mater 2001;17:520-525.
17. Nash WR, Lowe RA, Leinfelder K. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1099-1104.
18. Liebenberg VH. The axial bevel technique:A new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations: Pushing the envelope. Quintessence Int 2000;31:231-239.
19. Ramfjörd SR, Ash MM. Occlusion, ed 2. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1971.
20. Sakaguchi RL, Sasık CT, Bunczak MA, Douglas WH. Strain gauge method for measuring polymerization contraction of composite restoratives. J Dent 1991;19:312-316.
21. Sakaguchi RL, Peters MC, Nelson SR, Douglas WH, Poort HW. Effects of polymerization contraction of composite restoratives. J Dent 1992;20:178-182.
22. Abdul Nour C, Fortin D, Prevost A. Determination of packability index of composite resins [abstract 2453]. J Dent Res 2000;79(special issue):450.
23. Tantbirojn D, Trom M, Douglas WH. Measuring of band displacement: A methodology to determine composite packability [abstract 2460]. J Dent Res 2000;79(special issue):451.
24. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherıckx K, et al. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? Dent Mater 2001;17:533-541.
25. Ruddel DE, Thompson JY, Stamatiades PJ, Ward JC, Bayne SC, Shellard ER. Mechanical properties and wear behaviour of condensable composites [abstract 407]. J Dent Res 1999;78(special issue):156.
26. MacGregor KM, Cobb DS, Vargas MA. Physical properties of condensable versus conventional composites [abstract 411]. J Dent Res 1999;78(special issue):157.
27. BarkmeierWW, Wilwerding TM, Latta MA, Blake SM. In vitro wear assessment of highdensity composite resins [abstract 2737]. J Dent Res 2000;78(special issue):448.
28. Pearson JF, Bouschlicher MR, Boyer DB. Polymerization shrinkage forces of condensable composites [abstract 68]. J Dent Res 1999;78(special issue):114.
29. Chen HY, Kunzelmann K-H, Manhart J, Hickel R. Setting stress of light cured packable composite resins [abstract 822]. J Dent Res 2000;79:246.