Factors Affecting Male Song Evolution in Drosophila montana

Current Topics in Developmental Biology

Volumn 67, Issue , 2005, Pages 225-250

  Hoikkala, Anneli ^a   Klappert, Kirsten ^b   Mazzi, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645920654     PISSN: 00702153     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)67007-X     Document Type: Chapter

References (106)

1. Alatalo R.V., Lundberg A., and Glynn C. Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323 (1986) 152-153
2. Andersson M. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299 (1982) 818-820
3. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56 (2002) 936-947
4. Aspi J. Female mate choice and mating system among boreal Drosophila virilis group species. "Acta Universitatis Ouluensis A." (1992), University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
5. Aspi J. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana. Heredity 84 (2000) 273-282
6. Aspi J., and Hoikkala A. Laboratory and natural heritabilities of male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana and D. littoralis. Heredity 70 (1993) 400-406
7. Aspi J., and Hoikkala A. Male mating success and survival in the field with respect to size and courtship song characters in Drosophila littoralis and D. montana (Diptera, Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 8 (1995) 67-87
8. Aspi J., Lumme J., Hoikkala A., and Heikkinen E. Reproductive ecology of the boreal riparian guild of Drosophila. Ecography 16 (1993) 65-72
9. Bailey W.J. "Acoustic behavior of insects: An evolutionary perspective." (1991), Chapman and Hall, London, UK
10. Bakker T.C.M. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363 (1993) 255-257
11. Bakker T.C.M., and Pomiankowski A. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 8 (1995) 129-171
12. Basolo A.L. Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science 250 (1990) 808-810
13. Butlin R.K., and Ritchie M.G. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems-What is the evidence?. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 37 (1989) 237-246
14. Campesan S., Dubrova Y., Hall J.C., and Kyriacou C.P. The nonA gene in Drosophila conveys species-specific behavioral characteristics. Genetics 158 (2001) 1535-1543
15. Chapman T., Liddle L.F., Kalb J.M., Wolfner M.F., and Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373 (1995) 241-244
16. Cowling D.E., and Burnet B. Courtship songs and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim. Behav. 29 (1981) 924-935
17. Coyne J.A., Crittenden A.P., and Mah K. Genetics of pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265 (1994) 1461-1464
18. Darwin C. "The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex." (1871), John Murray, London, UK
19. Dobzhansky T. "Genetics and the Origin of Species." (1951), Columbia University Press, New York
20. Doi M., Matsuda M., Tomaru M., Matsubayashi H., and Oguma Y. A locus for female discrimination behavior causing sexual isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 98 (2001) 6714-6719
21. Ewing A.W. The evolution of courtship songs in Drosophila. Rev. Comp. Anim. 4 (1970) 3-8
22. Ewing A.W., and Miyan J.A. Sexual selection, sexual isolation, and the evolution of song in the Drosophila repleta group of species. Anim. Behav. 34 (1986) 421-429
23. Fisher R.A. "The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection." (1930), Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK
24. Gerhardt H.C. Temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor. Science 199 (1978) 992-994
25. Gleason J.M., and Ritchie M.G. Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTL?. Genetics 166 (2004) 1303-1311
26. Gleason J.M., Nuzhdin S.V., and Ritchie M.G. Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 89 (2002) 1-6
27. Gubenko I.S., and Evgenev M.B. Cytological and linkage maps of Drosophila virilis chromosomes. Genetica 65 (1984) 127-139
28. Hamilton W.D., and Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites?. Science 218 (1982) 384-387
29. Hankison S.J., and Morris M.R. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: Female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behav. Ecol. 14 (2003) 282-287
30. Hedrick A.V., and Dill L.M. Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46 (1993) 193-196
31. Heisler I.L., Andersson M.B., Arnold S.J., Boake C.R., Borgia G., Hausfater G., Kirkpatrick M., Lande R., Maynard Smith J., O'Donald P., Thornhill A.R., and Weissing F.J. The evolution of mating preferences in sexually selected traits: Group report. In: Bradbury J.W., and Andersson M.B. (Eds). "Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives" (1987), John Wiley, Chichester, UK 96-118
32. Henderson N.R., and Lambert D.M. No significant deviation from random mating of worldwide populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 300 (1982) 437-440
33. Hoikkala A. Genetic variation in the male courtship sound of Drosophila littoralis. Behav. Genet. 15 (1985) 135-142
34. Hoikkala A. The importance of different courtship stimuli in the mating behavior of European species of the Drosophila virilis group. Ann. Zool. Fennici 25 (1988) 257-263
35. Hoikkala A., and Aspi J. Criteria of female mate choice in Drosophila littoralis, D. montana, and D. ezoana. Evolution 47 (1993) 768-777
36. Hoikkala A., and Isoherranen E. Variation and repeatability of courtship song characters among wild-caught and laboratory-reared Drosophila montana and D. littoralis males (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 10 (1997) 193-202
37. Hoikkala A., and Lumme J. The genetic basis of evolution of male courtship sounds in the Drosophila virilis group. Evolution 4 (1987) 827-845
38. Hoikkala A., and Suvanto L. Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male mating success in Drosophila montana. J. Insect Behav. 12 (1999) 599-609
39. Hoikkala A., Lakovaara S., and Romppainen E. Mating behavior and male courtship sounds in the Drosophila virilis group. In: Lakovaara S. (Ed). "Advances in Genetics, Development, and Evolution of Drosophila." (1982), Plenum Publ. Corp., New York 407-421
40. Hoikkala A., Aspi J., and Suvanto L. Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male genetic quality in an insect species, Drosophila montana. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 (1998) 503-508
41. Hoikkala A., Päällysaho S., Aspi J., and Lumme J. Localization of genes affecting species differences in male courtship song between Drosophila virilis and. D. littoralis. Genet. Res. 75 (2000) 37-45
42. Holland B., and Rice W.R. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 5083-5088
43. Huttunen S., and Schlötterer C. Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in Drosophila virilis and their cross species amplification in members of the D. virilis group. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2 (2002) 593-596
44. Huttunen S., Campesan S., and Hoikkala A. Nucleotide variation at the no-on-transient A gene in Drosophila littoralis. Heredity 88 (2002) 39-45
45. Huttunen S., Vieira J., and Hoikkala A. Nucleotide and repeat length variation at the nonA gene of the Drosophila virilis group species and its effects on male courtship song. Genetica 115 (2002) 159-167
46. Isoherranen E., Aspi J., and Hoikkala A. Inheritance of species differences in female receptivity and song requirement between Drosophila virilis and D. montana. Hereditas 131 (1999) 203-209
47. Jennions M.D., and Petrie M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72 (1997) 283-327
48. Kirkpatrick M., and Ryan M.J. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350 (1991) 33-38
49. Kokko H., Brooks R., Jennions M.D., and Morley J. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270 (2003) 653-664
50. Kotiaho J.S., Simmons L.W., and Tomkins J.L. Toward a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410 (2001) 684-686
51. Kyriacou C.P. Single gene mutations in Drosophila: What can they tell us about the evolution of sexual behavior?. Genetica 116 (2002) 197-203
52. Kyriacou C.P., and Hall J.C. Learning and memory mutations impair acoustic priming of mating behavior in Drosophila. Nature 308 (1984) 62-65
53. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981) 3721-3725
54. Lee R.C.P. The role of male song in sex recognition in Zaprionus tuberculatus (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Anim. Behav. 34 (1986) 641-648
55. Liimatainen J.O., and Hoikkala A. Interactions of the males and females of three sympatric Drosophila virilis group species, D. montana, D. littoralis, and D. lummei, (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in intra- and interspecific courtships in the wild and in the laboratory. J. Insect Behav. 11 (1998) 399-417
56. Liimatainen J.O., Hoikkala A., Aspi J., and Welbergen P. Courtship in Drosophila montana: The effects of male auditory signals on the behavior of the flies. Anim. Behav. 43 (1992) 35-48
57. Mayr E. "Animal Species and Evolution." (1963), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
58. Milinski M., and Bakker T.C.M. Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344 (1990) 330-333
59. Milinski M., and Bakker T.C.M. Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 250 (1992) 229-233
60. Møller A.P. Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow. Nature 339 (1989) 132-135
61. Møller A.P. Effects of a haematophagous mite on the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica): A test of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis. Evolution 44 (1990) 771-784
62. Møller A.P., and Alatalo R.V. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266 (1999) 85-91
63. Mühlhäuser C., and Blanckenhorn W.U. The costs of avoiding matings in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav. Ecol. 13 (2002) 359-365
64. Orsini L., and Schlötterer C. Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in Drosophila montana and their cross-species amplification in D. virilis. Molecular Ecology Notes (2004) In press.
65. Päällysaho S., Huttunen S., and Hoikkala A. Identification of X chromosomal restriction fragment length polymorphism markers and their use in a gene localization study in Drosophila virilis and D. littoralis. Genome 44 (2001) 242-248
66. Päällysaho S., Aspi J., Liimatainen J.O., and Hoikkala A. Role of X chromosomal song genes in the evolution of species-specific courtship songs in Drosophila virilis group species. Behav. Genet. 33 (2003) 25-32
67. Peixoto A.A., and Hall J.C. Analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants reveals new genes involved in the courtship song of Drosophila. Genetics 148 (1998) 827-838
68. Pires A., and Hoy R.R. Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication .1. Field and laboratory studies of temperature effects on calling song production and recognition in Gryllus firmus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 171 (1992) 69-78
69. Pizzari T., and Snook R. Perspective: Sexual conflict and sexual selection: Chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57 (2003) 1223-1236
70. Pomiankowski A., and Møller A.P. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260 (1995) 21-29
71. Pomiankowski A., and Sheridan L. Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9 (1994) 242-244
72. Qvarnström A., Griffith S.C., and Gustafsson L. Male-male competition and parental care in collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis): An experiment controlling for differences in territory quality. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 (2000) 2547-2552
73. Rice W.R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381 (1996) 232-234
74. Rice W.R. Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from gene pool: Implications for the Y chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) 6217-6221
75. Riska B., Prout T., and Turelli M. Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics 123 (1989) 865-871
76. Ritchie M.G. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 14628-14631
77. Ritchie M.G., Townhill R.M., and Hoikkala A. Female preference for fly song: Playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56 (1998) 713-717
78. Ritchie M.G., Halsey E.J., and Gleason J.M. Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioral importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Anim. Behav. 58 (1999) 649-657
79. Ritchie M.G., Saarikettu M., Livingstone S., and Hoikkala A. Characterization of female preference functions for Drosophila montana courtship song and a test of the temperature coupling hypothesis. Evolution 55 (2001) 721-727
80. Ritchie M.G., Saarikettu M., and Hoikkala A. Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana. Anim. Behav (2005) In press.
81. Rodd F.H., Hughes K.A., Grether G.F., and Baril C.T. A possible nonsexual origin of mate preference: Are male guppies mimicking fruit?. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 (2002) 475-481
82. Rose M.R., and Doolittle W.F. Molecular biological mechanisms of speciation. Science 220 (1983) 157-220
83. Rowe L., and Houle D. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263 (1996) 1415-1421
84. Ryan M.J., and Rand A.S. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution 44 (1990) 305-314
85. Ryan M.J., and Rand A.S. Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in the tungara frog. Science 269 (1995) 390-392
86. Satokangas P., Liimatainen J.O., and Hoikkala A. Songs produced by the females of the Drosophila virilis group of species. Behav. Genet. 24 (1994) 263-272
87. Schluter D. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42 (1988) 849-861
88. Smith C., Barber I., Wootton R.J., and Chittka L. A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 (2004) 949-955
89. Suvanto L., Hoikkala A., and Liimatainen J.O. Secondary courtship songs and inhibitory songs of Drosophila virilis group males. Behav. Genet. 24 (1994) 85-94
90. Suvanto L., Liimatainen J.O., and Hoikkala A. Variability and evolvability of male song characters in Drosophila montana populations. Hereditas 130 (1999) 13-18
91. Suvanto L., Liimatainen J.O., Tregenza T., and Hoikkala A. Courtship signals and mate choice of the flies of inbred Drosophila montana strains. J. Evol. Biol. 13 (2000) 583-592
92. Templeton A.R. Mechanisms of speciation - A population genetic approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12 (1981) 23-48
93. Throckmorton L.H. The virilis species group. In: Ashburner M., Carson H.L., and Thompson Jr. J.N. (Eds). "The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila" Vol. 3b (1982), Academic Press, London, UK 227-296
94. Ting C.T., Takahashi A., and Wu C.I. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: Concurrent evolution at multiple loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. USA 98 (2001) 6709-6713
95. Tomaru M., Hiroshi M., and Oguma Y. Heterospecific inter-pulse intervals of courtship song elicit female rejection in Drosophila biauraria. Anim. Behav. 50 (1995) 905-914
96. Tomkins J.L., Radwan J., Kotiaho J.S., and Tregenza T. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 (2004) 323-328
97. Vuoristo M., Isoherranen E., and Hoikkala A. Female wing spreading as acceptance signal in the Drosophila virilis group of species. J. Insect Behav. 9 (1996) 505-516
98. Wagner G.P., and Bürger R. On the evolution of dominance modifiers II: A nonequilibrium approach to the evolution of genetic systems. J. Theor. Biol. 113 (1985) 475-500
99. Wagner Jr. W.E., and Harper C.J. Female life span and fertility are increased by the ejaculates of preferred males. Evolution 57 (2003) 2054-2066
100. Wilczynski W., Rand A.S., and Ryan M.J. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Brain Behav. Evol. 58 (2001) 137-151
101. Wilkinson G.S., and Reillo P.R. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255 (1994) 1-6
102. Williams M.A., Blouin A.G., and Noor M.A.F. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences. Heredity 86 (2001) 68-77
103. Wymann M.N., and Whiting M.J. Male mate preference for large size overrides species recognition in allopatric flat lizards (Platysaurus broadleyi). Acta Ethol. 6 (2003) 19-22
104. Zahavi A. Mate selection-Selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53 (1975) 205-214
105. Zahavi A. Cost of honesty (Further remarks on handicap principle). J. Theor. Biol. 67 (1977) 603-605
106. Zahavi A., and Zahavi A. "The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle." (1997), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK