Response of three types of cast posts and cores to static loading

Quintessence International

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 552-560

  Martínez González, Amparo ^a   Amigó Borrás, Vicente ^b   Fons Font, Antonio ^a   Selva Otaolaurruchi, Eduardo ^a   Labaig Rueda, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acetalic resin; Cast posts and cores; Ceramic cast posts and cores

Indexed keywords

ACETAL DERIVATIVE; ACETALIC RESIN, ACETAL DENTAL; ACETALIC RESIN, ACETAL-DENTAL; ALUMINUM SILICATE; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; POLYACETAL; POLYMER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; ELASTICITY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

ACETALS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CROWNS; CUSPID; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMERS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH FRACTURES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0035404023     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Tylman SD. Theory and Practice of Crown and Fixed Partial Prosthodontics, ed 6. St Louis: Mosby, 1970.
2. Trabert KC, Caput AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture - A comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978;4:341-345.
3. Geller W, Kwiatkowski SJ. The Willi's glass crown: A new solution in the dark and shadowed zones of esthetic porcelain restorations. Quintessence Dent Technol 1987;11:233-242.
4. Villa Vigil M, Zapico del Bustio E, Cueto M, Peña JM, Fernández A, Fernández MP. Ceramic covered core. Clinical aspects of a new proceeding in esthetic restorations [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Odontoestomatol 1994;6:271-278.
5. Mutobe Y, Maruyama T, Kataoka S. In harmony with nature (I). Esthetic restoration of a nonvital tooth using the all-ceramic crown IPS-Empress [in Spanish]. Quintessence Téchnica 1996;7:240-254.
6. Martínez A, Solá MF, Casas J, Fons A. Indications and advantages of the ceramic-covered core. In relation of a case [in Spanish]. Quintessence Téchnica 1997;10: 220-225.
7. Pérez JF, Howe D, Svare C. Cast gold post and core and pin-retained composite resin bases: A comparative study in strength. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:642-644.
8. Groten M, Pröbster L. The influence of different cementation modes on the fracture resistance of feldspathic ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:169-177.
9. Libman W, Nicholls J. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:155-161.
10. Isidor F, Ödman P, Brøndum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:131-136.
11. Barkhordar RA, Radke R, Abbasi J. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:676-678.
12. Ramfjörd SR, Ash MM. Occlusion, ed 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1971.
13. De Boever JA, McCall WD, Holden S, Ash MM. Functional occlusal forces: An investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:326-333.
14. Phillips RW. Physical properties of dental materials. In: Skinner (ed). The Science of Dental Materials [in Spanish]. Madrid: McGraw-Hill, 1991:29-48.
15. Derrien G, Jardel V. Evaluation of physical properties of two acetalic resins [in French]. Cahiers Prothese 1996; 95:19-25.
16. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
17. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:599-609.
18. Helkimo E, Carlsson G, Cornell Y. Bite force in patients with functional disturbances of the masticatory system. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2:397-401.
19. Ramfjörd SJ, Ash MM. Periodontology and Periodontics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1979.
20. Loney RW, Moulding MB, Ritsco RG. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8: 247-251.
21. Padrós E, Padrós JL, Creus M, Monterrubio M, Padrós E, Serrat AM. The main advantages of carbon fiber posts [in Spanish]. Rev Acta Odontoestomatol Esp 1996;56(3): 55-58.
22. Mendoza A, Domínguez A, Solano E. In vitro study of the static loading resistance in nonvital and restored teeth [in Spanish]. Quintessence (Spanish Edition) 1994;7:614-621.
23. Chan RW, Bryant RW. Post-core foundations for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48: 401-406.
24. Gelfand M, Goldman M, Sunderman E. Effect of complete veneer crowns on the compressive strength of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52: 635-638.
25. Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:177-181.
26. Nayyar A, McDonald TR, Turner F, Koth DL. Strength of premolar corono-radicular build-ups restored with cast crowns. J Dent Res 1982;61:186.
27. Shillingburg HT, Kessler JC. Restoration of the Endodontically Treated Tooth. Chicago: Quintessence, 1982:13-45.
28. Lovdahl PE, Nicholls JI. Pin retained amalgam cores vs cast-gold dowel-cores. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:507-514.
29. Johnson JK, Sakumura JS. Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:645-649.
30. Henry PJ. Photoelastic analysis of post and core restorations. Aust Dent J 1977;22:157-165.
31. Hunter AJ, Feiglein B, Williams JF. Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:166-172.
32. Cantatore G, Corigliano M, Malagnino V. Acetalic-resin post and core. Marginal fitting and luting [in Italian]. Dent Cadmos 1992;12:42-51.
33. González-López S, Navajas S. Comparative study of shear strength resistance of three types of manufactured posts [in Spanish]. Arch Odontoestomatol 1987;3:305-311.
34. Reel DC, Hinton T, Riggs G, Mitchell RJ. Effect of cementation method on the retention of anatomic cast post and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:162-165.
35. Kwiatkowski S, Geller W. A preliminary consideration of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:51-56.
36. Saupe W, Gluskin A, Radke RA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996;27:483-491.
37. Simon M, Paffrath J. New aspects of all-ceramic restorations and the restoration of nonvital teeth [in Spanish]. Quintessence (Spanish Edition) 1996;9:544-555.
38. Cañadas D, Castro J, Jiménez E. Disadvantages of esthetic acetalic-resin clasps in removable partial prosthesis [in Spanish]. Quintessence (Spanish Edition) 1995;8:15-19.